green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Boyer v. Trustees of Indiana University (In re Fort Wayne Telsat, Inc.)
See In re New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co., 632 F.2d 955 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1062 , 101 S.Ct. 786 , 66 L.Ed.2d 605 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Del Grosso
See In re New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co., 632 F.2d 955 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1062 , 101 S.Ct. 786 , 66 L.Ed.2d 605 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Texaco, Inc. (In Re Texaco, Inc.)
Accord Barry v. Smith (In re New York, New Haven and Hartford R.R.), 632 F.2d 955 , 959 n. 2 (2d Cir.) (dictum), cert. denied sub nom., Barry v. American Financial Enter., Inc. 449 U.S. 1062 , 101 S.Ct. 786 , 66 L.Ed.2d 605 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Quest Medical, Inc. v. Apprill
See also Barry v. Smith (In re New York, N.H. & H.R.R.), 632 F.2d 955, 962-63 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1062 , 101 S.Ct. 786 , 66 L.Ed.2d 605 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Globe Transport & Trading Ltd. v. Guthrie Latex, Inc.
Misco, 108 S.Ct. at 371 . “[A]s long as the arbitrator is even arguably construing or applying the contract and acting within the scope of his authority, that a court is convinced he committed serious error does not suffice to overturn his decision.” Id.; see also Brady v. Form-Eze Systems, Inc., 623 F.2d 261, 264 (2d *44 Cir.1980) (“it is well established that arbitrators are not required to disclose the basis upon which their awards are made ... we are bound by the interpretation of the instrument so long as it is barely color-able.”), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1062 , 101 S.Ct. 786 , 66…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mendell v. Greenberg
See, e.g., In re New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Co. v. Smith, 632 F.2d 955, 962-63 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1062 , 101 S.Ct. 786 , 66 L.Ed.2d 605 (1980); Seaboard World Airlines, Inc. v. Tiger International, Inc., 600 F.2d 355, 361-62 (2d Cir.1979); Pavlidis v. New England Patriots Football Club, Inc., 737 F.2d 1227, 1234 (1st Cir.1984); South Coast Services Corp. v. Santa Ana Valley Irrigation Co., 669 F.2d 1265, 1271 (9th Cir.1982); Gerrity v. Chapin, [1979-80 Transfer Binder] Fed.Sec.L.Rep.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Matter of Walsh Construction, Inc., Bankrupt. United States of America v. Alaska National Bank of the North and Paul Burlingame, Trustee, in the Matter of Cecilia Ruth Walsh, Gerald Patrick Walsh, D/B/A Beaver Builders, Bankrupts. United States of America v. Alaska National Bank of the North and Paul Burlingame, Trustee
Compare Barry v. Smith (In re New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad), 632 F.2d 955 , 960 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1062 , 101 S.Ct. 786 , 66 L.Ed.2d 605 (1980). 11 The bankruptcy court amply considered the various factors that determine the reasonableness of the compromise.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alaska National Bank
Compare Barry v. Smith (In re New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad), 632 F.2d 955, 960 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1062 , 101 S.Ct. 786 , 66 L.Ed.2d 605 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Winfield
v.
Walgreen Co.
v.
Walgreen Co.
No. 80-623.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 15, 1980.
Published
App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.