green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
9.0 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Cuthbertson /”
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 41 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Sanusi
jjournalists possess a qualified privilege not to divulge confidential sources and not 154 to disclose unpublished information in their possession in criminal cases.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
National Labor Relations Board v. Mortensen
of course, the lack of a confidential source may be an important element in balancing the defendant's need for the material sought against the interest of the journalist in preventing production in a particular case.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Reyes
See United States v. Cuthbertson, 630 F.2d 139, 144-45 (3d Cir.1980) (finding that the district court had acted within its discretion “in requiring pretrial production to the court to expedite its trial decisions”), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981); Fields, 663 F.2d at 881 (suggesting that a sufficient showing of relevancy and specificity would “warrant in camera production to the district court for possible release after the evidentiary requirement had been met,” but declining to decide whether the defendant had made such a showing); see also Reed, 7…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bryant
See United States v. Peister, 631 F.2d 658, 662-63 (10th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bryant
See United States v. Peister, 631 F.2d 658, 662-63 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Cartwright
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Cuthbertson, 630 F2d 139, 144 (3d Cir), cert den 449 US 1126 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Caruso
See United States v. Cuthbertson, 630 F.2d 139, 144 (3d Cir.1980) (“[R]ule 17(c) is designed as an aid for obtaining relevant evidentiary material that the moving party may use at trial.”) (citing United States v. Malizia, 154 F.Supp. 511, 513 (S.D.N.Y.1957)), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Food Lion, Inc. v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.
See, United States v. Cuthbertson, 630 F.2d 139 (3rd Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca10 1996
See Gravatt, 868 F.2d at 590 . 38 In United States v. Peister, 631 F.2d 658, 661-62 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981), this circuit rejected the pretrial protection approach without resolving whether use of a defendant's financial affidavit and other statements made to obtain appointed counsel violates the Fifth Amendment.
cited
Cited "see"
Cornell v. State
See Cornell v. State, 628 F.2d 1044 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 944 , 67 L.Ed.2d 112 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul Ryan Compton
See United States v. Cuthbertson, 630 F.2d 139, 144-45 (3d Cir.1980) ("materials that may be used for impeaching a witness called by the opposing party" may be obtained using a Rule 17(c) subpoena), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Diane Turner (90-1546), Edwin Leon Turner (90-1547)
See United States v. Peister, 631 F.2d 658, 662 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Allan Cornell v. Crispus Nix, Warden, Isp
See Cornell v. Iowa, 628 F.2d 1044 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 944 , 67 L.Ed.2d 112 (1981) 1 In the present case, Cornell contends that he was denied his constitutional right to due process because the state suppressed material exculpatory evidence and because newly discovered evidence shows that his conviction was based on false testimony.
discussed
Cited "see"
Don King Productions, Inc. v. Douglas
See United States v. Cuthbertson, 630 F.2d 139 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981) (verbatim statements of witnesses contained in videotape "[b]y their very nature ... are not obtainable from any other source.
discussed
Cited "see"
ca1 1989
See Mazus v. Dep't of Trans., 629 F.2d 870, 873 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981); Rosenthal v. Rizzo, 555 F.2d 390, 392 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 892 , 98 S.Ct. 268 , 54 L.Ed.2d 178 (1977); Indiana State Employees Ass'n v. Indiana Republican State Cent.
discussed
Cited "see"
Agosto-de-Feliciano v. Aponte-Roque
See Mazus v. Dep't of Trans., 629 F.2d 870, 873 (3d Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981); Rosenthal v. Rizzo, 555 F.2d 390, 392 (3d Cir.1977), ce rt. denied, 434 U.S. 892 , 98 S.Ct. 268 , 54 L.Ed.2d 178 (1977); Indiana State Employees Ass’n v. Indiana Republican State Cent.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Norton, United States of America v. Paul Fosco, James Pinckard, Paul A. Di Franco, James Norton, Defendants
See Cornell v. Iowa, 628 F.2d 1044 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 944 , 67 L.Ed.2d 112 (1981); see also Butler v. United States, 254 F.2d 875, 876 (5th Cir.1958) (trial judge’s inquiry as to numerical standing on conviction or acquittal held not reversible error where it had no coercive effect on jury and did not affect substantial rights of defendant); accord Beale v. United States, 263 F.2d 215, 217 (5th Cir.1959).
cited
Cited "see"
Cornell v. State
See Cornell v. Iowa, 628 F.2d 1044 (8th Cir. 1980) cert. denied 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 944 , 67 L.Ed.2d 112 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gary Stephen Domina
(2×)
See United States v. Cuthbertson, 630 F.2d 139, 148 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca3 1985
See Mazus v. Department of Transportation, 629 F.2d 870 , 875-76 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981); Alexander v. Gino's, Inc., 621 F.2d 71 , 73-74 (3d Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980). 80 Similarly, we can perceive no bar to the present appeal because the named plaintiffs have won relief on the merits.
discussed
Cited "see"
Eisenberg v. Gagnon
See Mazus v. Department of Transportation, 629 F.2d 870 , 875-76 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981); Alexander v. Gino’s, Inc., 621 F.2d 71 , 73-74 (3d Cir.) (per curiam), ce rt. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
People v. Johnson
See United States v. Peister, 631 F.2d 658 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harris v. Ballone
See Mazus v. Department of Transportation, 629 F.2d 870 (3 Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981); Alexander v. Gino's, Inc., 621 F.2d 71 (3 Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harris v. Ballone
See Mazus v. Department of Transportation, 629 F.2d 870 (3 Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981); Alexander v. Gino's, Inc., 621 F.2d 71 (3 Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tavoulareas v. Piro
See United States v. Cuthbertson, 630 F.2d 139, 148 (3d Cir. 1980) (adopting a balancing test that weighs the litigant’s need for information against the interests underlying a qualified, journalistic privilege), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fields
See United States v. Cuthbertson, 630 F.2d 139, 144-45 (3d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981). 4 In light of our conclusion that issuance of the subpoena was unjustified under Fed.R.Cr.P. 17(c), we similarly need not address at this time the district court's rejection of Wells Fargo's claim that the documents sought were protected by the attorney-client privilege.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Fields
See United States v. Cuthbertson, 630 F.2d 139, 144-45 (3d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
David M. Daughtrey v. United States
Even if we assume that the disclosure could incriminate him in some fashion, any violation of Daughtrey's rights is "speculative and prospective only." Seattle Times Co. v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, 845 F.2d 1513, 1519 (9th Cir.1988); see also United States v. Peister, 631 F.2d 658, 662 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gomes v. Avco Corp.
See, e.g., Mazus v. Department of Transp., 629 F.2d 870 , 875 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cinel v. Connick
See, e.g., United States v. Cuthbertson, 630 F.2d 139, 147 (3 Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981) (Cuthbertson I); Application of Behar, 779 F.Supp. 273, 275 (S.D.N.Y.1991); Loadholtz v. Fields, 389 F.Supp. 1299, 1303 (M.D.Fla.1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lipinski v. Skinner
United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 77 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983); see also United States v. Cuthbertson, 630 F.2d 139, 147 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981) (courts must balance defendant’s need for desired information against journalist’s interest in preventing production in a specific case); cf. United States v. Hubbard, 493 F.Supp. 202, 205 (D.D.C.1979) (deciding that an asserted claim to privilege should be judged by balancing freedom of the press against “the obligation of all citizen…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Campbell v. Klevenhagen
See, e.g., United States v. Cuthbertson, 630 F.2d 139, 147 (3rd Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981); United States v. Cuthbertson, 651 F.2d 189, 191, 195-196 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1056 , 102 S.Ct. 604 , 70 L.Ed.2d 594 (1981); see also United States v. Caporale, 806 F.2d 1487, 1504 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1021 , 107 S.Ct. 3265 , 97 L.Ed.2d 763 (1987) (applying the Fifth Circuit’s tripartite test for overcoming the assertion of the privilege); United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 77 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dillon v. City and County of San Francisco
See, e.g., United States v. Cuthbertson, 630 F.2d 139, 147 (3rd Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981); Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Comm’n, 89 F.R.D. 489 (D.C.Cal.1981); United States v. Markiewicz, 732 F.Supp. 316, 319 (N.D.N.Y.1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Letellier
See, e.g., United States v. Cuthbertson, 630 F.2d 139, 148 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981); Miller v. Transamerican Press, Inc., 621 F.2d 721, 726 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1041 , 101 S.Ct. 1759 , 68 L.Ed.2d 238 (1981). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca1 1985
The propriety of using informal immunity has been frequently upheld. 3 United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120, 1133 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1249 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983); United States v. Librach, 536 F.2d 1228, 1230 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 939 , 97 S.Ct. 354 , 50 L.Ed.2d 308 (1976); see also United States v. Peister, 631 F.2d 658, 662-63 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anderson
The propriety of using informal immunity has been frequently upheld. 3 United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120, 1133 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1249 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983); United States v. Librach, 536 F.2d 1228, 1230 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 939 , 97 S.Ct. 354 , 50 L.Ed.2d 308 (1976); see also United States v. Peister, 631 F.2d 658, 662-63 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John L. Harris
See, e.g., United States v. Peister, 631 F.2d 658, 662 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981); United States v. Anderson, 567 F.2d 839, 840 (8th Cir.1977); United States v. Ellsworth, 547 F.2d 1096, 1098 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 2636 , 53 L.Ed.2d 247 (1977); United States v. Kaufman, 452 F.2d 1202 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 989 , 92 S.Ct. 1252 , 31 L.Ed.2d 455 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilkins v. Kalla
(Mackay v Driscoll, 3 Media L Rptr 2582; see, also, United States v Cuthbertson, 630 F2d 139, cert den 449 US 1126 .) To determine whether a journalist may assert a privilege to avoid testifying in civil litigation, the courts have expressly employed a “balancing test” similar to that articulated by the Supreme Court in Branzburg v Hayes ( 408 US 665 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Burke, Anthony Perla, Rocco Perla, and Richard Kuhn
See, e.g., United States v. Guthbertson, 630 F.2d 139, 146-47 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981); United States v. Hubbard, 493 F.Supp. 202, 205 (D.D.C.1979); see also Baker v. F & F Investment, 470 F.2d at 784-85 (this Court observed that the Supreme Court’s decision in Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 , 92 S.Ct. 2646 , 33 L.Ed.2d 626 (1972), recognized the need to balance First Amendment values even where a reporter is asked to testify before a grand jury).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Siel
See, e.g., United States v. Cuthbertson, 630 F.2d 139, 146 (3d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 (1981); In re Pennington, 224 Kan. 573, 574 , 581 P.2d at 812, 814 (1978) (reported in P.2d sub. nom.
Avnet
v.
Avnet
v.
Avnet
No. 80-896.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 26, 1981.
Published
Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied.