green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Heard v. Johnson
See Nunn v. Black, 506 F.Supp. 444, 448 (W.D.Va.1981) (applying Serbian and declining to adjudicate internal church dispute despite the fact that church had "no structured decision-making process”), aff'd, 661 F.2d 925 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1146 , 102 S.Ct. 1008 , 71 L.Ed.2d 299 (1982); Burgess v. Rock Creek Baptist Church, 734 F.Supp. 30 (D.D.C.1990) (noting that there was no justification for refusing to apply the Serbian Court’s analysis to a congregational church); First Baptist Church v. Ohio, 591 F.Supp. 676, 682 (S.D.Ohio 1983) ("because the hands off’ policy espo…
cited
Cited "see"
Jennings v. Tinley Park Community Consolidated School District No. 146
See Boyd v. Madison County Mutual Insurance Co., 653 F.2d 1173, 1177 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1146 , 102 S.Ct. 1008 , 71 L.Ed.2d 299 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Jennings v. Tinley Park Community Consolidated School District No. 146
See Boyd v. Madison County Mutual Insurance Co., 653 F.2d 1173, 1177 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1146 , 102 S.Ct. 1008 , 71 L.Ed.2d 299 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. Mount Jezreel Baptist Church
Compare Nunn v. Black, 506 F.Supp. 444 (W.D.Va.), aff'd, 661 F.2d 925 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1146 , 102 S.Ct. 1008 , 71 L.Ed.2d 299 (1982) (First Amendment prohibits judicial resolution of whether church members’ expulsion was in accordance with church expulsion procedures) with First Baptist Church of Glen Este v. Ohio, 591 F.Supp. 676, 683 (S.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Susan Scherr v. Woodland School Community Consolidated District No. 50, Rebecca Maganuco, on Behalf of Herself and Numerous Others Who Are Similarly Situated v. Leyden Community High School District 212
Instead, in both cases we assumed, without so holding, "that to establish a prima facie case plaintiffs need only show a difference in treatment between two major groups of employees of different sex." Beard, 840 F.2d at 411 ; Jennings, 796 F.2d at 965 n. 2; see also Boyd v. Madison County Mutual Insurance Co., 653 F.2d 1173, 1178 (7th Cir.1981), certiorari denied, 454 U.S. 1146 , 102 S.Ct. 1008 , 71 L.Ed.2d 299 (1982) (affirming district court's determination that prima facie case existed without formulating a standard).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Scherr v. Woodland School Community Consolidated District No. 50
Instead, in both cases we assumed, without so holding, "that to establish a prima facie case plaintiffs need only show a difference in treatment between two major groups of employees of different sex.” Beard, 840 F.2d at 411 ; Jennings, 796 F.2d at 965 n. 2; see also Boyd v. Madison County Mutual Insurance Co., 653 F.2d 1173, 1178 (7th Cir.1981), certiorari denied, 454 U.S. 1146 , 102 S.Ct. 1008 , 71 L.Ed.2d 299 (1982) (affirming district court’s determination that prima facie case existed without formulating a standard).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PAVERITE, INC.
v.
ITT INDUSTRIAL CREDIT COMPANY
v.
ITT INDUSTRIAL CREDIT COMPANY
No. 81-803.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 11, 1982.
102 S. Ct. 1008
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Eastern Division.
Denied.