green
Positive treatment
8.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 40 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Harlow v. State
See Hopkinson v. State, Wyo., 632 P.2d 79 (1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982); Jones v. State, Wyo., 580 P.2d 1150 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Hodgins v. State
See Hopkinson v. State, 632 P.2d 79, 166 (Wyo.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Canady
See Hopkinson v. State, 632 P.2d 79, 130 (Wyo.1981) (“[a] party may not merely have hearsay admitted under [the state of mind exception] in order to circumvent the [hearsay] rule”), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Engberg v. Meyer
(2×)
See Hopkinson v. State, 632 P.2d 79 (Wyo. 1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mark A. Hopkinson v. Duane Shillinger, and the Attorney General of the State of Wyoming
(2×)
See Hopkinson v. State, 632 P.2d 79, 97 (Wyo.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982) (Hopkinson I).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mark A. Hopkinson v. Duane Shillinger, and the Attorney General of the State of Wyoming
(2×)
See Hopkinson v. State, 632 P.2d 79 (Wyo.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982) (Hopkinson I).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gabriel Alvarez, Gustavo Holguin, Leovigilda Rivera, Humberto Olivares Castrellon and Oneyda Zambrana
(2×)
Faurote, 749 F.2d at 43 ; see United States v. Hughes, 658 F.2d 317, 322 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982); United States v. Blakey, 607 F.2d 779, 787 (7th Cir.1979). a. true and accurate recordings The government presented clear and convincing evidence to show that the conversations were recorded truly and accurately.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Finley
See United States v. Hughes, 658 F.2d 317, 320 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cutbirth v. State
(2×)
See Hopkinson v. State, Wyo., 632 P.2d 79 (1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982); Jones v. State, Wyo., 580 P.2d 1150 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Haselhuhn v. State
(2×)
See Hopkinson v. State, Wyo., 632 P.2d 79 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Bounds
(2×)
Nothing less than a specific intent to kill must be found before a defendant can be convicted of attempt to commit murder, and the instructions in this respect should be lean and unequivocal in explaining to the jury that only a specific intent to kill will do.” (People v. Santascoy (1984) 153 Cal.App.3d 909, 918 [ 200 Cal.Rptr. 709 ]; accord People v. Murtishaw (1981) 29 Cal.3d 733, 762-764 [ 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 ], cert. den. (1982) 455 U.S. 922 [ 71 L.Ed.2d 464 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 ]; People v. Collie (1981) 30 Cal.3d 43, 61-62 [ 177 Cal.Rptr. 458 , 634 P.2d 534 , 23 A.L.R.4th 776…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cesar Tenorio-Angel
See United States v. Hughes, 658 F.2d 317, 321 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982); United States v. Bower, 575 F.2d 499, 503 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 983 , 99 S.Ct. 572 , 58 L.Ed.2d 654 (1978). 10 As recently stated by the Fifth Circuit in United States v. Aguirre Aguirre, 716 F.2d 293 (5th Cir.1983): Although the confidential informant's privilege no longer exists when the informant is known to the defendant “[t]he need for the informant’s safety, the avoidance of jeopardizing other opera *1511 tions, or the defendant’s …
discussed
Cited "see"
State Ex Rel. Hopkinson v. District Court, Teton County
See Hopkinson v. State, Wyo., 632 P.2d 79 (1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982) [Hopkinson I]; Hopkinson v. State, Wyo., 664 P.2d 43 , cert. denied — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 262 , 78 L.Ed.2d 246 (1983) [Hopkinson II]; Hopkinson v. State, Wyo., 679 P.2d 1008 , cert. denied — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 228 , 83 L.Ed.2d 157 (1984) [Hopkinson III], Briefly, the facts are that appellant was found guilty of four murders and, as a result of the presence of statutory aggravating circumstances and upon recommendation of a jury, sentenced to death for the murder of Jeff Green.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Walter Lewis Clark, Iii, and George R. Newton, Moody Nichols, Defendants
United States v. Williams, 503 F.2d 50, 53 (6th Cir.1974); see United States v. Hughes, 658 F.2d 317, 320 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982); United States v. Mullins, 638 F.2d 1151, 1152 (8th Cir.1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jimmy Dale Wood
See, United States v. Hughes, 658 F.2d 317, 322 (5th Cir.1981), cert. den., 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Clark N. Fischel
See United States v. Hughes, 658 F.2d 317, 321 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Kingkamau Nantambu
The panel cited the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, stating that “ ‘[t]he fact that [the operator] successfully made the tape recordings [ ] satisfies the competency requirement.’ ” Id. at 511 , 644 A.2d 672 (second alteration in original) (quoting United States v. Franklin, 747 F.2d 497, 498 (8th Cir.1984)); see also United States v. Hughes, 658 F.2d 317 (5th Cir.1981) (holding because “the paramount purpose of the inquiry is to insure the accuracy of the recording^] ... the government’s failure to show the competency of either the operator or the machine was overshadowed…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Albarran v. State
See e.g., People v. Murtishaw, 29 Cal.3d 733 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982) (trial judge has discretionary authority to permit defense access to jury records); Moon v. State, 258 Ga. 748 , 375 S.E.2d 442 (1988), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1638 , 113 L.Ed.2d 733 (1991) (trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for pretrial discovery of state’s juror information records); State v. Wiggins, 556 So.2d 622 (La.App.1990) (defendant is not necessarily entitled to ‘rap sheets’ of prospectiv…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Doster v. State
See e.g., People v. Murtishaw, 29 Cal.3d 733 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982)(trial judge has discretionary authority to permit defense access to jury records); Moon v. State, 258 Ga. 748 , 375 S.E.2d 442 (1988), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1638 , 113 L.Ed.2d 733 (1991) (trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for pretrial discovery of state’s juror information records); State v. Wiggins, 556 So.2d 622 (La.App.1990) (defendant is not necessarily entitled to ‘rap sheets’ of prospective…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Phillips v. State
See, e.g., People v. Murtishaw, 29 Cal.3d 733 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982) (trial judge has discretionary authority to permit defense access to jury records); Moon v. State, 258 Ga. 748 , 375 S.E.2d 442 (1988), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1638 , 113 L.Ed.2d 733 (1991) (trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for pretrial discovery of state’s juror information records); State v. Wiggins, 556 So.2d 622 (La.App.1990) (defendant is not necessarily entitled to “rap sheets” of prospecti…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Billups v. State
See, e.g., People v. Murtishaw, 29 Cal.3d 733 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982) (trial judge has discretionary authority to permit defense access to jury records); Moon v. State, 258 Ga. 748 , 375 S.E.2d 442 (1988), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1638 , 113 L.Ed.2d 733 (1991) (trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for pretrial discovery of state’s juror information records); State v. Wiggins, 556 So.2d 622 (La.App.1990) (defendant is not necessarily entitled to ‘rap sheets’ of prospecti…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Saunders v. State
See also Palmer v. State, *80 401 So.2d 266, 268 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 401 So.2d 270 (Ala.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).” Jones v. State, [Ms. CR-05-0527, Aug. 31, 2007] — So.3d -, - (Ala.Crim.App.2007), quoting Hubbard v. State, 500 So.2d 1204, 1218 (Ala.Crim.App.), aff'd, 500 So.2d 1231 (Ala.1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. State
See also Palmer v. State, 401 So.2d 266, 268 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 401 So.2d 270 (Ala.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Brownfield v. State
See also Palmer v. State, 401 So.2d 266, 268 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 401 So.2d 270 (Ala.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. State
See e.g., People v. Murtishaw, 29 Cal.3d 733 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982)(trial judge has discretionary authority to permit defense access to jury records); Moon v. State, 258 Ga. 748 , 375 S.E.2d 442 (1988), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1638 , 113 L.Ed.2d 733 (1991) (trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion for pretrial discovery of state's juror information records); State v. Wiggins, 556 So.2d 622 (La.App.1990) (defendant is not necessarily entitled to `rap sheets' of prospective jurors)…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Barber v. State
See also Palmer v. State, 401 So.2d 266, 268 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 401 So.2d 270 (Ala.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hocker v. State
See also Palmer v. State , 401 So.2d 266 , 268 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 401 So.2d 270 (Ala. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dorsey v. State
See, e.g., People v. Murtishaw, 29 Cal.3d 733 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982) (trial judge has discretionary authority to permit defense access to jury records); Moon v. State, 258 Ga. 748 , 375 S.E.2d 442 (1988), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1638 , 113 L.Ed.2d 733 (1991) (trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion for pretrial discovery of state's juror information records); State v. Wiggins, 556 So.2d 622 (La.App.1990)(defendant is not necessarily entitled to `rap sheets' of prospective jurors…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McGriff v. State
See, e.g., People v. Murtishaw, *982 29 Cal.3d 733 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982) (trial judge has discretionary authority to permit defense access to jury records); Moon v. State, 258 Ga. 748 , 375 S.E.2d 442 (1988), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1638 , 113 L.Ed.2d 733 (1991) (trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion for pretrial discovery of state's juror information records); State v. Wiggins, 556 So.2d 622 (La.App.1990) (defendant is not necessarily entitled to "rap sheets" of prospective …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McGriff v. State
See, e.g., People v. Murtishaw, 29 Cal.3d 733 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982) (trial judge has discretionary authority to permit defense access to jury records); Moon v. State, 258 Ga. 748 , 375 S.E.2d 442 (1988), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1638 , 113 L.Ed.2d 733 (1991) (trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for pretrial discovery of state’s juror information records); State v. Wiggins, 556 So.2d 622 (La.App.1990) (defendant is not necessarily entitled to “rap sheets” of prospecti…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arthur v. State
See, e.g., People v. Murtishaw, 29 Cal.3d 733 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982) (trial judge has discretionary authority to permit defense access to jury records); Moon v. State, 258 Ga. 748 , 375 S.E.2d 442 (1988), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1638 , 113 L.Ed.2d 733 (1991) (trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion for pretrial discovery of state's juror information records); State v. Wiggins, 556 So.2d 622 (La.App.1990) (defendant is not necessarily entitled to `rap sheets' of prospective juror…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Keith Daniel Williams v. Arthur Calderon, Warden, San Quentin State Prison
Compare People v. Murtishaw, 29 Cal.3d 733, 773 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981) (allowing jury under 1977 law to consider evidence not tied to any statutory factor), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982), with Boyd, 38 Cal.3d at 773-74 , 215 Cal.Rptr. 1 , 700 P.2d 782 (reaching opposite conclusion under 1978 law).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kelley v. State
See, e.g., People v. Murtishaw , 29 Cal.3d 733 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982) (trial judge has discretionary authority to permit defense access to jury records); Moon v. State , 258 Ga. 748 , 375 S.E.2d 442 (1988), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 1638 , 113 L.Ed.2d 733 (1991) (trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion for pretrial discovery of state's juror information records); State v. Wiggins , 556 So.2d 622 (La.App. 1990) (defendant is not necessarily entitled to "rap sheets" of prospective ju…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Clark
(2×)
See, e.g., People v. Murtishaw, 29 Cal.3d 733, 756 , 631 P.2d 446, 459 , 175 Cal. Rptr. 738, 751 , cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1981); Clark v. State, 363 So.2d 331, 333 (Fla. 1978); People v. Davis, 125 Ill.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bridges v. State
See also Palmer v. State , 401 So.2d 266 , 268 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied , 401 So.2d 270 (Ala. 1981), cert. denied , 455 U.S. 922 [ 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 ] (1982).' " Free v. State , 495 So.2d 1147 , 1156 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986), quoting Moore v. State , 488 So.2d 27 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Houston
(2×)
(People v. Jimenez (1978) 21 Cal.3d 595, 602-608 [ 147 Cal.Rptr. 172 , 580 P.2d 672 ]; see also People v. Murtishaw (1981) 29 Cal.3d 733, 753 [ 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 ], cert. den. (1982) 455 U.S. 922 [ 71 L.Ed.2d 464 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 ].) We think similar principles bear on a finding whether a confession was obtained in violation of the right to counsel. 20 The court below found it could not say beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant’s interrogation had ceased before Attorney Gowdy arrived at the Walnut Creek station.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Free v. State
See also Palmer v. State , 401 So.2d 266 , 268 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 401 So.2d 270 (Ala. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 [ 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 ] (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hubbard v. State
See also Palmer v. State , 401 So.2d 266 , 268 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 401 So.2d 270 (Ala. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Moore v. State
See also Palmer v. State , 401 So.2d 266 , 268 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 401 So.2d 270 (Ala. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Patterson v. State
(2×)
See also Hopkinson v. State, Wyo., 632 P.2d 79, 111 (1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982), where we said: "* * * The purpose of voir dire is to inquire of the jurors as to their prejudices and biases which would interfere with their ability to decide the case fairly." In order to attain the purpose which we identified in Lopez v. State, supra, Hopkinson v. State, supra, and the other opinions cited above, it is necessary that a litigant, his attorney and the court be allowed to develop such facts and disclose such legal principles as are necessary to permit…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hopkinson
v.
Wyoming
v.
Wyoming
No. 81-5604.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 25, 1982.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. Wyo. Certiorari denied.