Am. Med. Assn. v. FTC, 455 U.S. 676 (1982). · Go Syfert
Am. Med. Assn. v. FTC, 455 U.S. 676 (1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
88 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 24 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: CALIFORNIA DENTAL ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent (ca9, 1997-10-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited "see" CALIFORNIA DENTAL ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent (10×)
9th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re American Medical Assoc., 94 F.T.C. 701 , 983-84 (1980), aff'd, 638 F.2d 443 (2d Cir.1980), aff'd by an equally divided court, 455 U.S. 676 , 102 S.Ct. 1744 , 71 L.Ed.2d 546 (1982) (“AMA”).
cited Cited "see" Sherwood T. Rodrigues v. United States Secretary of Labor, Raymond J. Donovan, Defendants
9th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Stratman v. Watt, 656 F.2d 1321, 1326 (9th Cir.1981), cert. dismissed, 456 U.S. 901 , 102 S.Ct. 1744 , 72 L.Ed.2d 170 (1982); SEC v. G.C.
discussed Cited "see" Dan Caputo Co. v. Russian River County Sanitation District
9th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
Although courts have expanded the zone-of-interest test by applying it to regulations as well as to statutes and constitutional provisions, e.g., Gull Airborne Instruments, Inc. v. Weinberger, 694 F.2d 838, 842 (D.C.Cir.1982); see Stratman v. Watt, 656 F.2d 1321, 1324 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 901 , 102 S.Ct. 1744 , 72 L.Ed.2d 170 (1982), the EPA regulation here does not assist Caputo/Wagner.
discussed Cited "see" Dan Caputo Co. v. Russian River County Sanitation District
9th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
Although courts have expanded the zone-of-interest test by applying it to regulations as well as to statutes and constitutional provisions, e.g., Gull Airborne Instruments, Inc. v. Weinberger, 694 F.2d 838, 842 (D.C.Cir.1982); see Stratman v. Watt, 656 F.2d 1321, 1324 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 901 , 102 S.Ct. 1744 , 72 L.Ed.2d 170 (1982), the EPA regulation here does not assist Caputo/Wagner.
discussed Cited "see" V. O. Motors, Inc., a Corporation v. California State Board of Equalization, Etc.
9th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States of America v. California State Board of Equalization, 650 F.2d 1127 (9th Cir.), aff’d, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1744 , 72 L.Ed.2d 157 (1972); United States of America v. State Board of Equalization, No. 72-2568-R (Oct. 21, 1975), aff’d, 536 F.2d 294 (9th Cir. 1976).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Chestnut Fleet Rentals, Inc. v. State, Department of Revenue
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. California State Bd. of Equalization, 650 F.2d 1127 (9th Cir.1981) affirmed 456 U.S. 901 , 102 S.Ct. 1744 , 72 L.Ed.2d 157 (1982).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sierra Club v. Watt (2×)
E.D. Cal. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Stratman v. Watt, 656 F.2d 1321, 1324 (9th Cir.1981), cert. dism., 456 U.S. 901 , 102 S.Ct. 1744 , 72 L.Ed.2d 170 (1982); California v. Watt, 683 F.2d 1253, 1270-71 (9th Cir.1982), rev’d on other grounds, 464 U.S. 312 , 104 S.Ct. 656 , 78 L.Ed.2d 496 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION ET AL.
v.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION.
80-1690.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 24, 1982.
455 U.S. 676
Per Curiam.
Cited by 12 opinions  |  Published
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.

Newton N. Minow argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Jack R. Bierig, David W. Carpenter, William J. Doyle, and Linda L. Randell.

Howard E. Shapiro argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Lee, Assistant Attorney General Baxter, Deputy Solicitor General Shapiro, Elliott Schulder, March Coleman, and L. Barry Costilo.[*]

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

[*677] JUSTICE BLACKMUN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

[*] Peter M. Sfikas filed a brief for the American Dental Association as amicus curiae urging reversal.

A brief for the State of Ohio et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance was filed by William J. Brown, Attorney General of Ohio, and Eugene F. McShane, Charles D. Weller, and Clifton E. Johnson, Assistant Attorneys General; Robert K. Corbin, Attorney General of Arizona; J. D. MacFarlane, Attorney General of Colorado, and Thomas P. McMahon, Assistant Attorney General; Carl R. Ajello, Attorney General of Connecticut, and Robert M. Langer and John R. Lacey, Assistant Attorneys General; Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General of Iowa, and John R. Perkins, Assistant Attorney General; Stephen H. Sachs, Attorney General of Maryland, and Charles O. Monk II and Naomi F. Samet, Assistant Attorneys General; Warren Spannaus, Attorney General of Minnesota, and Stephen P. Kilgriff, Special Assistant Attorney General; Paul L. Douglas, Attorney General of Nebraska, and Dale A. Comer, Assistant Attorney General; Jeff Bingaman, Attorney General of New Mexico, and James J. Wechsler and Richard H. Levin, Assistant Attorneys General; Robert Abrams, Attorney General of New York, and Lloyd Constantine, Assistant Attorney General; Rufus L. Edmisten, Attorney General of North Carolina, H. A. Cole, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, and Fred R. Gamin, Assistant Attorney General; Leroy S. Zimmerman, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Carl S. Hisiro, Deputy Attorney General; Dennis J. Roberts II, Attorney General of Rhode Island, and Patrick J. Quinlan, Special Assistant Attorney General; and Chauncey H. Browning, Attorney General of West Virginia, and Charles G. Brown, Deputy Attorney General.