green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.5 score
“when alleged brady material is contained in jencks act material, disclosure is generally timely if the government complies with the jencks act”
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Causey
when alleged brady material is contained in jencks act material, disclosure is generally timely if the government complies with the jencks act
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
St. Luke's Medical Center v. United States
here congress has provided a method for review, whitecliff and its progeny require that we respect that choice.
discussed
Cited "see"
Burns v. United States
“This court has no jurisdiction over claims based upon the Due Process and Equal Protection guarantees of the Fifth Amendment, because these constitutional provisions do not obligate the Federal Government to pay money damages.” Carruth v. United States, 224 Ct.Cl. 422, 445 , 627 F.2d 1068 (1980); Bellamy v. United States, 7 Cl.Ct. 720, 723 (1985); see Alabama Hospital Ass’n. v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 176, 180 , 656 F.2d 606 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lynne Simon, Jean Martinez, Marilyn Jacobs, and Carol Lindenberg
See United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 401 (5th Cir.1981) (defendant causes use of *1466 mails when he acts with knowledge that mails will be used in ordinary course of business), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982); Banco de Desarrollo Agropecuario, 640 F.Supp. at 1175 (one telephone call within jurisdiction in furtherance of fraud brings activity within statute).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Caporale
See United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 382-83 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Caporale, Alfred Pilotto, Seymour A. Gopman, Bernard Rubin, George Wuagneux, Salvatore Tricario, Louis C. Ostrer, and John Giardiello, Defendants- United States of America v. Seymour Gopman, Salvatore Tricario, George Wuagneux, Louis C. Ostrer, John Giardiello, James Caporale, Alfred Pilotto and Bernard Rubin, Defendants
See United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 382-83 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael G. Michaels
See United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 381 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dempsey Buford Merida, David Lee Merida, William Benjamin King, Tim Walker and Billy Ray Lilley
See United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982); Calley v. Callaway, 519 F.2d 184 (5th Cir.1975) (en banc), cert. denied sub nom, Calley v. Hoffman, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1505 , 47 L.Ed.2d 760 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Hargrett v. United States
See Alabama Hospital Association v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 176, 181 , 656 F.2d 606, 610 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bache Halsey Stuart Shields Inc. v. Tracy Collins Bank & Trust Co.
Accord, e.g., United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 383 (5th Cir.1981) cert. denied, Russello v. United States, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982); United States v. Barrentine, 591 F.2d 1069, 1077 (5th Cir.1979), rehearing denied, 599 F.2d 1054 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Beckman
See United States v. Rylander, 656 F.2d 1313, 1319 (9th Cir. 1981), cert, granted, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Abbell
While the number of defendants should not be the determinative factor in whether a court grants or denies a motion to sever, severance becomes necessary if the jury will not be able to "individualize each defendant in his relation to the mass." United States v. Watchmaker, 761 F.2d 1459, 1476 (11th Cir.1985) (quoting Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750 , 66 S.Ct. 1239 , 90 L.Ed. 1557 (1946)), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1101 , 106 S.Ct. 880 , 88 L.Ed.2d 917 (1986); see also, United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 385 (5th Cir.1981) (assessing "`whether ... it is within the capacity of the jur…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Starrett
In order for the jury to find that Nolan associated with the enterprise, the jury need merely find that he was “aware of at least the general existence of the enterprise named in the indictment.” United States v. Console, 13 F.3d 641, 653 (3d Cir.1993) (citations and quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1660 , 128 L.Ed.2d 377 (1994); see also United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 394 (5th Cir. June 1981) (“A defendant must know something about his co-defendants’ related activities which make up the enterprise, but it is not necessary that he be aware of all r…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Walter Starrett, Timothy Kevin Duke, Michael Lee Cave, Donald Joe Sears, James Thomas Nolan, Frederick Joseph Hegney, United States of America v. Donald Joe Sears, James Thomas Nolan
In order for the jury to find that Nolan associated with the enterprise, the jury need merely find that he was "aware of at least the general existence of the enterprise named in the indictment." United States v. Console, 13 F.3d 641, 653 (3d Cir.1993) (citations and quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1660 , 128 L.Ed.2d 377 (1994); see also United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 394 (5th Cir. June 1981) ("A defendant must know something about his co-defendants' related activities which make up the enterprise, but it is not necessary that he be aware of all racket…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Harris
See also United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 388 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 2007, 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cupey Bajo Nursing Home, Inc. v. United States
See, e.g., Alabama Hospital Association v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 176, 181-182 , 656 F.2d 606, 610 , cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Patrick C. Richerson
In United States v. L’Hoste, 609 F.2d 796 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 833 , 101 S.Ct. 104 , 66 L.Ed.2d 39 (1980) the court stated that “If the Government proves multiple conspiracies and a defendant’s involvement in at least one of them, then clearly there is no variance affecting that defendant’s substantial rights.” Id. at 801; see also United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 382 (5th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Angelo Pepe and Thomas Miglionico, United States of America v. Albert Joseph Facchiano, Francis Santo, Paul Santo
See also United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 402-03 (5th Cir.1981) (arson and mail fraud arising from same burning), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 2020 , 72 L.Ed.2d 474 , 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2007 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 , 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982); United States v. Colacurio, 659 F.2d 684 , 688 n. 4 (5th Cir.1981) (multiple briberies), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1002 , 102 S.Ct. 1635 , 71 L.Ed.2d 869 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Benny
See also United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 403 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982); United States v. Bright, 630 F.2d 804 , 830 n. 47 (5th Cir.1980); United States v. Weisman, 624 F.2d 1118 , 1122 n. 3 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct. 209 , 66 L.Ed.2d 91 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Matter of Grand Jury Empanelled March 19, 1980 United States of America
See, e.g., United States v. Rylander, 656 F.2d 1313, 1318-20 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. granted, -U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982). 19 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Rylander
v.
Rylander
No. 81-1120.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 26, 1982.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Claims (1) · S.D. Texas (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of respondent Richard W. Rylander, Sr., for leave to proceed informa pauperis and certiorari granted.