green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Miller v. Auto Craft Shop
See Labash v. United States Dep’t of Army, 668 F.2d 1153, 1155 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2299 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1982); Towry v. United States, 459 F.Supp. 101, 108 (E.D.La.1978) (holding that judicial review is precluded even where the outcome “is alleged to be arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, and not based on substantial evidence”), aff 'd, 620 F.2d 568 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1078 , 101 S.Ct. 858 , 66 L.Ed.2d 801 (1981); but see, Welch v. United States, 446 F.Supp. 75, 78 (D.Conn.1978) (based upon its examination of the legislative h…
discussed
Cited "see"
Novello v. Randall
See Hospah Coal Co. v. Chaco Energy Co., 673 F.2d 1161 , 1163 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 2299 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1302 (1982); Barber-Greene Co. v. Blaw-Knox Co., 239 F.2d 774, 778 (6th Cir.1957); American Modern Home Ins. v. Insured Accounts Co., 704 F.Supp. 128, 129 (S.D.Ohio 1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
MacCaskill v. United States
The MCA expressly excludes judicial review of claims adjudicated under its provisions. 10 U.S.C. § 2735 ; see Labash v. United States, 668 F.2d 1153 (10th Cir.1982) cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2299 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1982) (§ 2735 contains “clear and convincing evidence” that Congress intended to preclude judicial review of administrative decisions under the MCA).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hill's Pet Products v. A.S.U., Inc.
See, e.g., Cessna Aircraft Co. v. Brown, 348 F.2d 689, 692 (10th Cir.1965); see abo Hospah Coal Co. v. Chaco Energy Co., 673 F.2d 1161, 1164 (10th Cir.) (court that first obtains jurisdiction should be allowed to first decide issues of venue), ce rt. denied, 456 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 2299 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1302 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rodrigue v. United States
See Labash v. United States Dept. of Army, 668 F.2d 1153 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2299 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1982); Poindexter v. United States, 777 F.2d 231 (5th Cir.1985); Broadnax v. United States Army, 710 F.2d 865 (D.C.Cir.1983); Bryson v. United States, 463 F.Supp. 908 (E.D.Pa.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
J. Gary Madsen v. The United States of America, Ex Rel. The United States Army, Corps of Engineers
See LaBash v. United States Dept. of Army, 668 F.2d 1153 , 1156 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2299 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re \Agent Orange\" Product Liability Litigation. The Dow Chemical Company"
Thus, notwithstanding any circumstances in which state law would hold a private person liable for his acts, if those circumstances are in any material respect not "like" those in which the government's act occurred, there has been no FTCA waiver of sovereign immunity. 14 Caban v. United States, 728 F.2d 68, 73-74 (2d Cir.1984); see Arvanis v. Noslo Engineering Consultants, Inc., 739 F.2d 1287, 1292 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S.Ct. 964 , 83 L.Ed.2d 969 (1985). 15 Feres created a bar against recovery that was substantive, not procedural, Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. United S…
discussed
Cited "see"
Heller v. United States
Towry v. United States, 459 F.Supp. 101, 108 (E.D.La.1978), aff'd, 620 F.2d 568 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1078 , 101 S.Ct. 858 , 66 L.Ed.2d 801 (1981); see Labash v. United States, 668 F.2d 1153 , 1156 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2299 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1982).III. 15 The district court observed that Heller possesses two distinct remedies to seek relief for the alleged wrongful death of his wife: Heller can sue the individual defendants under Philippine tort law in the Republic of the Philippines or proceed with his claim under the Military Claims Act.
discussed
Cited "see"
Heller v. United States
Towry v. United States, 459 F.Supp. 101, 108 (E.D.La.1978), aff 'd, 620 F.2d 568 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1078 , 101 S.Ct. 858 , 66 L.Ed.2d 801 (1981); see Labash v. United States, 668 F.2d 1153 , 1156 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2299 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gathercole v. Global Associates
See Smallwood v. United Air Lines, 661 F.2d 303 , 307 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 2299 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1302 (1982); Harriss v. Pan American World Airways, 649 F.2d 670 , 676-77 (9th Cir.1980); Criswell v. Western Air Lines, 514 F.Supp. 384 , 389 & n. 7 (C.D.Cal.1981). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stranger Creek v. Dakotah, Inc.
See, e.g., Orthmann v. Apple River Campground, Inc., 765 F.2d 119, 121 (8th Cir.1985); West Gulf Maritime Ass’n v. ILA Deep Sea Local 21, 751 F.2d 721, 729 (5th Cir.1985); Heatron, Inc. v. Shackelford, 898 F.Supp. 1491, 1494 (D.Kan.1995); see also Hospah Coal Co. v. Chaco Energy Co., 673 F.2d 1161, 1163 (10th Cir.), cert, denied, 456 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 2299 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1302 (1982) (recognizing general rule that “when two courts have concurrent jurisdiction, the first court in which jurisdiction attaches has priority to consider the case”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Victor Co., L.L.C. v. Ortho Organizers, Inc.
“A Federal District Court which first obtains jurisdiction of parties and issues may preserve its jurisdiction by enjoining proceedings involving the same issues and parties, begun thereafter in another Federal District Court.” Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co., 180 F.2d 97, 101 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 816 , 71 S.Ct. 46 , 95 L.Ed. 600 (1950); see also Hospah Coal Co. v. Chaco Energy Co., 673 F.2d 1161, 1164 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 2299 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1302 (1982) (court which first obtains jurisdiction should be allowed to first decide issu…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gathercole v. Global Associates
See, e.g., Smallwood v. United Air Lines, 661 F.2d 303 , 307 (4th Cir. 1981), cert, denied,-U.S.-, 102 S.Ct. 2299 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1302 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stafos
v.
Bell
v.
Bell
No. 81-1884.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 1, 1982.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.