Norris v. Estelle, 458 U.S. 1109 (1982). · Go Syfert
Search
Norris v. Estelle, 458 U.S. 1109 (1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
31 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. GLEN SLAUGHTER & ASSOCIATES (nmctapp, 1994-12-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. GLEN SLAUGHTER & ASSOCIATES
N.M. Ct. App. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Thevis, 665 F.2d 616, 645 (5th Cir.), certs. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2300 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1982), 458 U.S. 1109 , 102 S.Ct 3489 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1370 (1982), and 459 U.S. 825 , 103 S.Ct. 57 , 74 L.Ed.2d 61 (1982). 2 .
discussed Cited "see" State v. Lucero
N.M. Ct. App. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Stevens, 96 N.M. 627, 630 , 633 P.2d 1225, 1228 (1981) (no presumption of vindictiveness when a prosecutor seeks to bring additional charges before the defendant has successfully asserted his legally protected rights at trial or on appeal), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1109 , 102 S.Ct. 3489 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1371 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Mageean
D. Nev. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Thevis, 474 F.Supp. 134, 144-145 (N.D.Ga.1979) af f'd, 665 F.2d 616 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1109 , 102 S.Ct. 3489 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1370 (1981) (if the government shows that each of a corporation’s assets contributed to or were utilized in forwarding racketeering activities, then forfeiture of all of its assets would be proper).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mcmahon v. Mcdowell
3rd Cir. · 1986 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Thevis, 665 F.2d 616, 626 (5th Cir.), cert. denied in 456 U.S. 1108 , 102 S.Ct. 2300 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1982), and in 458 U.S. 1109 , 102 S.Ct. 3489 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1370 (1982), and in 459 U.S. 825 , 103 S.Ct. 57 , 74 L.Ed.2d 61 (1982) ("although ordinarily a panel must adhere to prior decisions of this court, our first duty is to follow the dictates of the United States Supreme Court."); Ralpho v. Bell, 569 F.2d 607, 629 (D.C.Cir.1977). 30 The district court's holding that plaintiffs' state law claims for fringe benefits and pension contributions are preempted by ERISA …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." McMahon v. McDowell
3rd Cir. · 1986 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Thevis, 665 F.2d 616, 626 (5th Cir.), cert. denied in 456 U.S. 1108 , 102 S.Ct. 2300 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1982), and in 458 U.S. 1109 , 102 S.Ct. 3489 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1370 (1982), and in 459 U.S. 825 , 103 S.Ct. 57 , 74 L.Ed.2d 61 (1982) (“although ordinarily a panel must adhere to prior decisions of this court, our first duty is to follow the dictates of the United States Supreme Court.”); Ralpho v. Bell, 569 F.2d 607, 629 (D.C.Cir.1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Norris
v.
Estelle, Director, Texas Department of Corrections
No. 81-5509.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 28, 1982.
458 U.S. 1109
Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.