green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.1 score
“martinez”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Crosby
See United States v. Contreras, 667 F.2d 976, 979 (11th Cir.) (warnings adequate where they advised of “right to consult with an attorney prior to questioning, to have an attorney present during questioning, and to have counsel appointed”), ce rt. den., 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982); Caparrosa v. Gov’t of Canal Zone, 411 F.2d 956 (5th Cir.1969) (warnings inadequate where they failed to inform of right to counsel present during his interrogation); Atwell v. United States, 398 F.2d 507 (5th Cir.1968) (warning inadequate where it “does not comply with Miranda’s dir…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mathis
See United States v. Crosby, 739 F.2d 1542, 1548 (11th Cir.) (citing United States v. Marx, 635 F.2d 436, 440-441 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981) and United States v. Contreras, 667 F.2d 976 , 978 n. 2 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982)), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1076 , 105 S.Ct. 576 , 83 L.Ed.2d 515 (1984); see also United States v. Vasquez, 858 F.2d 1387, 1389 (9th Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 1034 , 109 S.Ct. 847 , 102 L.Ed.2d 978 and 489 U.S. 1029 , 109 S.Ct. 1161 , 103 L.Ed.2d 220 (1989); 3 Charles Alan Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure: Crimina…
discussed
Cited "see"
Norris D. Sanders v. Barry Delevan, Police Officer James M. Beene, and Blanch Cane
See Boag v. Chief of Police, City of Portland, 669 F.2d 587, 589 (9th Cir.) (construing a similar Oregon statute, this court held that statute of limitations started running upon the prisoner's release on parole), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 (1982); Deutch v. Hoffman, 165 Cal.App.3d 152, 166 (1984) (statute of limitations not tolled during period when prisoner was on parole).
discussed
Cited "see"
William Stewart Smith v. Alameda County Sheriff Dept. Hayward Police Chief Hayward Police Dept. Hoover Charles B. Plummer Glenn Dyer
See Boag v. Chief of Police, City of Portland, 669 F.2d 587, 589 (9th Cir.) (per curiam) (construing a similar Oregon statute, this court held that statute of limitations started running upon the prisoner's release on parole), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 (1982); Deutch v. Hoffman, 165 Cal.App.3d 152, 166 , 211 Cal.Rptr. 319, 321 (1984) (statute of limitations not tolled during period when prisoner was on parole). 5 Here, Smith's claim regarding medical treatment arose during the period February 1, 1986, the date he was arrested, to March 7, 1986, the date he was released on bail.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cannon v. District of Columbia
See Boag v. Chief of Police, City of Portland, 669 F.2d 587, 589 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982); Jordan v. State, 290 N.Y.S.2d 621, 625 , 56 Misc.2d 1032 (N.Y.Ct.Cl.1968); Jepson v. Stubbs, 555 S.W.2d 307, 311 (Mo.1977) ( en banc); Jimenez v. Maloney, 646 S.W.2d 673, 674-75 (Tex.App.1983).
examined
Cited "see"
Duckworth v. Eagan
(4×)
See United States v. Contreras, 667 F. 2d 976, 979 (CA11), cert. denied, 459 U. S. 849 (1982); Coyote v. United States, 380 F. 2d 305, 308 (CA10), cert. denied, 389 U. S. 992 (1967); State v. Maluia, 56 Haw. 428, 431-435 , 539 P. 2d 1200, 1205-1207 (1975); Emler v. State, 259 Ind. 241, 243-244 , 286 N. E. 2d 408, 410-411 (1972); Jones v. State, 69 Wis. 2d 337, 343-345 , 230 N. W. 2d 677, 682-683 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ethel L. Hardin v. Gary Black, Warden
See, Campbell v. Wainwright, 738 F.2d 1573, 1578 (11th Cir.1984), adopting the reasoning of Martinez v. Harris, 675 F.2d 51 (2d Cir.), cert denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982). 7 .
cited
Cited "see"
Farinaro v. Kirk
See Martinez v. Harris, 675 F.2d 51 , 54-55 & n. 5 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Turner v. Sullivan
See Martinez v. Harris, 675 F.2d 51, 55 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Harper v. Bowen
See United States v. Contreras, 667 F.2d 976, 979 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982). .
cited
Cited "see"
Harper v. Bowen
See United States v. Contreras, 667 F.2d 976, 979 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982) 2 These regulations now appear at 20 C.F.R.
cited
Cited "see"
Holland v. Scully
See Martinez v. Harris, 675 F.2d 51 (2d Cir.) (establishing presumption that summary denial was based on procedural grounds), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Holland v. Scully
See Martinez v. Harris, 675 F.2d 51 (2d Cir.) (establishing presumption that summary denial was based on procedural grounds), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982). 58 Further, as the Magistrate pointed out, accepting Holland's view would undermine the procedural bar rule of N.Y.C.P.L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jesse James Jackson v. Charles C. Scully, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility
When the state appellate courts are silent as to the basis for dismissal of a claim, we have assumed that the basis for the dismissal is procedural default "only if the state prosecutor argued procedural default in the state appellate court.” Barber v. Scully, 731 F.2d 1073, 1075 (2d Cir.1984); see Martinez v. Harris, 675 F.2d 51, 54 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Armando Benitez
See United States v. Contreras, 667 F.2d 976, 980 (11th Cir.), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Calvin Carlos Campbell v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Corrections
See supra note 2.) 4 In deciding whether the state court reached the merits, we adopt the reasoning of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Martinez v. Harris, 675 F.2d 51, 54 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Grant v. Abrams
See Martinez v. Harris, 675 F.2d 51 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Charles Poe, III
See, e.g., Smith v. Bordenkircher, 671 F.2d 986, 986-87 (6th Cir.) (per cu-riam) (holding that “a lawyer representing two or more criminal defendants in a state trial [was not required to] withdraw as counsel for remaining defendants because of potential conflict of interest when one co-defendant turnfed] state’s evidence” because the district court’s finding that no actual conflict of interest existed was not clearly erroneous), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 848 , 103 S.Ct. 107 , 74 L.Ed.2d 96 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gerald Glen Boyden v. Barry Rubin Working Alternatives, Inc.
Compare Cal.Civ.P.Code Sec. 352(a)(3) (statute of limitations tolled if "at the time the cause of action accrued, ... [the injured party was] imprisoned on a criminal charge, or in execution under the sentence of a criminal court for a term less than for life") with Boag v. Chief of Police, City of Portland, 669 F.2d 587, 589 (9th Cir.) (holding that even if a state statute tolls the running of the statute while a plaintiff is incarcerated, the statute of limitations started running upon the prisoner's release on parole), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 (1982) and Deutch v. Hoffman, 165 Cal.App.3d …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Leonardo Chavez
Compare also United States v. Ulloa, 882 F.2d 41, 43 (2d Cir.1989) (failure to make timely motion constitutes waiver of that right even where trial court considers the merits), and United States v. Oldfield, 859 F.2d 392, 396 (6th Cir.1988) (issues raised in untimely motion to suppress are waived on appeal “even though the district court rules on the merits”), with United States v. Vasquez, 858 F.2d 1387, 1389 (9th Cir.1988) (when “district court considers and resolves an untimely suppression motion on its merits, we may review that decision on appeal”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rodolfo Morales, Paul Kolb, Jorge Manzano
In the present case Kolb’s explanation of his involvement is so unbelievable that “it gives rise to positive evidence in favor of the government.” United States v. Eley, 723 F.2d at 1525 ; see also United States v. Contreras, 667 F.2d 976, 980 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Walker v. Hood
See also Martinez v. Harris, 675 F.2d 51, 53 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fox v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Contreras, 667 F.2d 976 , 978 n. 2 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982); United States v. Gresham, 585 F.2d 103, 108 (5th Cir.1978); United States v. Schwartz, 535 F.2d 160, 163 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 906 , 97 S.Ct. 1175 , 51 L.Ed.2d 581 (1977); State v. Griffin, 117 Ariz. 54 , 570 P.2d 1067, 1069 (1977); State v. Neese, 126 Ariz. 499 , 616 P.2d 959, 966-67 (Ariz.App, 1980); People v. Martinez, 14 Cal.3d 533 , 121 Cal.Rptr. 611, 613-614 , 535 P.2d 739 , *1270 741-42 (1975); State v. Gerhardt, 97 Idaho 603 …
Balogh
v.
Hilton
v.
Hilton
No. 81-6848.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1982.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.