green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Northwest Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides v. Browner
See Donnell v. U.S., 682 F.2d 240, 251 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. de *66 nied, 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Pennsylvania v. Flaherty
See Donnell v. United States, 682 F.2d 240, 245-49 (D.C.Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
James Adams v. Johns-Manville Corporation, and Raymark Industries, Inc.
See Medtronic, Inc. v. Benda, 689 F.2d 645, 661 (7th Cir.1982) (defendants’ defense of lack of consideration in action for specific performance did not convert equitable action into legal one), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Deborah Biles, Administratrix of the Estate of Dennis B. Biles, Plaintiff v. United States
See Redhead v. United States, 686 F.2d 178, 181 (3rd Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1203 , 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 435 (1983). 3 This regulation applies to both VFR and IFR flights.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re \Agent Orange\" Product Liability Litigation. (Appeal of Attorneys' Fee Awards)"
Id.; accord Donnell v. United States, 682 F.2d 240, 251-52 (D.C.Cir.1982), cer t. denied, 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983); Chrapliwy v. Uniroyal, Inc., 670 F.2d 760, 768-69 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 956 , 103 S.Ct. 2428 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1983); Avalon Cinema Corp. v. Thompson, 689 F.2d 137, 140-41 (8th Cir.1982) (in banc).
discussed
Cited "see"
Molthan v. Temple University--Of of Commonwealth System of Higher Education
See Redhead v. United States, 686 F.2d 178, 184 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1203 , 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 435 (1983). 17 It is apparent from the record that Dr. Cohen's relationship with Mr. Lore was not an ideal attorney-client relationship from either participant's point of view.
cited
Cited "see"
Molthan v. Temple University
See Redhead v. United States, 686 F.2d 178, 184 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1203 , 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 435 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re \Agent Orange\" Product Liability Litigation"
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Donnell v. United States, 682 F.2d 240 , 255 n. 49 (D.C.Cir.1982) (“The special quality of one lawyer’s services provides no logical basis for granting all the lawyers a quality adjustment.”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983); Seigal v. Merrick, 619 F.2d 160,165 (2d Cir.1980) (suggesting that district court could award or withhold a multiplier based on relative productivity of legal theories propounded); In re Equity Funding Corp. of America Securities Litigation, 438 F.Supp. 1303, 1337-38 (C.D.Cal.1977) (awarding different multipliers to different…
discussed
Cited "see"
Murray v. Weinberger
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Donnell v. United States, 682 F.2d 240, 251 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983); Copeland v. Marshall, 641 F.2d 880, 896 (D.C.Cir.1980) (en banc). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gray v. Millea
The Second Circuit therefore has directed that the proper rule is for the district court to “consider the prevailing rates in the district in which the court sits.” Polk v. New York State Dep’t. of Correctional Servs., 722 F.2d 23, 25 (2d Cir.1983) (awarding attorneys’ fees under Section 1988); See also, Donnell v. United States, 682 F.2d 240, 251 (D.C.Cir.1982), ce rt. den’d 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
County of Cook v. Midcon Corp.
See also Medtronic Inc. v. Benda, 689 F.2d 645, 649-50 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1106 , 103 S.Ct. 731 , 74 L.Ed.2d 955 , 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
The County Of Cook v. Midcon Corporation
See also Medtronic Inc. v. Benda, 689 F.2d 645, 649-50 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1106 , 103 S.Ct. 731 , 74 L.Ed.2d 955 , 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carolyn Grove, Warren Riddle, and Sylvia Riddle v. Mead School District No. 354, Carolyn Grove, Warren Riddle, and Sylvia Riddle v. Mead School District No. 354, and Mead Education Association, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant
See Seattle School District No. 1 v. State of Washington, 633 F.2d 1338, 1349-50 (9th Cir.1980), aff'd, 458 U.S. 457 , 102 S.Ct. 3187 , 73 L.Ed.2d 896 (1982); see also Donnell v. United States, 682 F.2d 240, 245-49 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grove v. Mead School District No. 354
See Seattle School District No. 1 v. State of Washington, 633 F.2d 1338,1349-50 (9th Cir.1980), aff’d, 458 U.S. 457 , 102 S.Ct. 3187 , 73 L.Ed.2d 896 (1982); see also Donnell v. United States, 682 F.2d 240, 245-49 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.
See also Donnell v. United States, 682 F.2d 240, 251-252 (D.C.Cir.1982) (Wilkey, J., writing for a unanimous court) ("some attorneys may receive fees based on rates higher than they normally command if those higher rates are the norm for the jurisdiction in which the suit was litigated”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. Bolger
See, e.g., Donnell v. United States, 682 F.2d 240, 254 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983); Environmental Defense Fund v. Environmental Protection Agency, 672 F.2d 42 , 60 (D.C.Cir.1982); Sierra Club v. Gorsuch, 684 F.2d 972 (D.C.Cir.1982), reversed on other grounds, 462 U.S. 680 , 103 S.Ct. 3274 , 77 L.Ed.2d 938 (1983). 11 In Copeland III the court considered this form of adjustment noting that “if the ‘lodestar’ itself is based on present hourly rates, rather than the lesser rates applicable to the time period in which the services were …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hall v. City of Auburn
See also Donnell v. United States, 682 F.2d 240, 245-51 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983) (intervenors on side of United States in a successful suit entitled to fee award if they contributed substantially to success of litigation); E.E.O.C. v. Sage Realty Co., 521 F.Supp. 263, 269-70 (S.D.N.Y.1981) (intervenors entitled to attorneys’ fees to the extent that attorneys’ work does not duplicate that of government counsel); E.E.O.C. v. Murphy Motor Freight, supra, 488 F.Supp. at 389 (intervenors entitled to fees).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Redhead, Co-Executrix of the Estate of Redhead
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 82-908.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1983.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.