green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Ramon Mena
See United States v. Agrillo-Ladlad, 675 F.2d 905, 909 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 829 , 103 S.Ct. 66 , 74 L.Ed.2d 67 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles D. Price, United States of America v. Herman O. McMahan
See United States v. Barber, 668 F.2d 778 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 829 , 103 S.Ct. 66 , 74 L.Ed.2d 67 (1982); United States v. Shamy, 656 F.2d 951 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 939 , 102 S.Ct. 1429 , 71 L.Ed.2d 649 (1982); United States v. Mandel, 591 F.2d 1347 (4th Cir. 1979), not modified, 602 F.2d 653 (4th Cir.1979) (en banc), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 961 , 100 S.Ct. 1647 , 64 L.Ed.2d 236 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward O'Grady
(2×)
See United States v. Barber, 668 F.2d 778, 783 (4th Cir.) (voluntary payment of money is not extortion), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 829 , 103 S.Ct. 66 , 74 L.Ed.2d 67 (1982). 28 There is no question that Congress has the power to proscribe the receipt of gratuities by federal officials and perhaps may use the commerce power to proscribe some instances of such receipt by state and local officials.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John R. Bunney
See United States v. Agrillo-Ladlad, 675 F.2d 905 (7th Cir.) (naphtha-soaked newspapers), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 66 , 74 L.Ed.2d 67 (1982); United States v. Hepp, 656 F.2d 350 (8th Cir.1981) (uncontained methane gas).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gaines-Tabb v. Ici Explosives USA, Inc.
See also United States v. Agrillo-Ladlad, 675 F.2d 905 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 829 , 103 S.Ct. 66 , 74 L.Ed.2d 67 (1982) (referring to and quoting the legislative history of H.R. 18573,.the origin of the language ultimately chosen for the definition of “explosives” in 18 U.S.C. § 841 (d)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles D. Price, United States of America v. Herman O. McMahan
See also, United States v. Barber, 668 F.2d 778 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied 459 U.S. 829 , 103 S.Ct. 66 , 74 L.Ed.2d 67 (1982), United States v. Shamy, 656 F.2d 951 (4th Cir.1981) cert. denied 455 U.S. 939 , 102 S.Ct. 1429 , 71 L.Ed.2d 649 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Frank M. Reed, Jr., and David L. Smith
See e.g., United States v. Agrillo-Ladlad, 675 F.2d 905 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 829 , 103 S.Ct. 66 , 74 L.Ed.2d 67 (1982) (naphtha-soaked newspapers spread across the floor and ignited by a burning piece of paper); United States v. Hepp, 656 F.2d 350 (8th Cir.1981) (delayed ignition device consisting of a cigarette inserted in a matchbox and suspended by a thread into a gasoline laden atmosphere).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kenneth M. M.
v.
Claire A. M.
v.
Claire A. M.
No. 81-2165.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1982.
Published
Sup. Ct. Del. Certiorari denied.