green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Hermes Automation Technology, Inc. v. Hyundai Electronics Industries Co., Ltd.
But see New England Merchants National Bank v. Rosenfield, 679 F.2d 467 , 472 n. 9 (5th Cir.1982) (stating that in Massachusetts, the common law rule “remains applicable to contract cases”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1173 , 103 S.Ct. 819 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
East Coast Tender Service, Inc. v. Robert T. Winzinger, Inc., Utah Home Fire Insurance Company, Great Atlantic Insurance Company, Various Underwriters as Their Interests May Appear in the Term British Markets. And Robert T. Winzinger, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Utah Home Fire Insurance Company Great Atlantic Insurance Company Various Underwriters as Their Interests May Appear in the Term British Market, Appellants/cross-Appellees. Appeal of Utah Home Fire Insurance Company, Great Atlantic Insurance Company, Various Underwriters as Their Interests May Appear in the Term British Market, in No. 83-5824. Appeal of Robert T. Winzinger, Inc., in No. 83-5846. Appeal of East Coast Tender Service, Inc., in Nos. 83-5847 and 84-5408
See Tacynec v. City of Philadelphia, 687 F.2d 793 , 796 n. 2 (3d Cir.1982) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1172 , 103 S.Ct. 819 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1016 (argument raised for first time on appeal will not be considered unless it is of a constitutional magnitude).
discussed
Cited "see"
East Coast Tender Service, Inc. v. Robert T. Winzinger, Inc.
See Tacynec v. City of Philadelphia, 687 F.2d 793 , 796 n. 2 (3d Cir.1982) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1172 , 103 S.Ct. 819 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1016 (argument raised for first time on appeal will not be considered unless it is of a constitutional magnitude).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Judy Portis v. First National Bank of New Albany, Ms
FNB further argues that Portis’ testimony cannot overcome the quantum of evidence provided by FNB because it is “self-serving and speculative testimony ... subject to especially searching scrutiny.” Elliott, 714 F.2d at 564; See also New England Merchants Nat’l Bank v. Rosenfield, 679 F.2d 467, 473 (5th Cir.1982) (rejecting "unsupported self-serving testimony that flies in the teeth of unimpeachable contradictory evidence and universal experience”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1173 , 103 S.Ct. 819 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1983); Ralston Purina Co. v. Hobson, 554 F.2d 725, 728-29 (5th Cir.1977) …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
J. Vincent Scalea v. Scalea's Airport Service, Inc. And Michael Scalea, Sr., Individually, and Michael Scalea, Jr., Individually
See also Tacynec v. City of Philadelphia, 687 F.2d 793, 800 (3d *503 Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1172 , 103 S.Ct. 819 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1016 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas Earl Davis
See, e.g., New England Merchants National Bank v. Rosenfield, 679 F.2d 467 (5th Cir. Unit B 1982) (plaintiff’s testimony contradicted by “unimpeachable” witnesses and documentary evidence), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 1173 , 103 S.Ct. 819 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1983); Ralston Purina Co. v. Hobson, 554 F.2d 725, 729 (5th Cir.1977) (plaintiff’s testimony “thoroughly discredited by the testimony of both expert poultry nuitritionists ... and physical facts”); cf. Comfort Trane Air Conditioning v. Trane Co., 592 F.2d 1373 , 1383 (5th Cir.1979) (overwhelming contradictory evidence).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cory, Controller of the State of California
v.
Olson
v.
Olson
No. 82-917.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 24, 1983.
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.