green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.7 score
“retroactive rule of administrative agency is invalid, generally speaking, only if unreasonable”
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Texaco, Inc. v. Department of Energy
retroactive rule of administrative agency is invalid, generally speaking, only if unreasonable
discussed
Cited "see"
McIntyre v. State
(2×)
See State v. Rebstock, 418 So.2d 1306 (La.1982), cert. dismissed, 459 U.S. 1190 , 103 S.Ct. 841 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1032 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Elnora G. POPE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee
(2×)
Co. v. Commissioner, 297 U.S. 129, 135 , 56 S.Ct. 397, 400 , 80 L.Ed. 528 (1936); see also Pennzoil Co. v. United States Dep’t of Energy, 680 F.2d 156 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App.1982), cert. dismissed, 459 U.S. 1190 , 103 S.Ct. 841 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1032 (1983); Kenneth Culp Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 7:23 (2d ed. 1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pennzoil Co.
v.
United States Department of Energy
v.
United States Department of Energy
No. 81-2305.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 9, 1983.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Temporary Emergency Court of A… (1)
Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. Certio-rari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 53.