green
Positive treatment
7.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Walden
See State v. Harding, 137 Ariz. 278 , 670 P.2d 383 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1017 , 79 L.Ed.2d 246 (1984) (victim struggled with defendant before being rendered unable to resist).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bolton
See State v. Harding, 137 Ariz. 278, 291 , 670 P.2d 383, 396 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1017 , 79 L.Ed.2d 246 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lavers
(2×)
Id. at 306-07 , 107 S.Ct. at 1775; Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 199 , 96 S.Ct. 2909, 2937 , 49 L.Ed.2d 859 (1976) (plurality opinion); see State v. Harding, 137 Ariz. 278, 292 , 670 P.2d 383, 397 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1017 , 79 L.Ed.2d 246 (1984); State v. Richmond, 114 Ariz. 186, 195 , 560 P.2d 41, 50 (1976), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 915 , 97 S.Ct. 2988 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1101 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. White
(2×)
See State v. Harding, 137 Ariz. 278, 296-97 , 670 P.2d 383, 394-95 (1983) (Gordon, V.C.J., specially concurring), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1017 , 79 L.Ed.2d 246 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Worthen
(2×)
Williams, 656 P.2d at 453 ; accord State v. Harding, 137 Ariz. 278 , 670 P.2d 383 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1017 , 79 L.Ed.2d 246 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hennum v. City of Medina
(2×)
See generally Annot., 34 A.L.R.3d 720 (1970)." In Blair v. Boulger, 336 N.W.2d 337, 341 (N.D.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 995 , 104 S.Ct. 491 , 78 L.Ed.2d 685 , reh. denied, 465 U.S. 1014 , 104 S.Ct. 1018 , 79 L.Ed.2d 247 (1984), noting the difficulty that courts have had with the concept of "justification" we commented: "In our consideration of the first of these issues, we note that the concept of `justification' is not clearly defined in the law of interference with contractual relations.
discussed
Cited "see"
Pruett v. Thigpen
See Wainwright v. Goode, 465 U.S. 1014 , 104 S.Ct. 1017 , 78 L.Ed.2d 187 (1983) (even if Court of Appeals was correct in concluding that sentencing judge relied on facts unavailable to him under state law, it erred in reversing district court’s dismissal of Goode’s habeas petition since balancing of aggravating and mitigating circumstances did not result in arbitrary or freakish imposition of death penalty).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Roscoe
See State v. Harding, 137 Ariz. 278 , 670 P.2d 383 (1983), cert. denied, —— U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 1017 , 79 L.Ed.2d 246 (1984); State v. Lambright, 138 Ariz. 63 , 673 P.2d 1 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Ball
(2×)
See Davis v. Illinois, 464 U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 986 , 79 L.Ed.2d 222 (1984), reh’g denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1017 , 79 L.Ed.2d 247 (1984) (No. 82-6729).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Salazar
(2×)
Defendant’s argument that the statute does not adequately restrict a prosecutor's decision to seek the death penalty was rejected by the Supreme Court in Gregg, 428 U.S. at 199 , 96 S.Ct. at 2937 , 49 L.Ed.2d at 889 (pre-sentencing decisions by actors in the criminal justice system that may remove an accused from consideration for the death penalty are not unconstitutional); see also State v. Harding, 137 Ariz. 278, 292 , 670 P.2d 383, 397 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1017 , 79 L.Ed.2d 246 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bey
(2×)
Thus, in Alabama, the Court of Criminal Appeals "must independently weigh the aggravating and mitigating circumstances to determine whether they are sufficient to support a sentence of death.” Lewis v. State, 380 So.2d 970, 977 (Ala.Crim.App.1979) (emphasis added); see also State v. Harding, 137 Ariz. 278 , 670 P.2d 383, 398 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1017 , 79 L.Ed.2d 246 (1984) (Arizona Court must conduct independent review of the record of each capital case "to determine the correctness of the findings of the trial court as to aggravating and mitigating circumstances,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., Goode v. Wainwright, 704 F.2d 593 (11th Cir.1983), rev’d on other grounds, 464 U.S. 78 , 104 S.Ct. 378 , 78 L.Ed.2d 187 , reh. denied, 465 U.S. 1014 , 104 S.Ct. 1017 , 79 L.Ed.2d 247 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Trudeau v. State
See also State v. Harding, 137 Ariz. 278 , 670 P.2d 383, 389-90 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1017 , 79 L.Ed.2d 246 (1984) (public defender’s failure to file peremptory challenge against trial judge waived rights of nonconsenting defendant).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Nash
See also State v. Harding, 137 Ariz. 278 , 670 P.2d 383 (1983), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 1017 , 79 L.Ed.2d 246 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Ronwin
No. 83-899.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 23, 1984.
Cited by 9 opinions | Published
Petition for writ of mandamus denied. Justice Rehnquist and Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.