Mitlo v. United States, 464 U.S. 1018 (1983). · Go Syfert
Search
Mitlo v. United States, 464 U.S. 1018 (1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“marathon was an unwarranted extension of the williams act .... tender offerers were not the intended beneficiaries of the bill.”
42 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jewels Companies, Inc. v. Pay Less Drug Stores Northwest, Inc. (ca9, 1984-09-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Jewels Companies, Inc. v. Pay Less Drug Stores Northwest, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1984 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
marathon was an unwarranted extension of the williams act .... tender offerers were not the intended beneficiaries of the bill.
discussed Cited "see" Goodwin v. Goodwin
virginislands · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See, United States v. Milto, 714 F.2d 294, 296 (3rd Cir. 1983), cert. denied 104 S.Ct. 550 ; and Rhode Island v. Innis, 100 S.Ct. 1682, 1689 (1980). (b) Notice to victim but not attacker Mr. Goodwin correctly asserts that victims of domestic violence are treated differently to their attackers with respect to notice.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Hoye
E.D. Va. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Mitlo, 714 F.2d 294, 296-97 , cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1018 , 104 S.Ct. 550 , 78 L.Ed.2d 724 (1983). 7 .
discussed Cited "see" Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc.
Del. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Buffalo Forge Co. v. Ogden Corp., 717 F.2d 757 (2nd Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1018 , 104 S.Ct. 550 , 78 L.Ed.2d 724 (1983); Data Probe Acquisition Corp. v. Datatab, Inc., 722 F.2d 1 (2nd Cir.1983); cert. denied 465 U.S. 1052 , 104 S.Ct. 1326 , 79 L.Ed.2d 722 (1984); but see Mobil Corp. v. Marathon Oil Co., 669 F.2d 366 (6th Cir.1981).
discussed Cited "see" Hanson Trust PLC v. ML SCM Acquisition Inc. (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
2d Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
N.Y.Bus.Corp.Law § 717 (McKinney Supp. 1984); see Buffalo Forge Co. v. Ogden Corp., 555 F.Supp. 892, 904, 905 (W.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 717 F.2d 757 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1018 , 104 S.Ct. 550 , 78 L.Ed.2d 724 (1983).
discussed Cited "see" Hanson Trust Plc v. Ml Scm Acquisition Inc. (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
2d Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
New York law provides that 83 [i]n performing his duties, a director shall be entitled to rely on information, opinions, reports or statements including financial statements and other data, in each case prepared or presented by ... counsel, public accountants or other persons as to matters which the director believes to be within such person's professional or expert competence.... 84 N.Y.Bus.Corp.Law Sec. 717 (McKinney Supp.1984); see Buffalo Forge Co. v. Ogden Corp., 555 F.Supp. 892, 904, 905 (W.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 717 F.2d 757 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1018 , 104 S.Ct. 550 , 78 L.Ed.2d 7…
cited Cited "see" Hanson Trust PLC v. SCM Corp.
S.D.N.Y. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Buffalo Forge Co. v. Ogden Corp., 717 F.2d 757 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1018 , 104 S.Ct. 550 , 78 L.Ed.2d 724 (1983).
discussed Cited "see" Terrydale Liquidating Trust v. Barness
S.D.N.Y. · 1984 · signal: accord · confidence high
Mathes, 241 Del.Ch. 494 , 199 A.2d 548, 554-55 (1964); accord Buffalo Forge Co. v. Ogden Corp., 555 F.Supp. 892, 904 (W.D.N.Y.1983), aff'd, 717 F.2d 757 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 550 , 78 L.Ed.2d 724 (1983).
cited Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Orzel
pactcomplbucks · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See U.S. v. Mitlo, 714 F.2d 294 (3rd Circuit Ct. of Appeals, 1983) U.S. cert. den’d. 104 S. Ct. 550 and cases cited therein.
discussed Cited "see" Pogostin v. Rice
Del. · 1984 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord Buffalo Forge Co. v. Ogden Corp., 717 F.2d 757, 759 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 550 , 78 L.Ed.2d 724 (1983); Panter v. Marshall Field & Co., 646 F.2d 271, 295 (7th Cir.1981) (applying Delaware law); Treadway Cos., Inc. v. Care Corp., 638 F.2d 357 (2d Cir.1980); Crouse-Hinds Co. v. Inter-North, Inc., 634 F.2d 690 (2d Cir.1980); Johnson v. Trueblood, 629 F.2d 287 (3d Cir.1980) (applying Delaware law).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jewel Companies v. Pay Less Drug Stores Northwest, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1984 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Mobil Corp. v. Marathon Oil Co., 669 F.2d 366, 376 (6th Cir.1981) ("The purpose of the Williams Act, protection of the target shareholders, requires that Mobil and any other interested bidder be permitted an equal opportunity to compete in the marketplace ____”) with Buffalo Forge Co. v. Ogden Corp., 717 F.2d 757, 760 (2d Cir.1983), cert, denied— U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 550 , 78 L.Ed.2d 724 (1983) ("Marathon was an unwarranted extension of the Williams Act____ Tender Offerers were not the intended beneficiaries of the bill.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mitlo
v.
United States
No. 83-675.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 12, 1983.
464 U.S. 1018
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 90%
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.