Frame v. South Bend Cmty. Sch. Corp., 464 U.S. 815 (1983). · Go Syfert
Search
Frame v. South Bend Cmty. Sch. Corp., 464 U.S. 815 (1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
21 citation events across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Barrett v. United States (nysd, 1987-05-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Barrett v. United States
S.D.N.Y. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Nevin v. United States, 696 F.2d 1229 (1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 815 , 104 S.Ct. 70 , 78 L.Ed.2d 84 (1983).
discussed Cited "see" John N. Begay and His Wife, Mable Lee Begay Kee Atcitty Bob B. Begay and His Wife, Mae Begay v. United States of America, Phillip Anderson, Marry John Badoni, Hoskie R. Barton, Clyde Begay, Harvey Lee Begay and Herbert N. Begay v. United States
9th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Nevin v. United States, 696 F.2d 1229 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 70 , 78 L.Ed.2d 84 (1983); Olsen v. Mexico, 729 F.2d 641 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 295 , 83 L.Ed.2d 230 (1984); Grunnet v. United States, 730 F.2d 573 (9th Cir.1984).
discussed Cited "see" Begay v. United States
9th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Nevin v. United States, 696 F.2d 1229 (9th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 70 , 78 L.Ed.2d 84 (1983); Olsen v. Mexico, 729 F.2d 641 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 295 , 83 L.Ed.2d 230 (1984); Grunnet v. United States, 730 F.2d 573 (9th Cir.1984).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Richard McCarthy v. United States
9th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Nevin v. United States, 696 F.2d 1229, 1231 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 815 , 104 S.Ct. 70 , 78 L.Ed.2d 84 (1983) (whether discretionary function exemption applies under FTCA question of subject matter jurisdiction); Wright v. United States, 719 F.2d 1032, 1034 (9th Cir.1983) (court lacks subject matter jurisdiction if claim against United States under FTCA falls within statutory exception); c.f., Mitchell v. Occidental Ins., Medicare, 619 F.2d 28, 30 (9th Cir.1980) (no constitutional right to sue the United States without its consent).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Clyde E. Williamson, D/B/A Triangle 44 Farms v. United States Department of Agriculture
5th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Nevin v. United States, 696 F.2d 1229, 1230 (9th Cir.) (“[WJhether an act or omission falls within the exemption depends generally on whether that act or omission occurred at the planning level or the operational level of government.”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 815 , 104 S.Ct. 70 , 78 L.Ed.2d 84 (1983); Gross v. United States, 676 F.2d 295, 302 (8th Cir.1982) ("The discretionary function exception covers only decisions made at the policy or planning level. ...
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Frame
v.
South Bend Community School Corp.
No. 82-1713.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1983.
464 U.S. 815
Published

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.