green
Positive treatment
5.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
in Re: Thomas Lytle and Ellen Lytle
In Chambers v. Mis- prove the hazard in the sense in which a sissippi, 410 U.S. 284, 302 , 93 S.Ct. 1038 , claim is usually required to be established in 1949, 85 L.Ed.2d 297, 312 (1978), the Su- court, he would be compelled to surrender preme Court aaid, in the course of a discus- the very protection which the privilege is sion of due proceBS: "Few rights are more designed to guarantee." Hoffman, 341 U.S. fundamental than that of an accused to at 486, 71 S.Ct. at 818, 95 L.Ed. at 1124. present witnesses in his own defense." Thus a practice has developed whereby, out- [4] The District Court's …
cited
Cited "see"
Jones v. State
See Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 , 93 S.Ct. 1038 , 85 L.Ed.2d 297 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Elmer Britton v. South Bend Community School Corporation
(2×)
See, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 2015 , 85 L.Ed.2d 298 (subject matter summary of case recently docketed); Deveraux v. Geary, 765 F.2d 268 , 275 n. 6 (1st Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert T. Deveraux v. William J. Geary, and Plaintiff-Class in Culbreath v. Dukakis, Intervenors-Appellees
(2×)
See Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education, 746 F.2d 1152 (6th Cir.1984), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 2015 , 85 L.Ed.2d 298 (1985). 6 Affirmed. 1 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Zbaraz v. Hartigan
(2×)
See --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 2015 , 85 L.Ed.2d 297 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pearl Investment Company, a California Partnership v. City and County of San Francisco, a Municipal Corporation
(2×)
See, e.g., Playtime Theaters, Inc. v. City of Renton, 748 F.2d 527 (9th Cir.1984) (zoning of adult theaters), prob. juris, noted, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 2015 , 85 L.Ed.2d 297 (1985); J-R Distributors, Inc. v. Eikenberry, 725 F.2d 482 (9th Cir.1984) (anti-obscenity statute), rev’d on other grounds sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. Pornography Com'n of Lower Southampton
(2×)
See, e.g., Playtime Theaters, Inc. v. City of Renton, 748 F.2d 527, 532 (9th Cir.1984), cert. granted on other grounds, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 2015 , 85 L.Ed.2d 297 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Donald A. Rado v. State of Connecticut
See, e. g., Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284, 300-01 , 93 S.Ct. 1038 , 85 L.Ed.2d 297 (1973); United States v. White, supra, 553 F.2d at 314 . *581 In short, we conclude that Rado’s right of confrontation was not violated by the state’s attorney’s reading from the transcript of Hall’s guilty plea proceeding for the following reasons: 1. the recitation was neither “crucial” to the state’s case against Rado nor “devastating” to his defense; 2.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
City of Renton
v.
Playtime Theatres, Inc.
v.
Playtime Theatres, Inc.
No. 84-1360.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 15, 1985.
Cited by 21 opinions | Published
Appeal from C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of[*1014] National League of Cities et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Probable jurisdiction noted.