green
Positive treatment
5.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Evans v. Atwood
See Krodel v. Young, 748 F.2d 701, 706 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985); see also Coburn v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., 711 F.2d 339, 342 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 994 , 104 S.Ct. 488 , 78 L.Ed.2d 683 (1983) (stating that the plaintiff “at all times retains the burden of persuasion”).
cited
Cited "see"
Sisay v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
See Krodel v. Young, 748 F.2d 701, 707 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Paul Paquin v. Federal National Mortgage Association
See Krodel v. Young, 748 F.2d 701, 709 (D.C.Cir.1984) (employer’s failure to follow own procedures probative of discrimination), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985); Johnson v. Lehman, 679 F.2d 918, 922 (D.C.Cir.1982) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Carsten
See United States v. Huebner, 752 F.2d 1235, 1240-41 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 50 (1985); Akers, 785 F.2d at 819 ; Avoyelles Sportsmen’s League, Inc. v. Marsh, 715 F.2d 897 , 926 (5th Cir.1983); United States v. Cumberland Farms, 647 F.Supp. 1166, 1176 (D.Mass.1986), aff'd, 826 F.2d 1151 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S.Ct. 1016 , 98 L.Ed.2d 981 (1988); United States v. Brace, 41 F.3d 117 (3rd Cir.1994), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1158 , 115 S.Ct. 2610 , 132 L.Ed.2d 854 (1995) The plain language of 33 U.S.C. 1344(f)(2) entails two claus…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lambert
See United States v. Huebner, 752 F.2d 1235, 1239 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 50 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sargent County Water Resource District
(2×)
See United States v. Huebner, 752 F.2d 1235, 1240-41 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 50 (1985); United States v. Akers, 785 F.2d 814, 819 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 828 , 107 S.Ct. 107 , 93 L.Ed.2d 56 (1986); Avoyelles Sportsmen’s League, Inc. v. Marsh, 715 F.2d 897 , 926 (5th Cir.1983); United States v. Cumberland Farms, 647 F.Supp. 1166, 1176 (D.Mass. 1986), aff'd, 826 F.2d 1151 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S.Ct. 1016 , 98 L.Ed.2d 981 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Aluminum Co. of America
See United States v. Huebner, 752 F.2d 1235, 1240-41 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 50 (1985) (exemptions from CWA permit requirements must be given a narrow construction against the polluter, to effectuate the Act’s purpose of controlling discharges); United States v. City of Hoboken, 675 F.Supp. 189, 195-96 (D.N.J.1987) (EPA’s interpretation of a permit should govern the determination of a permit’s meaning).
cited
Cited "see"
Welsing v. Government of the District of Columbia
See Krodel v. Young, 748 F.2d 701, 706 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mena
See United States v. Benz, 740 F.2d 903, 910-11 (11th Cir.1984) (discussing Fifth Circuit pattern jury charge for conspiracy), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cumberland Farms of Connecticut, Inc.
See United States v. Huebner, 752 F.2d 1235, 1241 (7th Cir.) (upholding narrow interpretation of statutory agricultural exemption from permit requirement), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 50 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Victor Montano Disla
Accord United States v. Benz, 740 F.2d 903, 911 (11th Cir.1984), reh’g denied en banc, 756 F.2d 885 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 106 S.Ct. 62 (1985); United States v. Ajlouny, 629 F.2d 830 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1111 , 101 S.Ct. 920 , 66 L.Ed.2d 840 (1980); United States v. Scott, 659 F.2d 585, 589 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 854 , 103 S.Ct. 121 , 74 L.Ed.2d 105 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Lerchenstein
See United States v. Lavelle, 751 F.2d 1266, 1278 (D.C.Cir.) cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles Carter v. District of Columbia, Maurice Turner, Chief, Metropolitan Police Department Charles Carter v. District of Columbia
The Advisory Committee Notes continue: “The availability of other means of proof may also be an appropriate factor.” Id.; accord United States v. LaVelle, 751 F.2d 1266, 1278 (D.C.Cir.) (taking into account whether “the manner in which the government presented the evidence guarded against unfair prejudice”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985); United States v. Foskey, supra, 636 F.2d at 524 n. 6.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert W. Akers and John Doe Equipment Operator
See United States v. Huebner, 752 F.2d 1235, 1240-41 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 50 (1985); Avoyelles Sportsmen’s League, Inc. v. Marsh, 715 F.2d 897 , 925 n. 44 (5th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
TMT North America, Inc. v. the Magic Touch GmbH
“A complaining party must prove that the order was violated by ‘clear and convincing’ evidence.” Able, 870 F.2d at 1163 ; See, e.g., United States v. Huebner, 752 F.2d 1235, 1241 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 50 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Antonio Ramon Washington, United States of America v. Carl Gedde
See, e.g., United States v. Lavelle, 751 F.2d 1266, 1277 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.s. 817, 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sonia Jacobs A/K/A Sonia Linder v. Harry K. Singletary, Marta Villacorta and Jim Smith
See, e.g., United States v. Benz, 740 F.2d 903, 915-16 (11th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985) (no Brady violation where evidence would have provided additional support for cross examination but same information substantially otherwise presented to jury).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Owens
See also United States v. Adams, 799 F.2d 665, 671 (11th Cir.1986) (when district court withdraws evidence from the jury with an instruction to disregard it, “ ‘the error is cured unless the evidence is so highly prejudicial as to render the error incurable’ ”) (quoting United States v. Benz, 740 F.2d 903, 916 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985)), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1070 , 107 S.Ct. 2464 , 95 L.Ed.2d 873 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Stotler and Company, Cross-Appellee v. William J. Able, Cross-Appellant
See, e.g., United States v. Huebner, 752 F.2d 1235, 1241 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 50 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Spagnola v. Mathis
Turner v. McIntosh, — U.S.-, 108 S.Ct. 2861 , 101 L.Ed.2d 898 (1988); Kotarski v. Cooper, 799 F.2d 1342, 1348-49 (9th Cir.1986) (holding that probationary employee could pursue Bivens action against supervisor), vacated, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 2861 , 101 L.Ed.2d 897 (1988); see also Krodel v. Young, 748 F.2d 701 , 712 n. 6 (D.C.Cir.1984) (suggesting in dictum that statutory right to petition OSC, without more, would not preclude a Bivens claim for damages), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985); Note, Bivens Doctrine in Flux: Statutory Preclusion of a Constitutional…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joseph C. Spagnola, Jr. v. William Mathis, Office of Management and Budget, Joseph C. Spagnola v. William Mathis, Joseph C. Spagnola, Jr. v. William Mathis, Office of Management & Budget Michael E. Hubbard v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Administrator
Turner v. McIntosh, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 2861 , 101 L.Ed.2d 898 (1988); Kotarski v. Cooper, 799 F.2d 1342, 1348-49 (9th Cir.1986) (holding that probationary employee could pursue Bivens action against supervisor), vacated, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 2861 , 101 L.Ed.2d 897 (1988); see also Krodel v. Young, 748 F.2d 701 , 712 n. 6 (D.C.Cir.1984) (suggesting in dictum that statutory right to petition OSC, without more, would not preclude a Bivens claim for damages), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985); Note, Bivens Doctrine in Flux: Statutory Preclusion of a Constit…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arakawa v. Reagan
In Bush , the Supreme Court noted that "Constitutional challenges to agency action, such as the First Amendment claims raised by petitioner, are fully cognizable within [the CSRA] system.” 462 U.S. at 386 , 103 S.Ct. at 2415 ; see also Krodel v. Young, 748 F.2d 701, 712 (D.C.Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985) (opportunity for MSPB and Federal Circuit review provides "meaningful remedies” for First Amendment violation); 5 U.S.C. § 7701 (c)(2)(C) (MSPB may reverse any agency decision "not in accordance with law’’); cf. Rose v. Dep't of Health an…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sealy Mattress Company of Michigan, Incorporated v. Sealy, Incorporated
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Huebner, 752 F.2d 1235, 1244 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 50 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Capital City Press, Inc.
v.
Buratt
v.
Buratt
No. 84-1625.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1985.
Published
Ct. App. La., 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.