In re Tripati, 474 U.S. 1048 (1986). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Tripati, 474 U.S. 1048 (1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
47 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Taylor (ca7, 1994-04-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Taylor
7th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Rovetuso, 768 F.2d 809, 821-22 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1076, 1106 , 106 S.Ct. 838 , 1951 (1986); Fryer v. Nix, 775 F.2d 979, 993-94 (8th Cir.1985).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Arnold Sherlock and Ronald Charley (2×)
9th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Rovetuso, 768 F.2d 809, 818 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1076 , 106 S.Ct. 838 , 88 L.Ed.2d 809 (1986); accord United States v. Baker, 850 F.2d 1365, 1371 (9th Cir.1988).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Wesley Bucey
7th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Rovetuso, 768 F.2d 809, 824 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1076 , 106 S.Ct. 838 , 88 L.Ed.2d 809 (1986), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1106 , 106 S.Ct. 1951 , 90 L.Ed.2d 360 (1986).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Arnold Sherlock and Ronald Charley
9th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Rovetuso, 768 F.2d 809, 818 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1076 , 106 S.Ct. 838 , 88 L.Ed.2d 809 (1986); accord United States v. Baker, 850 F.2d 1365, 1371 (9th Cir.1988).
discussed Cited "see" Joseph Code v. Charles M. Montgomery
11th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jones v. Smith, 772 F.2d 668, 673-74 (11th Cir.1985) (failure to request continuance not ineffective where there was no showing that alibi witnesses existed), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 838 , 88 L.Ed.2d 809 (1986); Gravenmeir v. United States, 399 F.2d 677 (9th Cir.1968) (same).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. James Boucher
7th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
United States v. Santiago, 582 F.2d 1128, 1135 (7th Cir.1978); see United States v. Rovetuso, 768 F.2d 809, 821 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 838 , 88 L.Ed.2d 809 (1986); United States v. Gironda, 758 F.2d 1201, 1217 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 523 , 88 L.Ed.2d 456 (1985).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Louis Kenneth Risken
8th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Rovetuso, 768 F.2d 809, 823-24 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 838 , 88 L.Ed.2d 809 (1986); United States v. Lester, 749 F.2d 1288,1291-96 (9th Cir.1984); United States v. Wesley, 748 F.2d 962, 963-65 (5th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 2664 , 86 L.Ed.2d 281 (1985); United States v. Beatty, 587 F.Supp. 1325, 1329-33 (E.D.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Sapp
N.D. Cal. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
"Attempt is only actionable when a specific federal criminal statute makes it impermissible to attempt to commit the crime.” , United States v. Anderson, 89 F.3d 1306, 1314 (6th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1100 , 117 S.Ct. 786 , 136 L.Ed.2d 728 (1997); see also United States v. Rovetuso, 768 F.2d 809, 821 (7th Cir.1985) ("There is no general Federal statute proscribing an attempt, and therefore it is actionable only where, as in the present case, a specific criminal statute makes it impermissible to attempt to commit the crime.”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1076 , 106 S.Ct. 838 , 88 L.Ed…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Parker v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Jones v. Smith , 599 F. Supp. 1292 , 1304 (S.D.Ala. 1984), affirmed, 772 F.2d 668 , 672-73 (11th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1073 , 106 S.Ct. 838 , 88 L.Ed.2d 809 (1986); United States v. Ramirez-Rizo , 809 F.2d 1069 , 1071-72 (5th Cir. 1987).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Doby
N.D. Ind. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
The Seventh Circuit has held that “in order to meet the [admissibility requirements of Rule 801], the government must prove, by a preponderance of independent evidence, which is not hearsay, that the conspiracy existed, that the defendant and the declarant were members of the conspiracy and that the offered statement was made during the course of and in furtherance of the conspiracy.” United States v. Boucher, 796 F.2d 972, 974 (7th Cir.1986) (citing United States v. Santiago, 582 F.2d 1128, 1135 (7th Cir.1978)); see also United States v. Rovetuso, 768 F.2d 809, 821 (7th Cir.1985), cert. d…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Tripati
No. 85-5845.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 1986.
474 U.S. 1048
Published

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.