green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.1 score
“if anything, the intentional "scheme" requirement of wire and mail fraud is a more difficult standard to meet than the "scienter" requirement under 10(b).”
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Integrated Resources Real Estate Ltd. Partnerships Securities Litigation
if anything, the intentional "scheme" requirement of wire and mail fraud is a more difficult standard to meet than the "scienter" requirement under 10(b).
cited
Cited "see"
Wasserman v. Maimonides Medical Center
See.United States v. Rodoliiz, 786 F.2d 77 , 80 (2d Cir.) (stating the elements of mail fraud), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 826 , 107 S.Ct. 102 , 93 L.Ed.2d 52 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Colony at Holbrook, Inc. v. Strata G.C., Inc.
See United States v. Rodolitz, 786 F.2d 77, 80 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 826 , 107 S.Ct. 102 , 93 L.Ed.2d 52 (1986); Beck v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 820 F.2d 46, 49-50 (2d Cir.1987), cert, denied, 484 U.S. 1005 , 108 S.Ct. 698 , 98 L.Ed.2d 650 (1988); Asbeka Industries v. Travelers Indem.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
East Lake Methodist Episcopal Church, Inc. v. Trustees of the Peninsula-Delaware Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church, Inc.
See, e.g., Bishop and Diocese of Colorado v. Mote, Colo.Supr., 716 P.2d 85, 96, 103-09 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 826 , 107 S.Ct. 102 , 93 L.Ed.2d 52 (1986) (applying neutral principles of law approach in determination of trust for benefit of the general church); Babcock Memorial Presbyterian Church v. Presbytery of Baltimore of the United Presbyterian Church in the United States, Md.Ct.App., 296 Md. 573 , 464 A.2d 1008 , 1016-17 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1027 , 104 S.Ct. 1287 , 79 L.Ed.2d 689 (1984) (using both a polity and neutral principles of law analysis); Fonken v. Community Church of…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
DeBose Ex Rel. DeBose v. Bear Valley Church of Christ
(2×)
See also Bishop & Diocese v. Mote, 716 P.2d 85 (Colo.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 826 , 107 S.Ct. 102 , 93 L.Ed.2d 52 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Local 1804-1, International Longshoremen's Ass'n
See, e.g., United States v. Rodolitz, 786 F.2d 77, 80 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 826 , 107 S.Ct. 102 , 93 L.Ed.2d 52 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of Trinity-St. Michael's Parish, Inc. v. Episcopal Church in the Diocese
See, e.g., Bishop & Diocese of Cobrado v. Mote, 716 P.2d 85, 105 (Colo.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 826 , 107 S. Ct. 102 , 93 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aglikin v. Kovacheff
OPINION 1 The State has a cognizable interest in the peaceful resolution of internal church disputes which are concerned with control or ownership of church property, and the civil courts have general authority to resolve such controversies. ( Jones v. Wolf (1979), 443 U.S. 595, 602 , 61 L.Ed.2d 775, 784 , 99 S.Ct. 3020, 3025 ; see also Bishop & Diocese v. Mote (Colo. 1986), 716 P.2d 85, 90-91 , cert. denied (1986), 479 U.S. 826 , 93 L.Ed.2d 52 , 107 S.Ct. 102 .) However, resolution of church property disputes by the civil courts is limited by the first amendment to the United States Consti…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Union Oil Company of California
v.
Superior Court of California, Orange County (Buchanan, Real Party in Interest)
v.
Superior Court of California, Orange County (Buchanan, Real Party in Interest)
No. 85-2091.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1986.
Cited by 50 opinions | Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.