green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Citizens Federal Bank v. Cardian Mortgage Corp. (In Re Cardian Mortgage Corp.)
But see Davis v. Lukhard, 106 F.R.D. 317, 318 (E.D.Va.1984), vacated as *263 moot, 788 F.2d 973 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 868 , 107 S.Ct. 231 , 93 L.Ed.2d 157 (1986); Johnson v. City of Richmond, 102 F.R.D. 623, 623-24 (E.D.Va.1984); Durkin v. Taylor, 444 F.Supp. 879, 889 (E.D.Va.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Rene Ponce
(2×)
See United States v. Martin, 790 F.2d 1215, 1219 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 868 , 107 S.Ct. 231 , 93 L.Ed.2d 157 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Strub v. Public Service Co.
See Martin, 3 F.3d at 1415 (describing considerations relevant to a determination of whether a continuing violation exists, citing Berry v. Board of Supervisors Of Louisiana State Univ., 715 F.2d 971, 981 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 868 , 107 S.Ct. 231 , 93 L.Ed.2d 157 (1986)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Timothy Jones, Charles Wayne Norman, Perry Cecil Patronelli, and Richard Keith Hagler
See United States v. Martin, 790 F.2d 1215, 1219 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 107 S.Ct. 231 , 93 L.Ed.2d 157 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Barnes
The agreement to prove conspiracy can be silent, United States v. Williams-Hendricks, 805 F.2d 496, 502 (5th Cir.1986); “tacit[J or [only a] mutual understanding among the parties.” United States v. Ellzey, 874 F.2d 324, 328 (6th Cir.1989); see, e.g., United States v. Martin, 790 F.2d 1215, 1219 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 868 , 107 S.Ct. 231 , 93 L.Ed.2d 157 (1986); United States v. Alemany Rivera, 781 F.2d 229, 234 (1st Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1086 , 106 S.Ct. 1469 , 89 L.Ed.2d 725 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pappas v. Buck Consultants
The most authoritative report is a Conference Report acted upon by both Houses and therefore unequivocally representing the will of both Houses as the joint legislative body." Commissioner v. Acker, 361 U.S. 87, 94 , 80 S.Ct. 144, 148 , 4 L.Ed.2d 127 (1959) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting); see also Payne v. Federal Land Bank, 916 F.2d 179 , 182 (4th Cir.1990) (" 'Inasmuch as the Conference Report represents the final statement of the terms agreed upon by both houses of Congress, next to the statute itself, it is the most persuasive evidence of the Congressional intent behind the enactment of the…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pappas v. Buck Consultants, Inc.
The most authoritative report is a Conference Report acted upon by both Houses and therefore unequivocally representing the will of both Houses as the joint legislative body.” Commissioner v. Acker, 361 U.S. 87, 94 , 80 S.Ct. 144, 148 , 4 L.Ed.2d 127 (1959) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting); see also Payne v. Federal Land Bank, 916 F.2d 179 , 182 (4th Cir.1990) (“ ‘Inasmuch as the Conference Report represents the final statement of the terms agreed upon by both houses of Congress, next to the statute itself, it is the most persuasive evidence of the Congressional intent behind the enactment …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Antonia Paris v. Department of Housing and Urban Development
(2×)
See, e.g., Davis v. Lukhard, 788 F.2d 973, 981 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 231 , 93 L.Ed.2d 157 (1986); Sierra Club v. Clark, 755 F.2d 608, 615 (8th Cir.1985); Monterey Coal Co. v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission, 743 F.2d 589, 598 (7th Cir.1984). 62 Our resolution of this dilemma is suggested by the D.C.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Staton
v.
Lukhard, Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Social Services
v.
Lukhard, Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Social Services
No. 86-5288.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1986.
Cited by 50 opinions | Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.