green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Timothy Wayne Morrow (89-5418/5708) and George Mooneyham (89-5710)
(2×)
We are mindful that "the plain error exception to the contemporaneous-objection rule is to be 'used sparingly, solely in those circumstances in which a miscarriage of justice would otherwise result.' " Id. at 15 , 105 S.Ct. at 1046 (quoting United States v. Frady, 456 U.S. 152, 163 , 102 S.Ct. 1584, 1592 , 71 L.Ed.2d 816 (1982)); see also United States v. Hook, 781 F.2d 1166, 1172 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 882 , 107 S.Ct. 269 , 93 L.Ed.2d 246 (1986) (in the absence of a contemporaneous objection an improper jury instruction will rarely justify reversal of a criminal conviction). 28 Th…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, in 91-1201 v. Thomas L. McGill Jr., in 91-1122
(2×)
See also United States v. Hook, 781 F.2d 1166, 1169 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 882 , 107 S.Ct. 269 , 93 L.Ed.2d 246 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Warren Eugene Wake
See, e.g., United States v. Whittington, 783 F.2d 1210, 1215 (5th Cir.) ("A decision that a document is authentic and, therefore, admissible does not determine whether the evidence will be credited by the trier of fact."), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 882 , 107 S.Ct. 269 , 93 L.Ed.2d 246 (1986); United States v. Serna, 799 F.2d 842, 850 (2d Cir. 1986) ("Here, the testimony ... made out a prima facie case connecting the exhibit to the defendant; the evidence was thus properly submitted to the jury for a determination on its authenticity.”), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1013 , 107 S.Ct. 1887 , 95 L.Ed.2d …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Maldonado-Rivera
United States v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Corp., 871 F.2d 1181, 1199 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 324 , 107 L.Ed.2d 314 (1989); United States v. Lieberman, 637 F.2d 95, 102-03 (2d Cir.1980); see also United States v. Paone, 782 F.2d 386, 390 (2d Cir.) (mere “idle chatter” does not satisfy Rule 801(d)(2)(E)), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 882 , 107 S.Ct. 269 , 93 L.Ed.2d 246 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Maldonado-Rivera
United States v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Corp., 871 F.2d 1181, 1199 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 324 , 107 L.Ed.2d 314 (1989); United States v. Lieberman, 637 F.2d 95, 102-03 (2d Cir.1980); see also United States v. Paone, 782 F.2d 386, 390 (2d Cir.) (mere "idle chatter" does not satisfy Rule 801(d)(2)(E)), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 882 , 107 S.Ct. 269 , 93 L.Ed.2d 246 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Peter Monsanto
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Paone, 782 F.2d 386, 392 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 269 , 93 L.Ed.2d 2 -6 (1986); In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Doe, 781 F.2d 238, 250-51 (2d Cir.1985) (in banc), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1108 , 106 S.Ct. 1515 , 89 L.Ed.2d 914 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hook
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 85-1869.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1986.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.