green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State of California v. Montrose Chemical Corporation of California Pcb Industrial, Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. Stauffer Management Company Ici American Holdings, Inc. Atkemix Thirty-Seven, Inc. Rhone-Poulenc Basic Chemicals Company, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Cross-Claimants-Appellees. (Two Cases). United States of America v. Montrose Chemical Corporation of California Pcb Industrial, Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. Stauffer Management Company Ici American Holdings, Inc. Atkemix Thirty-Seven, Inc. Rhone-Poulenc Basic Chemicals Company, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Cross-Claimants-Appellees
See United States v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 785 F.2d 777, 780 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 988 , 107 S.Ct. 580 , 93 L.Ed.2d 583 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
California v. Montrose Chemical Corp.
See United States v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 785 F.2d 777, 780 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 988 , 107 S.Ct. 580 , 93 L.Ed.2d 583 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David S. O'Bryant
See United States v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 785 F.2d 777, 778-79 (9th Cir.) (collecting cases), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 988 , 107 S.Ct. 580 , 93 L.Ed.2d 583 (1986); United States v. Grady, 544 F.2d 598, 601 (2d Cir.1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Stephen Yagman v. Republic Insurance Cna Insurance Valley Forge Insurance
See United States v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 785 F.2d 777 (9th Cir.) (reversing and remanding for assignment to a different judge), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 988 , 107 S.Ct. 580 , 93 L.Ed.2d 583 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Don C. Davis, United States of America v. Daniel M. Burke
See United States v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 785 F.2d 777, 779 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 988 , 107 S.Ct. 580 , 93 L.Ed.2d 583 (1986); United States v. Panebianco, 543 F.2d 447, 454 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103 , 97 S.Ct. 1129 , 51 L.Ed.2d 553 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kinney ex rel. Kinney v. Sullivan
See however, Imani on Behalf of Hayes v. Heckler, 797 F.2d 508, 511 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 988 , 107 S.Ct. 580 , 93 L.Ed.2d 583 (1986) (Missouri law of intestate succession requires that after the death of the putative father, paternity must be established by clear and convincing evidence); Kelani v. Bowen, 684 F.Supp. 490, 496 (M.D.Tenn.1988) (Tennessee statute requires clear and convincing evidence to establish paternity by a child born out of wedlock who seeks to inherit from the putative father); Allen v. Bowen, 657 F.Supp. 148, 152 (N.D.Ill.1987) (clear and convincing proo…
cited
Cited "see"
Air-Sea Forwarders, Inc. v. Air Asia Company, Ltd., and E-Systems, Inc.
See United States v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 785 F.2d 777 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 988 , 107 S.Ct. 580 , 93 L.Ed.2d 583 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brita ARBOGAST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee
See Imani v. Heckler, 797 F.2d 508 , 511 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 988 , 107 S.Ct. 580 , 93 L.Ed.2d 583 (1986); cf. Daniel v. Secretary of Health and Human Servs., 647 F.Supp. 1209, 1211 (E.D.Mich.1986) (noting, without disapproval, that AU failed to make credibility determination concerning claimant’s subjective complaints).
cited
Cited "see"
Tirso S. Herrera v. The United States
See Wilson v. Turnage, 791 F.2d 151, 155-56 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 580 , 93 L.Ed.2d 583 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., Inc.
See United States v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 785 F.2d 777, 779 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 580 , 93 L.Ed.2d 583 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mansion House Center Redevelopment Co.
See Gould v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York, 790 F.2d 769, 773 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 580 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
44 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1180, 44 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,328, 2 indiv.empl.rts.cas. 1112 John J. Sorosky v. Burroughs Corporation
See Gould v. Mutual Life Insurance Co., 790 F.2d 769, 774 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 580 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986); Lewis v. Time Inc., 710 F.2d 549, 552 (9th Cir.1983); Sheeran v. General Electric Co., 593 F.2d 93, 97-98 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 868 , 100 S.Ct. 143 , 62 L.Ed.2d 93 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sorosky v. Burroughs Corp.
See Gould v. Mutual Life Insurance Co., 790 F.2d 769, 774 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 580 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986); Lewis v. Time Inc., 710 F.2d 549, 552 (9th Cir.1983); Sheeran v. General Electric Co., 593 F.2d 93, 97-98 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 868 , 100 S.Ct. 143 , 62 L.Ed.2d 93 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Allen v. Bowen
See Imani v. Heckler, 797 F.2d 508 , 511 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 580 , 93 L.Ed.2d 583 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hancock Industries v. Schaeffer
Once remanded, the district court will have power to grant the motion, but not before. 73 Id. at 123 (citing cases); accord, e.g., Gould v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York, 790 F.2d 769, 772 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 580 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986); Egger, 710 F.2d at 329 ; Carr, 543 F.2d at 926 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Hancock Industries v. Schaeffer
Id. at 123 (citing cases); accord, e.g., Gould v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York, 790 F.2d 769, 772 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 107 S.Ct. 580 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986); Egger, 710 F.2d at 329 ; Carr, 543 F.2d at 926 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
43 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 155, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8022, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13,764 United States of America v. Clayton Ross Bracy, United States of America v. David Wayne Hogle, United States of America v. Perry Gilmartin, United States of America v. Richard Melvin Garfinkle
See also United States v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 785 F.2d 777, 778-79 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 988 , 107 S.Ct. 580 , 93 L.Ed.2d 583 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bracy
See also United States v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 785 F.2d 777, 778-79 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 988 , 107 S.Ct. 580 , 93 L.Ed.2d 583 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Al-Site Corp. v. VSI International, Inc.
See also Wilson v. Turnage, 791 F.2d 151, 157 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 988 , 107 S.Ct. 580 , 93 L.Ed.2d 583 (1986) (Prior decisions generally act as collateral estoppel, however, “where the situation is vitally altered between the time of the first judgment and the second, the prior determination is not conclusive ... [and] a judicial declaration intervening between the two proceedings may so change the legal atmosphere as to render the rule of collateral estoppel inapplicable.”) (quoting, Commissioner v. Sunnen, 333 U.S. 591, 600 , 68 S.Ct. 715, 720 , 92 L.Ed. 898 (1948)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Executive Software North America, Inc. v. United States District Court For The Central District Of California
See, e.g., Colautti v. Franklin, 439 U.S. 379, 392 , 99 S.Ct. 675, 684 , 58 L.Ed.2d 596 (1979) ("[It is an] elementary cannon of construction that a statute should be interpreted so as not render one part inoperative."); see also Wilson v. Turnage, 750 F.2d 1086, 1091 (D.C.Cir.1984) ("When different terms are used in a single piece of legislation, the court must presume that Congress intended the terms to have different meanings."), vacated on other grounds, 755 F.2d 967 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 988 , 107 S.Ct. 580 , 93 L.Ed.2d 583 (1986); National Insulation Transp.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Executive Software North America, Inc. v. United States District Court for the Central District of California
See, e.g., Colautti v. Franklin, 439 U.S. 379, 392 , 99 S.Ct. 675, 684 , 58 L.Ed.2d 596 (1979) (“[It is an] elementary cannon of construction that a statute should be interpreted so as not render one part inoperative.”); see also Wilson v. Turnage, 750 F.2d 1086, 1091 (D.C.Cir.1984) (“When different terms are used in a single piece of legislation, the court must presume that Congress intended the terms to have different meanings.”), vacated on other grounds, 755 F.2d 967 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 988 , 107 S.Ct. 580 , 93 L.Ed.2d 583 (1986); National Insulation Transp.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Groves v. Ring Screw Works
We set out the most recent expression of our court concerning Fortune: 30 This circuit has concluded, in essence that regardless of whether the contractual dispute resolution mechanism results in a "final and binding" decision, the existence of that mechanism will foreclose judicial review provided we find that it was intended to be exclusive.... 31 While we may question the wisdom of foreclosing judicial review of contracts which fail to provide for either "final" or "binding" peaceful resolution via arbitration, since the absence of such a provision cannot be taken to infer that the union (a…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Groves v. Ring Screw Works
Mochko v. Acme-Cleveland Corp., 826 F.2d 1064 (6th Cir.1987) (unpublished per curiam); see also Agate v. General Motors Corp., 798 F.2d 1413 (6th Cir.1986) (unpublished per curiam), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 988 , 107 S.Ct. 580 , 93 L.Ed.2d 583 (1986); United Furniture Workers v. National Bedding, 718 F.2d 1101 (6th Cir.1983) (unpublished per curiam).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gould
v.
Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York
v.
Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York
No. 86-655.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 1, 1986.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.