green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
10.3 score
“the trial judge should not have admitted evidence of pirovolos's prior convictions; the defense's preferred stipulation that pi-rovolos has been convicted of a prior felony was sufficient.”
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 39 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. William R. Wilson
But see United States v. Gillies, 851 F.2d 492, 496 (1st Cir.) (indictment alleging only that defendant was previously convicted of three or more violent felonies met constitutional notice requirements), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 857 , 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 119 (1988).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Rooney
congress wished... to achieve a crime-control objective, namely, stopping convicted felons from possessing guns.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Charles King
the trial judge should not have admitted evidence of pirovolos's prior convictions; the defense's preferred stipulation that pi-rovolos has been convicted of a prior felony was sufficient.
discussed
Cited "see"
East Mississippi State Hosp. v. Callens
See Conner v. Reinhard, 847 F.2d 384, 394, n. 8 (CA7), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 856 , 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 118 (1988); Houston v. Reich, 932 F.2d 883, 885 (C.A.10 1991); Lundgren v. McDaniel, 814 F.2d 600, 603-604 (C.A.11 1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
East Mississippi State Hospital v. Jimmy B. Callens
See Conner v. Reinhard, 847 F.2d 384, 394, n. 8 (CA7), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 856 , 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 118 (1988); Houston v. Reich, 932 F.2d 883, 885 (CA10 1991); Lundgren v. McDaniel, 814 F.2d 600, 603-604 (CA11 1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Warnock v. Pecos County
See Conner v. Reinhard, 847 F.2d 384, 395 (7th Cir.) (holding that a prior suit against a municipality does not bar a subsequent suit against officials individually because official-capacity and personal-capacity suits involve different legal theories and defenses), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 856 , 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 118 (1988); Headley v. Bacon, 828 F.2d 1272, 1277-79 (8th Cir.1987) (distinguishing privity between principal and agent from privity between a governmental entity and officials sued in their individual capacities).
discussed
Cited "see"
Warnock v. Pecos County, Texas
See Conner v. Reinhard, 847 F.2d 384, 395 (7th Cir.) (holding that a prior suit against a municipality does not bar a subsequent suit against officials individually because official-capacity and personal-capacity suits involve different legal theories and defenses), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 856 , 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 118 (1988); Headley v. Bacon, 828 F.2d 1272, 1277-79 (8th Cir.1987) (distinguishing privity between principal and agent from privity between a governmental entity and officials sued in their individual capacities).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jefferson v. Ambroz
See Conner v. Reinhard, 847 F.2d 384, 390-91 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 856 , 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 118 (1988); Johnson v. Multnomah County, Oregon, 48 F.3d 420, 427 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 2616 , 132 L.Ed.2d 858 (1995); Feldman, 43 F.3d at 831; O'Connor v. Steeves, 994 F.2d 905, 915-16 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1024 , 114 S.Ct. 634 , 126 L.Ed.2d 593 (1993); Powell v. Gallentine, 992 F.2d 1088, 1091 (10th Cir.1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jefferson v. Ambroz
See Conner v. Reinhard, 847 F.2d 384, 390-91 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 856 , 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 118 (1988); Johnson v. Multnomah County, Oregon, 48 F.3d 420, 427 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2616 , 132 L.Ed.2d 858 (1995); Feldman, 43 F.3d at 831; O’Connor v. Steeves, 994 F.2d 905, 915-16 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1024 , 114 S.Ct. 634 , 126 L.Ed.2d 593 (1993); Powell v. Gallentine, 992 F.2d 1088, 1091 (10th Cir.1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Freddie Hubbard
The indictment’s reference to the weapon’s prior transport in interstate commerce was, we decided, an adequate means of alleging the “in or affecting commerce” element of the offense. 860 F.2d at 1373-74 ; accord United States v. Gillies, 851 F.2d 492, 493-95, 496 (1st Cir.) (Breyer, J.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 857 , 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 119 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Na Iwi O Na Kupuna O Mokapu v. Dalton
See West Coast Truck Lines, Inc. v. Arcata Community Recycling Center, Inc., 846 F.2d 1239, 1244 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 856 , 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 119 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Barbara Propst and Franklin M. Propst v. Donald L. Bitzer, Morton W. Weir, Judith S. Liebman, and Robert M. Berdahl
See Conner v. Reinhard, 847 F.2d 384, 390-91 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 856 , 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 118 (1988); Knapp v. Whitaker, 757 F.2d 827, 841-42 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 803 , 106 S.Ct. 36 , 88 L.Ed.2d 29 (1985); see also O’Connor v. Steeves, 994 F.2d 905, 915-16 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 634 , 126 L.Ed.2d 593 (1993); O’Donnell v. Yanchulis, 875 F.2d 1059 , 1061-62 (3d Cir.1989); Conaway v. Smith, 853 F.2d 789, 797-98 (10th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph W. Henry
See Neely, 980 F.2d at 1087 (the most important factor is the strength of the evidence against the defendant). “ ‘[S]trong evidence of guilt eliminates any lingering doubt that the prosecutor’s remark unfairly prejudiced the jury’s deliberation.’” Van Whye, 965 F.2d at 533 (quoting United States v. Pirovolos, 844 F.2d 415, 427 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 857 , 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 119 (1988)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kevin Gilliam
(2×)
See United States v. Pirovolos, 844 F.2d 415, 420 (7th Cir.) (en banc) (holding that the trial judge erred in admitting evidence of prior convictions where the defendant proposed a stipulation to the one sufficient prior conviction), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 857 , 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 119 (1988); cf. United States v. Mohel, 604 F.2d 748, 754 (2d Cir.1979) (holding that once a stipulation is made to an element of an offense, other crime evidence that might be introduced to prove that element under Fed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert O’CONNOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Walter H. Clark, Robert E. Paaswell, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
See Conner v. Reinhard, 847 F.2d 384, 398 (7th Cir.1988) (Cudahy, J. concurring) (“where the legality of the actions of a section 1983 defendant depends upon the defendant’s motive or intent, the qualified immunity inquiry cannot be confined to a purely objective view of defendant’s actions.”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 856 , 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 118 (1988); see also Feliciano-Angulo v. Rivera-Cruz, 858 F.2d 40, 47 (1st Cir.1988) (“As there was a disputed factual issue regarding why defendant dismissed plaintiff, the district court was in no position to grant summary judgment in …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alvarez
See United States v. Gillies, 851 F.2d 492, 496 (1st Cir.1988) (reference to “three prior felonies” in indictment provides sufficient notice to defendant that, if found guilty, his sentence will be enhanced under § 924(e)), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 857 , 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 119 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony Alexander Alvarez
See United States v. Gillies, 851 F.2d 492, 496 (1st Cir.1988) (reference to “three prior felonies” in indictment provides sufficient notice to defendant that, if found guilty, his sentence will be enhanced under § 924(e)), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 857 , 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 119 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Jon Robert Perroton, Debtor. Jon Robert Perroton v. Nancy L.G. Gray
As a general rule, “[w]here Congress includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it in another section of the same Act,, it is generally presumed that Congress acts intentionally and purposely in the disparate inclusion or exclusion.” Russello v. United States, 464 U.S. 16, 23 , 104 S.Ct. 296, 302 , 78 L.Ed.2d 17 (1983); see West Coast Truck Lines v. Areata Comm. Recycling Center, 846 F.2d 1239, 1244 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 856 , 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 119 (1988); Arizona Elec.
discussed
Cited "see"
Stewart v. Ragland
See West Coast Truck Lines, Inc. v. Arcata Community Recycling, Center, Inc., 846 F.2d 1239, 1244 (9th Cir.1988) (applying federal law), cert. denied 488 U.S. 856 , 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 119 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stewart v. Ragland
See West Coast Truck Lines, Inc. v. Areata Community Recycling, Center, Inc., 846 F.2d 1239, 1244 (9th Cir.1988) (applying federal law), cert. denied 488 U.S. 856 , 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 119 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Larry Harmon Pictures Corporation v. The Williams Restaurant Corporation
(2×)
See the discussion in United States v. Gillies, 851 F.2d 492, 493, 494 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 857 , 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 119 (1988), of such statutory usages as "in commerce", "engaged in commerce", and "affecting commerce".
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles Koen & Associates v. City of Cairo and Allen Moss
See Conner v. Reinhard, 847 F.2d 384, 394-96 (7th Cir.) (rejecting the argument that Mandarino embodies a federal rule of claim preclusion that officials sued in their individual capacities are in privity with the government), ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 856 , 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 118 (1988). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Sheldon L. Wulf v. The City of Wichita, Gene Denton, and Richard Lamunyon
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Conner v. Reinhard, 847 F.2d 384, 397 (7th Cir.) (“The requisite causal connection is satisfied if the defendant set in motion a series of events that the defendant knew or should reasonably have known would cause others to deprive the plaintiff of her constitutional rights.”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 118 (1988); Miller v. City of Mission, Kansas, 705 F.2d 368, 375 (10th Cir.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Lester Valiant A/K/A Lester J. Valiant
See United States v. Gillies, 851 F.2d 492, 496 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 119 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Lewandowski v. Two Rivers Public School District
See Conner v. Reinhard, 847 F.2d 384 , 394 n. 8 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 118 (1988); Meadows v. State of Indiana, 854 F.2d 1068, 1069 (7th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edwin A. Towne, Jr.
See United States v. Gillies, 851 F.2d 492, 497 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 119 (1988); United States v. Harden, 846 F.2d 1229, 1232 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 264 , 102 L.Ed.2d 252 (1988); United States v. Rush, 840 F.2d 580, 581 (8th Cir.1988); United States v. Wicks, 833 F.2d 192, 194 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 87 , 102 L.Ed.2d 63 (1988); United States v. Petty, 828 F.2d 2, 3 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 2827 , 100 L.Ed.2d 928 (1988); United States v. Greene, 810 F.2d 999, 1000 (11th C…
examined
Cited "see"
Thompson v. Board of Educ. of the City of Chicago
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Conner v. Reinhard, 847 F.2d 384, 394 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 118 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bettye WARNOCK v. PECOS COUNTY, TEXAS, et al
See Conner v. Reinhard, 847 F.2d 384, 395 (7th Cir.) (holding that a prior suit against a municipality does not bar a subsequent suit against officials individually because official-capacity and personal-capacity suits involve different legal theories and defenses), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 856 , 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 118 (1988); Headley v. Bacon, 828 F.2d 1272, 1277-79 (8th Cir.1987) (distinguishing privity between principal and agent from privity between a governmental entity and officials sued in their individual capacities).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jaramillo
Power Co-op. v. United States, 816 F.2d 1366 , 1375 (9th Cir.1987); see also West Coast Truck Lines, Inc. v. Arcata Community Recycling Ctr., 846 F.2d 1239, 1244 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 856 , 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 119 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8505, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 14,675 United States of America v. Guillermo Jaramillo
Power Co-op. v. United States, 816 F.2d 1366 , 1375 (9th Cir.1987); see also West Coast Truck Lines, Inc. v. Arcata Community Recycling Ctr., 846 F.2d 1239, 1244 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 856 , 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 119 (1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hirschfeld v. Spanakos
See e.g., Conner v. Reinhard, 847 F.2d 384, 394 (7th Cir.) cert. denied, 488 U.S. 856 , 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 118 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shawn C. Pride, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Various John Does, Trooper Jan Lamb, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee
See, e.g., Conner v. Reinhard, 847 F.2d 384 , 394 n. 8 (7th Cir.) (qualified immunity indi *716 cates action was for individual capacity), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 856 , 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 118 (1988); Lundgren v. McDaniel, 814 F.2d 600, 604 (11th Cir.1987) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lem Hughes
See, e.g., United States v. Gillies, 851 F.2d 492, 497 (1st Cir.) (adopting multiple criminal episodes standard), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 857 , 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 119 (1988); United States v. Herbert, 860 F.2d 620, 622 (5th Cir.1988) (holding two burglaries on different days were distinct criminal transactions for purpose of § 924(e)), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1070 , 109 S.Ct. 2074 , 104 L.Ed.2d 639 (1989); United States v. Wicks, 833 F.2d 192, 194 (9th Cir.1987) (per curiam) (holding two burglaries perpetrated on the same night at different locations but prosecuted together were multip…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles Yeksigian v. Ralph Nappi, Howard Nicholas, and City of Chicago
See Brandon v. Holt, 469 U.S. 464, 469-71 , 105 S.Ct. 873, 876-78 , 83 L.Ed.2d 878 (1985); see also Conner v. Reinhard, 847 F.2d 384 , 394 n. 8 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 118 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Alvin Gene Washington, Cross-Appellee
See also United States v. Gillies, 851 F.2d 492, 497 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 119 (1988) (two drug store robberies occurring on consecutive days held to be multiple criminal episodes).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David D. Schoolcraft
(2×)
See also United States v. Gillies, 851 F.2d 492, 497 (1st Cir.) (" 'the statute was intended to reach multiple criminal episodes that were distinct in time, not multiple felony convictions arising out of a single criminal episode' ") (quoting United States v. Petty, 828 F.2d 2, 3 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 2827 , 100 L.Ed.2d 928 (1988)), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 119 (1988); Wicks, 833 F.2d at 194 (two burglaries which occurred on the same night, but were committed at two different places at two different times could be counted as sepa…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
O'donnell v. Yanchulis
See, e.g., Conner v. Reinhard, 847 F.2d 384, 390 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 118 (1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
O'Donnell v. Yanchulis
See, e.g., Conner v. Reinhard, 847 F.2d 384, 390 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 118 (1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hector Hernandez and Jose Barcelo
See also United States v. Pirovolos, 844 F.2d 415, 426 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 119 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Eastham
v.
Oklahoma
v.
Oklahoma
No. 88-5002.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1988.
Published
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (1) · D. Maine (1)
Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.