green
Positive treatment
5.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
International Environmental Management, Inc. v. United Corporate Services, Inc.
See Hagerman v. Yukon Energy Corp., 839 F.2d 407, 414 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 820 , 109 S.Ct. 63 , 102 L.Ed.2d 40 (1988) (standard of review).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pro Edge L.P. v. Gue
Assocs. of the Black Hills, 141 F.3d 1284 , 1286 (8th Cir.1998); see Hagerman v. Yukon Energy Corp., 839 F.2d 407, 413 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 820 , 109 S.Ct. 63 , 102 *699 L.Ed.2d 40 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Engineered Products Co. v. Donaldson Co., Inc.
As socs. of the Black Hills, 141 F.3d 1284 , 1286 (8th Cir.1998); accord Hagerman v. Yukon Energy Corp., 839 F.2d 407, 413 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 820 , 109 S.Ct. 63 , 102 L.Ed.2d 40 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Sherman v. Kasotakis
Assocs. of the Black Hills, 141 F.3d 1284 , 1286 (8th Cir.1998); see Hagerman v. Yukon Energy Corp., 839 F.2d 407, 413 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 820 , 109 S.Ct. 63 , 102 L.Ed.2d 40 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Krauth v. Executive Telecard, Ltd.
See Hagerman v. Yukon Energy Corp., 839 F.2d 407, 411 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 820 , 109 S.Ct. 63 , 102 L.Ed.2d 40 (1988) (prospectus filed with the S.E.C. was evidence that could be used to establish that the parties had agreed to modify their agreement).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nova Home Health Services, Inc. v. Casagrande (In Re Casagrande)
See Hagerman v. Yukon Energy Corp., 839 F.2d 407, 414 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 820 , 109 S.Ct. 63 , 102 L.Ed.2d 40 (1988); Briggs & Stratton Corp. v. Baldridge, 544 F.Supp. 667, 668 (E.D.Wisc.1982), aff'd, 728 F.2d 915 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 826 , 105 S.Ct. 105 , 106, 83 L.Ed.2d 50 (1984) (Rule 59 does not contemplate relief when issue presented could have been, but was not, raised previously); In re Kress Road Partnership, 134 B.R. 309, 311 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1991) (purpose of rule not to give moving party another “bite at the apple” by permitting the arguing of …
discussed
Cited "see"
William L. Stringer-El v. Crispus C. Nix Paul Hedgepeth John Henry John Emmett James Helling Roger Lawson
(2×)
See Hagerman v. Yukon Energy Corp., 839 F.2d 407, 413-14 (8th Cir.) (abuse of discretion standard governs district court's decision not to accept new facts and argument after judgment), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 820 , 109 S.Ct. 63 , 102 L.Ed.2d 40 (1988); Whitlock v. Midwest Acceptance Corp., 575 F.2d 652 , 653 n. 1 (8th Cir.1978) (movant has duty to show that new argument or facts brought forward after judgment could not have been made prior to judgment).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jane Doe \A\" v. Special School District of Saint Louis County"
See Hagerman v. Yukon Energy Corp., 839 F.2d 407, 414 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 109 S.Ct. 63 , 102 L.Ed.2d 40 (1988) (citing Roth-well Cotton Co. v. Rosenthal & Co., 827 F.2d 246, 251 , as amended, 835 F.2d 710 (7th Cir.1987)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jane Doe \A\" v. The Special School District Of St. Louis County"
See Hagerman v. Yukon Energy Corp., 839 F.2d 407, 414 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 63 , 102 L.Ed.2d 40 (1988) (citing Rothwell Cotton Co. v. Rosenthal & Co., 827 F.2d 246, 251 , as amended, 835 F.2d 710 (7th Cir.1987))
cited
Cited "see"
Pearly L. Wilson v. Richard P. Seiter E.M. Barnes, Sgt.
See Garver v. United States, 846 F.2d 1029, 1031 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 109 S.Ct. 63 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Niedermeier v. Office of Baucus
Babbitt, 178 F.R.D. 323, 327 (D.D.C.1998) (denial of Rule 59(e) motion was not an abuse of discretion when plaintiffs counsel knew all relevant facts prior to entry of judgment and failed to assert them), aff'd, 235 F.3d 588 (D.C.Cir.2001); see also Hagerman v. Yukon Energy Corp., 839 F.2d 407, 414 (8th Cir.) (denying motion to reconsider when evidence could have been submitted prior to ruling on dispositive motion), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 820 , 109 S.Ct. 63 , 102 L.Ed.2d 40 (1988); Falkenberg Capital Corp. v. Dakota Cellular, Inc., 925 F.Supp. 231, 243 (D.Del.1996) (affidavit offered by plain…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
M & Z CAB CORP. v. City of Chicago
See Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co., 467 U.S. 986, 1007-08 , 104 S.Ct. 2862, 2875 , 81 L.Ed.2d 815 (1984) (finding no taking where party was on notice of the conditions under which property interest may be affected); see also NL Industries, Inc. v. United States 12 Cl.Ct. 391, 400 (1987) (finding no taking when regulatory action affects property that is acquired while the regulatory system is in effect), aff'd, 839 F.2d 1578 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 820 , 109 S.Ct. 63 , 102 L.Ed.2d 41 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sowell v. Butcher & Singer, Inc.
See, e.g., Hagerman v. Yukon Energy, 839 F.2d 407, 412 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 820 , 109 S.Ct. 63 , 102 L.Ed.2d 40 (1988) (evidence presented showing restrictions on transferability of unregistered shares has the effect of reducing market value); Holmes v. Bateson, 583 F.2d 542, 563 (1st Cir.1978) (where stock was unregistered and not freely transferrable, expert calculated 30% reduction in market value).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sowell v. Butcher & Singer, Inc.
See, e.g., Hagerman v. Yukon Energy, 839 F.2d 407, 412 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 820 , 109 S.Ct. 63 , 102 L.Ed.2d 40 (1988) (evidence presentedshowing restrictions on transferability of unregistered shares has the effect of reducing market value); Holmes v. Bateson, 583 F.2d 542, 563 (1st Cir.1978) (where stock was unregistered and not freely transferrable, expert calculated 30% reduction in market value). 97 The impact of a forgery of some portion of IGE stock on the true value of the shares purchased by the class plaintiffs presents a more difficult issue.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NL INDUSTRIES, INC.
v.
UNITED STATES
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 87-1922.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1988.
109 S. Ct. 63
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Denied.