green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.6 score
“the critical consideration is whether "an issue of ultimate fact" has been determined in favor of a defendant. the process by which that determination is made ... is not critical”
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Murray v. District of Columbia
f a plaintiff alleges a prima facie case, the complaint may not be dismissed for failure to state a claim.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Anderson
the critical consideration is whether "an issue of ultimate fact" has been determined in favor of a defendant. the process by which that determination is made ... is not critical
cited
Cited "see"
Lipton v. MCI Worldcom, Inc.
See Whitacre v. Davey, 890 F.2d 1168 , 1168 n. 1 (D.C.Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, 497 U.S. 1038 , 110 S.Ct. 3301 , 111 L.Ed.2d 810 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ralph C. Feltrop v. Paul K. Delo
See State v. Mercer, 618 S.W.2d 1 , 10 n. 5 (Mo. banc), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 933 , 102 S.Ct. 432 , 70 L.Ed.2d 240 (1981) 7 Feltrop's reliance on Newlon v. Armontrout, 885 F.2d 1328 (8th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1038 , 110 S.Ct. 3301 , 111 L.Ed.2d 810 (1990), is misplaced because in Newlon, which the Missouri Supreme Court decided before Preston, that Court "did not provide a limiting construction of the term" depravity of mind, 885 F.2d at 1335 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Brett C. Kimberlin v. Michael J. Quinlan
(2×)
See Whitacre v. Davey, 890 F.2d 1168 (D.C.Cir.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1038 , 110 S.Ct. 3301 , 111 L.Ed.2d 810 (1990), in which no judge dissented from the denial of rehearing. 13 HARRY T.
discussed
Cited "see"
Chuck Lee Mathenia v. Paul Delo
(2×)
See Newlon v. Armontrout, 885 F.2d 1328, 1335 (8th Cir.1989), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 3301 , 111 L.Ed.2d 810 (1990). 2 37 The second statutory aggravating circumstance found was that "the murder of Louanna Bailey was committed by the defendant for the purpose of preventing Louanna Bailey from testifying in a judicial proceeding." Mo.Rev.Stat. § 565.012.2(12).
discussed
Cited "see"
Apostoledes v. State
(2×)
See Ferrell v. State, 318 Md. 235 , 567 A.2d 937 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 110 S.Ct. 3301 , 111 L.Ed.2d 810 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kamran Tavakoli-Nouri v. Central Intelligence Agency
See Whitacre v. Davey, 890 F.2d 1168 (D.C.Cir.1989), cert. denied, 110 S.Ct. 3301 (1990). 4 The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing.
cited
Cited "see"
Ricky Carter v. Bill Armontrout
See Newlon v. Armontrout, 885 F.2d 1328, 1336 (8th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 110 S.Ct. 3301 , 111 L.Ed.2d 810 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William Weaver, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Michael Bowersox, Appellant/cross-Appellee
(2×)
Shurn v. Delo, 177 F.3d 662, 665-67 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1010 , 120 S.Ct. 510 , 145 L.Ed.2d 395 (1999); see also Newlon v. Armontrout, 885 F.2d 1328 (8th Cir.1989) (affirming pre-AEDPA grant of the writ on grounds of improper prosecutorial argument), ce rt. denied, 497 U.S. 1038 , 110 S.Ct. 3301 , 111 L.Ed.2d 810 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roberts v. Bowersox
"Improper argument violates due process when the argument is so egregious that it renders the entire trial fundamentally unfair." Rodden v. Delo, 143 F.3d 441, 446 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 119 S.Ct. 452 , 142 L.Ed.2d 405 (1998); see also Ramsey v. Bowersox, 149 F.3d 749, 755 (8th Cir.1998), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 119 S.Ct. 1083 , 143 L.Ed.2d 85 (1999), citing Newlon v. Armontrout, 885 F.2d 1328, 1336 (8th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1038 , 110 S.Ct. 3301 , 111 L.Ed.2d 810 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bentley v. Scully
This presumption was discarded in Asherman v. Meachum, 932 F.2d 137, 143-44 (2d Cir.1991) (holding Harris v. Reed replaced Martinez), in light of the Supreme Court's opinion in Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255 , 109 S.Ct. 1038 , 103 L.Ed.2d 308 (1989); see also Peterson v. Scully, 896 F.2d 661, 664 (2d Cir.) (holding that "Harris changes the law in this Circuit”), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1038 , 110 S.Ct. 3301 , 111 L.Ed.2d 810 (1990)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richmond v. State
(2×)
See also Ferrell v. State, 318 Md. 235, 241-45 , 567 A.2d 937 , cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1038 , 110 S.Ct. 3301 , 111 L.Ed.2d 810 (1990); Powers v. State, 285 Md. 269, 288 , 401 A.2d 1031 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 937 , 100 S.Ct. 288 , 62 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Feltrop
(2×)
See also, Newlon v. Armontrout, 885 F.2d 1328 (8th Cir.1989) cert. denied, Delo v. Newlon, — U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 3301 , 111 L.Ed.2d 810 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Maryland
v.
Ferrell
v.
Ferrell
No. 89-1425.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 28, 1990.
Ct. App. Md. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis without an affidavit of indigency executed by respondent granted. Cer-tiorari denied.