green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Flora Alicia Ocana
(2×)
See United States v. Rodriguez, 897 F.2d 1324, 1325 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 857 , 111 S.Ct. 158 , 112 L.Ed.2d 124 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. George Dean, James Earl Cofer, Kenneth Dewayne Smith, and Kenneth Earl Flowers
See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.8 (providing that defendant may be held accountable at sentencing for reasonably foreseeable conduct of others in furtherance of the jointly undertaken criminal activity). ‘When a defendant objects to particular findings in the presentence report, the sentencing court must resolve the specifically disputed issues of fact if intends to use those facts as a basis for its sentence.” United States v. Smith, 13 F.3d 860, 867 (5th Cir.) (citing United States v. Rodriguez, 897 F.2d 1324, 1327 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 857 , 111 S.Ct. 158 , 112 L.Ed.2d 124 (1990)), cer…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gadison
U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1, Application note 3; see United States v. Rodriguez, 897 F.2d 1324, 1325-26 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 857 , 111 S.Ct. 158 , 112 L.Ed.2d 124 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William Meyers and Gilbert Spears, Jr.
See United States v. Rodriguez, 897 F.2d 1324 (5th Cir.) (sentencing court may rely upon uncorroborated hearsay testimony and even upon out-of-court statement by unidentified informant at least where there is good cause for not allowing confrontation and some additional corroboration of statement), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 158 (1990); United States v. Beaulieu, 893 F.2d 1177 (10th Cir.) (court may rely on testimony from separate trial of co-conspirators; defendant at sentencing has no absolute right to confront witnesses whose information is made available to sentencing court), cert. denied, 11…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Young Alfaro
Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(3)(D); see Sentencing Guidelines § 6A1.3(b) (“The court shall resolve disputed sentencing factors in accordance with Rule 32(a)(1), Fed.R.Crim.P....”) 6 . 897 F.2d 1324 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, —U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 158 , 112 L.Ed.2d 124 (1990). 7 . 875 F.2d 1110 (5th Cir.1989). 8 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Armando Mir
See United States v. Rodriguez, 897 F.2d 1324, 1325 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 158 , *944 112 L.Ed.2d 124 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FLORA ALICIA OCANA
See United States v. Rodriguez, 897 F.2d 1324, 1325 (5th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 857 , 111 S.Ct. 158 , 112 L.Ed.2d 124 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Valencia
See also, United States v. Rodriguez, 897 F.2d 1324, 1326 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 857 , 111 S.Ct. 158 , 112 L.Ed.2d 124 (1990) ("While any information with `sufficient indicia of reliability to support its probable accuracy' may be considered in making the sentencing fnctfindings, .. there must be `an acceptable evidential basis' for the court's factfindings at the sentencing hearing." (citations omitted)).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Benny Ray Quertermous
See, e.g., United States v. Rodriguez, 897 F.2d 1324, 1327-28 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 158 , 112 L.Ed.2d 124 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rene Toirac
See, e.g., United States v. Rodriguez, 897 F.2d 1324, 127-28 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 158 , 112 L.Ed.2d 124 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mitan
v.
Mitan
v.
Mitan
No. 90-5019.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1990.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.