green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Perron
See United States v. Albert, 30 M.J. 331, 333 (CMA 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1028 , 111 S.Ct. 681 , 112 L.Ed.2d 672 (1991) (“Even making allowance for [the appellant’s] desire to assure that his family would receive support during any period of confinement, we are convinced beyond any reasonable doubt that, if he had been fully apprised of his pay status as it existed at the time and had been offered a pretrial agreement which limited confinement but included no reference to forfeitures, he would have accepted it and entered the same pleas of guilty.” (emphasis added)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Williams
See United States v. Albert, 30 MJ 331 (CMA 1990), cert, denied, 498 U.S. 1028 , 111 S.Ct. 681 , 112 L.Ed.2d 672 (1991); 39 Comp.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenny
(2×)
See United States v. Cervone, 907 F.2d 332, 341-42 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1028 , 111 S.Ct. 680 , 112 L.Ed.2d 672 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pasquale Amato
(2×)
Given the balance struck by Rule 8, which “authorizes some prejudice” against the defendant, a defendant who seeks separate trials under Rule 14 carries a heavy burden of showing that joinder will result in “substantial prejudice.” Turoff, 853 F.2d at 1043 ; see United States v. Cervone, 907 F.2d 332, 341 (2d Cir.1990) (defendant must show he was so severely prejudiced by spillover evidence that joint trial constituted a miscarriage of justice), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1028 , 111 S.Ct. 680 , 112 L.Ed.2d 672 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. District Council
(2×)
See United States v. Cervone, 907 F.2d 332, 344 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 680 , 112 L.Ed.2d 672 (1991); United States v. Friedman, 854 F.2d 535, 562 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 1637 , 104 L.Ed.2d 153 (1989); Riddell v. Riddell Washington Corp., 866 F.2d 1480, 1493 (D.C.Cir.1989); see also Hecht, 897 F.2d at 25 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bill Fred Hamilton
(2×)
See also United States v. Cervone, 907 F.2d 332 , 346 (2nd Cir. 1990) (emphasizing the inade *1003 quacy of the defendant’s excuse), cert. denied, 498 -U.S. 1028, 111 S.Ct. 680 , 112 L.Ed.2d 672 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Palacios
(2×)
See also United States v. Cervone, 907 F.2d 332, 341 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1028 , 111 S.Ct. 680 , 112 L.Ed.2d 672 (1991); United States v. Carrozza, 728 F.Supp. 266, 269 (S.D.N.Y.1990), aff'd, 956 F.2d 1160 (2d Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rivera
(2×)
“An appellant challenging the sufficiency of the evidence bears ‘ “ ‘a very heavy burden.’ ” ’ ” Torres, 901 F.2d at 216 (quoting United States v. Nusraty, 867 F.2d 759, 762 (2d Cir.1989) (quoting Young, 745 F.2d at 762 (quoting Carson, 702 F.2d at 361 ))); see also United States v. Cervone, 907 F.2d 332, 343 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 680 , 112 L.Ed.2d 672 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rivera
(2×)
Sufficiency of the Evidence and Asserted Government Change of Theory as to Delgado. 79 Delgado contends that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction for conspiracy to distribute heroin and that the government impermissibly changed its theory as to his criminal behavior during trial from regarding Delgado as a manager of a street spot to portraying him as merely a worker in the conspiracy. 80 "An appellant challenging the sufficiency of the evidence bears ' " 'a very heavy burden.' " ' " Torres, 901 F.2d at 216 (quoting United States v. Nusraty, 867 F.2d 759, 762 (2d Cir.1989) (…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Molina
(2×)
Fed.R.Crim.P. 8(b); see also United States v. Cervone, 907 F.2d 332, 341 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 680 , 112 L.Ed.2d 672 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dinome, Salvatore Mangialino, Anthony Senter, Joseph Testa, Ronald Ustica, Carlo Profeta, A/K/A Carlos A/K/A Carmello, Douglas Rega, Judith May Hellman, Wayne Hellman, and Sol Hellman
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Cervone, 907 F.2d 322 , 341-42 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, --- U.S. ---, 111 S.Ct. 680 , 112 L.Ed.2d 672 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. DiNome
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Cervone, 907 F.2d 322 , 341-42 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 680 , 112 L.Ed.2d 672 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Edward HALAS
v.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
v.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
No. 90-788.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 7, 1991.
Cited by 28 opinions | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Denied.