green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Kottman
See United States v. Cardona, 903 F.2d 60, 63 (1st Cir.1990), cert denied, 498 U.S. 1049 , 111 S.Ct. 758 , 112 L.Ed.2d 778 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Guitterez
See United States v. Davis, 905 F.2d 245, 251 (9th Cir.1990) (“Verdugo-Urquidez only held that the fourth amendment does not apply to searches and seizures of nonresident aliens in foreign countries .... ”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1047 , 111 S.Ct. 758 , 112 L.Ed.2d 773 (1991) (emphasis added).
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. Benjamin
See United States v. Cobb, 905 F.2d 784, 789 (4th Cir.1990) ("[P]unitive intent behind a defendant's use of force may be inferred when the force is not reasonably related to a legitimate nonpunitive governmental objective.") (quotations omitted), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1049 , 111 S.Ct. 758 , 112 L.Ed.2d 778 (1991). 31 The record at present contains no reason for the guards' refusal to permit Williams to wash, no evidence that Williams was not in the "immense pain" he alleges, and no justification for the extended period of time Williams was left in the restraints.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Juan Dale Reese, United States of America v. Scott Matthew Dwyer, United States of America v. Daniel Wayne Broussard, United States of America v. Larry Marcel Houston
See Caballero v. Concord, 956 F.2d 204, 206 (9th Cir.1992) ("due process cases have little relevance to a 1983 action involving fourth amendment rights") (citation and internal punctuation omitted). 65 For example, appellees cite United States v. Cobb, 905 F.2d 784, 788 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1049 , 111 S.Ct. 758 , 112 L.Ed.2d 778 (1991), in support of their request for an instruction phrased in terms of "whether force was applied ... maliciously and sadistically for the very purpose of causing harm." Id. at 788.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James S. Hill, Jr., James Hill
See United States v. Cardona, 903 F.2d 60, 63 (1st Cir.1990), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 758 , 112 L.Ed.2d 778 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Austin v. Hamilton
See United States v. Cobb, 905 F.2d 784 , 788 n. 7 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 758 , 112 L.Ed.2d 778 (1991); see also Wisniewski v. Kennard, 901 F.2d 1276, 1277 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 309 , 112 L.Ed.2d 262 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Austin v. Hamilton
See United States v. Cobb, 905 F.2d 784 , 788 n. 7 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 758 , 112 L.Ed.2d 778 (1991); see also Wisniewski v. Kennard, 901 F.2d 1276, 1277 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 309 , 112 L.Ed.2d 262 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Pascual
A parolee is a convicted criminal who has been sentenced to a term' of imprisonment and who has been allowed to serve a portion of that term outside prison walls.” United States v. Polito, 583 F.2d 48, 54 (2d Cir.1978); see also United States v. Cardona, 903 F.2d 60, 63 (1st Cir.1990) (“Parole is meted out in addition to, not in lieu of, incarceration.”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1049 , 111 S.Ct. 758 , 112 L.Ed.2d 778 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ajaj v. United States
See Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1, 7 , 112 S.Ct. 995 , 117 L.Ed.2d 156 (1992) [the core judicial inquiry is whether force was applied in a good faith effort to maintain or restore discipline, or maliciously and sadistically to cause harm]; see also United States v. Cobb, 905 F.2d 784 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1049 , 111 S.Ct. 758 , 112 L.Ed.2d 778 (1991); Taylor v. McDuffie, 155 F.3d 479 (4th Cir.1998); Norman v. Taylor, 25 F.3d 1259, 1263 (4th Cir.1994); Fuentes v. Wagner, 206 F.3d 335 , 342 (3d Cir.2000); Wilson v. Williams, 83 F.3d 870, 873 (7th Cir.1996) [applied to pretrial…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Taylor v. Rhode Island
See also United States v. Cardona, 903 F.2d 60, 62 (1st Cir.1990) (noting that probation serves goals of rehabilitation and *784 public safety), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1049 , 111 S.Ct. 758 , 112 L.Ed.2d 778 (1991); Tillinghast v. Howard, 109 R.I. 497 , 287 A.2d 749, 752 (1972) ("[I]t is for the purpose of giving a convicted accused the opportunity for rehabilitation that he retains his liberty and is placed on probation.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jackie Wilson v. James K. Williams
See, e.g., United States v. Cobb, 905 F.2d 784, 788-89 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1049 , 111 S.Ct. 758 , 112 L.Ed.2d 778 (1991) (Eighth Amendment standard); Valencia v. Wiggins, 981 F.2d 1440 , 1443—17 (5th Cir.) (Eighth Amendment standard, at least in prison security context), cert. denied, 509 U.S. 905 , 113 S.Ct. 2998 , 125 L.Ed.2d 691 (1993); Telfair v. Gilberg, 868 F.Supp. 1396, 1410-12 (S.D.Ga.1994) (intermediate standard devised by district court); Manual of Model Civil Jury Instructions for the District Courts of the Eighth Circuit § 4.20 (1995) (“excessive force eases…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gunn
v.
Palmieri
v.
Palmieri
No. 90-938.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 14, 1991.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.