Fussell v. Price, 112 S. Ct. 1203 (1992). · Go Syfert
Fussell v. Price, 112 S. Ct. 1203 (1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Rijos v. Banco Bilbao Vizcaya (In Re Rijos) (bap1, 2001-06-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Rijos v. Banco Bilbao Vizcaya (In Re Rijos)
1st Cir. BAP · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Fussell, 928 F.2d 712 , 715 (5th Cir.1991), ce rt. denied, 502 U.S. 1107 , 112 S.Ct. 1203 , 117 L.Ed.2d 443 (1992); In re Contractors Equip.
discussed Cited "see" In Re McMullen
Bankr. E.D. Mich. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Fussell, 928 F.2d 712 , 716 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1107 , 112 S.Ct. 1203 , 117 L.Ed.2d 443 (1992) (questioning whether “the prosecutor’s collateral desire to secure restitution ... can properly be characterized as ‘bad faith[,]’ ” and suggesting that Kelly calls for a negative response); id. at 717 (“[I]f we accept the validity of [the] criminal statute at issue here [which “punish[es] one who intentionally ‘hinder[s] enforcement of [a] security interest or lien[,]’ ” id. at 714 ], we are bound to accept a degree of coercion [to pay the debt].”);…
cited Cited "see" Desmond v. Varrasso (In Re Varrasso)
1st Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Fussell, 928 F.2d 712, 715 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1203 , 117 L.Ed.2d 443 (1992); In re Contractors Equip.
cited Cited "see" Varrasso v. Desmond
1st Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Fussell, 928 F.2d ___ _____________ 712, 715 (5th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 1203 (1992); _____ ______ In re Contractors Equip.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William Michael FUSSELL
v.
Karen PRICE
No. 91-6727.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 24, 1992.
112 S. Ct. 1203
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Denied.