green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
La Barbera v. Federal Metal & Glass Corp.
Injunctive relief is appropriate under Section 1132(g)(2)(E) of ERISA, which states that in a successful action to enforce the requirements of ERISA, an ERISA plan may recover “such other legal or equitable relief as the court deems appropriate.” 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (g)(2)(E); see Beck v. Levering, 947 F.2d 639 , 641 (2d Cir.1991) (per curiam), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 909 , 112 S.Ct. 1937 , 118 L.Ed.2d 544 (1992); Lanzafame v. L & M Larjo Co., Inc., No. 03 CV 3640, 2006 WL 2795348 , at *9 (E.D.N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see"
Agway, Inc. Employees' 401(K) Thrift Investment Plan v. Magnuson
See Beck v. Levering, 947 F.2d 639, 642 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied sub nom., Levy v. Martin, 504 U.S. 909 , 112 S.Ct. 1937 , 118 L.Ed.2d 544 (1992); see also Herman v. South Carolina National Bank, 140 F.3d 1413, 1424 (11th Cir.1998) (noting that “[e]very Circuit addressing the issue has held that the Secretary is not bound by prior private litigation when the Secretary files an independent action to address ERISA violations.”).
cited
Cited "see"
Sudwischer v. Estate of Hoffpauir
See Sudwischer v. Estate of Paul Hoffpauir, 589 So.2d 474 (La.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 909 , 112 S.Ct. 1937 , 118 L.Ed.2d 543 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Smith
See United States v. Elmore, 33 MJ 387, 392-94 (CMA 1991), cert, denied, 504 U.S. 909 , 112 S.Ct. 1938 , 118 L.Ed.2d 544 (1992) and cases cited therein.
examined
Cited "see"
Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation v. Empresa Naviera Santa S.A.
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Beck v. Levering, 947 F.2d 639, 642 (2d Cir.1991) (per curiam), cert. denied sub nom., Levy v. Martin, 504 U.S. 909 , 112 S.Ct. 1937 , 118 L.Ed.2d 544 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Chao v. Merino
See, e.g., Beck v. Levering, 947 F.2d 639, 641 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 909 , 112 S.Ct. 1937 , 118 L.Ed.2d 544 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Chao v. Merino
See, e.g., Beck v. Levering, 947 F.2d 639, 641 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 909 , 112 S.Ct. 1937 , 118 L.Ed.2d 544 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
I.B.E.W Local No. 910 Welfare, Annuity, & Pension Funds Ex Rel. Love v. Dexelectrics, Inc.
See, e.g., Beck v. Levering, 947 F.2d 639, 641 (2d Cir.1991) (stating that permanent injunctions are available as a remedy under ERISA), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 909 , 112 S.Ct. 1937 , 118 L.Ed.2d 544 (1992); Mason Tenders Dist.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Herman v. South Carolina Nat'l Bank
See, e.g., Beck v. Levering, 947 F.2d 639, 642 (2d Cir. 1991), cert. denied sub nom., Levy v. Martin, 504 U.S. 909 (1992); Secretary of Labor v. Fitzsimmons, 805 F.2d 682, 690-94 (7th Cir. 1986); Donovan v. Cunningham, 716 F.2d 1455, 1462-63 (5th Cir. 1983); see also Brock v. Gillikin, 677 F. Supp. 398, 402 (E.D.N.C. 1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Herman v. South Carolina National Bank
See, e.g., Beck v. Levering, 947 F.2d 639, 642 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied sub nom., Levy v. Martin, 504 U.S. 909 , 112 S.Ct. 1937 , 118 L.Ed.2d 544 (1992); Secretary of Labor v. Fitzsimmons, 805 F.2d 682, 690-94 (7th Cir.1986); Donovan v. Cunningham, 716 F.2d 1455, 1462-63 (5th Cir.1983); see also Brock v. Gillikin, 677 F.Supp. 398, 402 (E.D.N.C.1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Oci Mortgage Corporation v. Marchese, No. Cv 94 031 27 76s (Feb. 4, 1998)
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Midwest Federal Savings Bank, 36 F.3d 783 , 797 (9th Cir. 1993); see also FDIC v. Wright, 942 F.2d 1089 , 1100 (7th Cir. 1991), cert. denied 504 U.S. 909 , 112 S.Ct. 1937 , CT Page 1355 118 L.Ed.2d 544 (1992) reh. denied 505 U.S. 1231 , 112 S.Ct. 3058 , 120 L.Ed.2d (1992); FDIC v. Ranbia Shopping Center, 791 F.2d 215 220 (1st Cir. 1986); Cardente v. Fleet Bank of Maine, Inc., 796 F. Sup. 603 , 611 (D.Me 1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Remington Investments, Inc. v. Davis
See, e.g., FDIC v. Wright, 942 F. 2d 1089 (7th Cir.1991) (holding that D’Oench doctrine applied where the only fault on part of borrower was her failure to reduce agreement to writing), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 909 , 112 S.Ct. 1937 , 118 L.Ed.2d 544 (1992); Black v. FDIC, 640 F.2d 699 (5th Cir.) (unwritten understanding to make construction loans on certain real estate and disregard prior tardiness of the obligors), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 838 , 102 S.Ct. 143 , 70 L.Ed.2d 119 (1981); FDIC v. Lattimore Land Corp., 656 F.2d 139 (5th Cir.1981) (oral agreements to make future loans); FDIC v. Hoover…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Westchester Management Corp., dba Salem Park Nursing Home
v.
Department of Health and Human Services
v.
Department of Health and Human Services
No. 91-1197.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 18, 1992.
504 U.S. 909
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.