green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
5.8 score
“remarks were provoked to some extent by one defense counsel's despicable verbal assault on the court”
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Thomas Mickens, Bettina Jacobs Celifie
mickens i
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Daidone
remarks were provoked to some extent by one defense counsel's despicable verbal assault on the court
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bell
See United States v. Sloan, 939 F.2d 499, 501 (7th Cir.1991) (rejecting assertions that an individual was "not a taxpayer” and "not a person" subject to the tax laws as "simply wrong”), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1060 , 112 S.Ct. 940 , 117 L.Ed.2d 110 (1992); Lonsdale v. United States, 919 F.2d 1440, 1448 (10th Cir.1990) (rejecting argument that citizen of a state is "not a person” under the Internal Revenue Code as "completely lacking in legal merit and patently frivolous”); United States v. Dawes, 874 F.2d 746, 751 (10th Cir.1989) (rejecting individual’s assertion of being a "sovereign…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hakeem Olayinka Alli-Balogun, Also Known as Ralph Badmus
See United States v. Mickens, 926 F.2d 1323, 1328-29 (2d Cir.1991), ce rt. denied, 502 U.S. 1060 , 112 S.Ct. 940 , 117 L.Ed.2d 111 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Harvey Myerson, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
See United States v. Mickens, 926 F.2d 1323, 1329 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 940 , 117 L.Ed.2d 111 (1992); see also Huddleston v. United States, 485 U.S. 681 , 108 S.Ct. 1496 , 99 L.Ed.2d 771 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Jones v. Arbor, Inc.
See Hayes v. Community General Osteopathic Hosp., 940 F.2d 54, 56 (3d Cir. 1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 940 , 117 L.Ed.2d 110 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Andre Rogers
See United States v. Mickens, 926 F.2d 1323, 1332 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 940 , 117 L.Ed.2d 111 (1992); United States v. Joyner, 924 F.2d 454, 459 (2d Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ebron v. United States
See, e.g., United States v. Mickens, 926 F.2d 1323, 1328-29 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1060 , 112 S.Ct. 940 , 117 L.Ed.2d 111 (1992) (evidence that defendant made a hand gesture in the shape of a gun in order to intimidate a key prosecution witness was probative of defendant’s consciousness of guilt).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Fasciana
“Where a defendant claims that his conduct has an innocent explanation, prior act evidence is generally admissible to prove that the defendant acted with the state of mind necessary to commit the offense charged.” United States v. Zackson, 12 F.3d 1178, 1182 (2d Cir.1993) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1224 , 114 S.Ct. 2717 , 129 L.Ed.2d 842 (1994); see also United States v. Mickens, 926 F.2d 1323, 1329 (2d Cir.1991) (affirming admission of evidence of prior narcotics activity because it was “relevant to the second element of the money laundering charge, i.e., that [the defen…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Pascarella, Mark D'andrea, John Breheney
“Where a defendant claims that his conduct has an innocent explanation, prior act evidence is generally admissible to prove that the defendant acted with the state of mind necessary to commit the offense charged.” United States v. Zackson, 12 F.3d 1178, 1182 (2d Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2717 , 129 L.Ed.2d 842 (1994); see also United States v. Mickens, 926 F.2d 1323, 1329 (2d Cir.1991) (affirming admission of evidence of prior narcotics activity because it was “relevant to the second element of the money laundering charge, i.e., that [the defendant] knew that the lau…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. United States
See, e.g., United States v. Sloan, 939 F.2d 499, 500-01 (7th Cir.1991) (rejecting contention that defendant was exempt from federal taxation as a citizen of a state but not the United States), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1060 , 112 S.Ct. 940 , 117 L.Ed.2d 110 (1992); United States v. Price, 798 F.2d 111, 113 (5th Cir.1986) (rejecting “special status” as state citizen argument); United States v. Studley, 783 F.2d 934, 937 (9th Cir.1986) (rejecting argument that defendant was “an absolute, freeborn and natural individual” and therefore not a “taxpayer”); cf. In re Becraft, 885 F.2d 547 , …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tropiano
See, e.g., United States v. Mickens, 926 F.2d 1328, 1331-32 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1060 , 112 S.Ct. 940 , 117 L.Ed.2d 111 (1992) (approving drug quantity estimate based on amount of money that changed hands); United States v. Jacobs, 955 F.2d 7, 9 (2d Cir.1992) (same); United States v. Prescott, 920 F.2d 139, 142 (2d Cir.1990) (relying largely on number of phone calls made and received in estimating quantity of drugs).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Allen Lee Blossom v. Csx Transportation, Inc.
(2×)
See Somer v. Johnson, 704 F.2d 1473, 1478 (11th Cir.1983) ("the possibility that the jury may have employed the wrong criterion of liability to exonerate the defendants requires a new trial”); Johnson v. Bryant, 671 F.2d 1276, 1281 (11th Cir.1982) (the instructions suggested "[t]wo contradictory standards of liability ..., and we cannot say that the jury followed the proper rule”); see also Smalley v. Duluth, Winnipeg & Pacific Railway Co., 940 F.2d 296, 299 (8th Cir.1991) ("When there exists, ... internal contradiction or inconsistency, courts should not presume they jury understood the p…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rupert Gordon
(2×)
Under Rule 404(b) “evidence of other narcotics crimes has been held admissible to show the defendant’s intent to be involved in the narcotics transaction at issue ... or to show his knowledge of the narcotics-related character of his acts.” United States v. Afjehei, 869 F.2d 670, 674 (2d Cir.1989) (citation omitted); see also United States v. Mickens, 926 F.2d 1323, 1329 (2d Cir.1991) (“Mickens’ prior involvement in narcotics activity was relevant to the prosecution’s tax evasion and money laundering theory that narcotics sales provided the cash which Mickens spent so lavishly.”)…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aiken v. Bucks Ass'n for Retarded Citizens, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Hayes v. Community General Osteopathic Hosp., 940 F.2d 54, 56 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 940 , 117 L.Ed.2d 110 (1992). *527 Section 101(2)(b) of the Act, codified at 42 U.S.C.A. § 1981 (b) .(West Supp.1992), legislatively overrules Patterson by amending Section 1981 to state as follows: For purposes of this section, the term ‘make and enforce contracts’ includes the making, performance, modification, and termination of contracts, and the enjoyment of all benefits, privileges, terms, and conditions of the contractual relationship.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gregory Vincent Mitchell
See, e.g., United States v. Mickens, 926 F.2d 1323, 1332 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 940 , 117 L.Ed.2d 111 (1992); United States v. Edwards, 945 F,2d 1387, 1394 (7th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. *459 1590, 118 L.Ed.2d 308 (1992); United States v. North, 900 F.2d 131, 134 (8th Cir.1990); cf. United States v. Miranda-Ortiz, 926 F.2d 172, 178 (2d Cir.) (late-entering coconspirators may be sentenced only on basis of amounts they reasonably could have foreseen conspiracy distributed before they entered), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 347 , 116 L.Ed.2d…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Duluth, Winnipeg & Pacific Railway Co.
v.
Smalley
v.
Smalley
No. 91-893.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 21, 1992.
Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (1) · E.D. New York (1)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.