green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
10.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1993 ·
…a decision not to depart is reviewable on appeal if it is the product of a conclusion that the judge lacks authority to depart
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. McClellan Chatman
(2×)
a decision not to depart is reviewable on appeal if it is the product of a conclusion that the judge lacks authority to depart
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Ronald Leland Kelley, United States of America v. Rodney Ray Jiruska
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
it may be that by writing a policy statement rather than a guideline the commission has signalled that it does not think its treatment definitive.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Patricia Wallesverd
United States v. Poff, 926 F.2d 588 , 590 13 (7th Cir.) cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 96 14 (1991); United States v. Franco, 909 F.2d 1042 , 1045 15 (7th Cir.1990). 16 We may review a refusal to depart from the sentencing 17 guidelines only if it was "imposed in violation of law." 18 U.S.C. § 3742 18 (e); United States v. Shetterly, 971 F.2d 67 , 76 19 (7th Cir.1992); Franco, 909 F.2d at 1045 20 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Checoura
See United States v. Poff, 926 F.2d 588, 595-96 (7th Cir.) (Easterbrook, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 827 , 112 S.Ct. 96 , 116 L.Ed.2d 67 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Shane Clements
See United States v. Poff, 926 F.2d 588, 592 (7th Cir.) (en banc) (“Every court that has considered the interplay between § 4B1.2 and § 5K2.13 has held that the terms are mutually exclusive, most finding the proposition so obvious that little or no discussion was required.”), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 827 , 112 S.Ct. 96 , 116 L.Ed.2d 67 (1991); see also United States v. Mayotte, 76 F.3d 887, 889 (8th Cir.1996); United States v. Dailey, 24 F.3d 1323, 1325-26 (11th Cir.1994); United States v. Russell, 917 F.2d 512, 517 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 953 , 111 S.Ct. 1427 , 113 L.Ed.2d…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Woodworth
See United States v. Poff, 926 F.2d 588 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert, denied, 502 U.S. 827 , 112 S.Ct. 96 , 116 L.Ed.2d 67 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bernard Wilson, Luis Luna, and Manuel Garcia
See United States v. Poff, 926 F.2d 588, 590-91 (7th Cir.) (en banc) (holding that a decision not to depart from the Guidelines is reviewable on appeal when it is the result of an erroneous legal conclusion about the court’s authority to depart), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 827 , 112 S.Ct. 96 , 116 L.Ed.2d 67 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Santos
See United States v. Poff, 926 F.2d 588, 590 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 827 , 112 S.Ct. 96 , 116 L.Ed.2d 67 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas J. Maloney
(2×)
"This section of RICO is capable of providing for the linkage in one proceeding of a number of otherwise distinct crimes and/or conspiracies through the concept of enterprise conspiracy." United States v. Neapolitan, 791 F.2d 489, 501 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 940 , 107 S.Ct. 422 , 93 L.Ed.2d 372 (1986); see United States v. Gonzalez, 921 F.2d 1530, 1540 (11th Cir.) ("The notion of 'enterprise conspiracy' ... has made much of the old distinction between 'single conspiracy' and 'multiple conspiracy' irrelevant to RICO conspiracy charges."), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 827 , 112 S.Ct. 96 , 1…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jesus S. Covarrubias and Graciela Covarrubias
See United States v. Poff, 926 F.2d 588, 591 , (7th Cir.1991) (en banc), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 827 , 112 S.Ct. 96 , 116 L.Ed.2d 67 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marius Canoy
See United States v. Poff, 926 F.2d 588, 590-91 (7th Cir.1991) (en banc) (refusal to depart downward reviewable on appeal if district judge believed it lacked legal authority to depart), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 96 , 116 L.Ed.2d 67 (1991); see also United States v. Atkinson, 15 F.3d 715 , 718 n. 2 (7th Cir.1994); United States v. Upthegrove, 974 F.2d 55, 56 (7th Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David P. Johnson and Ainsley Richards
See United States v. Poff, 926 F.2d 588, 590 (7th Cir.) (appellate courts “have no jurisdiction to review a refusal to depart from the Guidelines ... when the refusal reflects an exercise of the judge’s discretion”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 96 , 116 L.Ed.2d 67 (1991); United States v. Dean, 908 F.2d 215, 218 (7th Cir.1990) (“where the defendant fails to suggest any law that the district court violated in departing downward, his appeal will be denied”); United States v. Gant, 902 F.2d 570, 573 (7th Cir.1990) (“section 3742(a) does not provide for appellate review of a down…
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. McCann
See Donald v. Rast, 927 F.2d 379, 381 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 96 (1991) (standard of review).
cited
Cited "see"
Ben Sterkel v. Fruehauf Corporation Ace Hardware Corporation
See Donald v. Rast, 927 F.2d 379, 382 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 96 , 116 *533 L.Ed.2d 68 (1991); Underwood v. Colonial Penn Ins.
cited
Cited "see"
Robinson v. Reed
See Donald v. Rast, 927 F.2d 379, 381 (8th Cir.) (noting confidential nature of police officer's personnel file), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 96 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gang v. United States
See United States v. Poff, 926 F.2d 588, 591 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 96 , 116 L.Ed.2d 67 (1991) (a choice of different words reflects an intent to say something different); Zabielski v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 919 F.2d 1276, 1279 (7th Cir.1990); see also United States v. Price, 361 U.S. 304, 313 , 80 S.Ct. 326, 332 , 4 L.Ed.2d 334 (1960) (views of a subsequent Congress form a hazardous basis for inferring the intent of an earlier one).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Louis A. Kosma
See United States v. Poff, 926 F.2d 588, 591 (7th Cir.) (en banc) (threat against President is “crime of violence” under Sentencing Guidelines), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 96 , 116 L.Ed.2d 67 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert L. Hamilton
See United States v. Poff, 926 F.2d 588, 590-91 (7th Cir.1991) (en banc) (appellate court may review district court’s conclusion that because the defendant committed a crime of violence, it was not authorized to depart downward pursuant to § 5K2.13), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 96 , 116 L.Ed.2d 67 (1991); United States v. Rosen, 896 F.2d 789, 791 (3rd Cir.1990) (applying de novo standard of review to district court’s conclusion that § 5K2.13 did not authorize a downward departure where the defendant was a compulsive gambler who committed a crime of violence).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sam
Compare United States v. Poff, 926 F.2d 588 (7th Cir.1991) (en banc) (§ 5K2.13 categorically prohibits a departure for a crime of violence), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 827 , 112 S.Ct. 96 , 116 L.Ed.2d 67 (1991), with United States v. Chatman, 986 F.2d 1446 (D.C.Cir.1993) (§ 5K2.13 requires courts to look at all facts and circumstances surrounding a defendant’s crime to determine whether it was nonviolent, permitting a departure).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael W. Edwards, Terry C. Johnson, Janice S. Martinez, Jimmie J. Mohr, Noe Navejar, and Esmeralda Navejar
See, e.g., United States v. Poff, 926 F.2d 588, 590-91 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 96 (1991) (court of appeals has jurisdiction to review denial of downward departure where "decision not to depart is the product of a conclusion that the judge lacks the authority to depart").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ricou Deshaw
See e.g., United States v. Gonzalez, 921 F.2d 1530 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 178 , 116 L.Ed.2d 140 , --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 96 , 116 L.Ed.2d 68 (1991); United States v. Esposito, 912 F.2d 60 (3d Cir.1990), cert. dismissed, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 806 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1032 (1991); United States v. Ryland, 806 F.2d 941 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1057 , 107 S.Ct. 2199 , 95 L.Ed.2d 854 (1987) 21 471 U.S. 773 , 105 S.Ct. 2407 , 85 L.Ed.2d 764 (1985) (it is not a violation of the double jeopardy clause to prosecute a CCE offense after a prior conviction for one …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
U.S. v. Deshaw
See e.g., United States v. Gonzalez, 921 F.2d 1530 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 178 , 116 L.Ed.2d 140 , — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 96 , 116 L.Ed.2d 68 (1991); United States v. Esposito, 912 F.2d 60 (3d Cir.1990), ce rt. dismissed, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 806 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1032 (1991); United States v. Ryland, 806 F.2d 941 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1057 , 107 S.Ct. 2199 , 95 L.Ed.2d 854 (1987). 21 . 471 U.S. 773 , 105 S.Ct. 2407 , 85 L.Ed.2d 764 (1985) (it is not a violation of the double jeopardy clause to prosecute a CCE offense after a prior conviction for one of th…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bloome
See, e.g., United States v. Gonzalez, 921 F.2d 1530, 1538 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. — and —, 112 S.Ct. 96 and 178, 116 L.Ed.2d 68 and 140 (1991) (distinguishing conduct involved in importation and distribution of contraband from conduct involved in RICO conspiracy for purposes of Grady v. Corbin).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kane
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 90-7832.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1991.
Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (2) · Eighth Circuit (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.