green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rostoff
See United States v. Soderling, 970 F.2d 529 , 535 n. 12 (9th Cir.1992), ce rt. denied, 508 U.S. 952 , 113 S.Ct. 2446 , 124 L.Ed.2d 663 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. R.G. Reynolds
See United States v. Soderling, 970 F.2d 529, 532 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 2446 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jon R. Guthrie, A/K/A Jay Roland
See United States v. Soderling, 970 F.2d 529, 534 (9th Cir.1992) (per curiam), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 2446 , 124 L.Ed.2d 663 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Charles DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant
See United States v. Soderling, 970 F.2d 529 , 534 n. 11 (9th Cir.1992) (“[T]he restitution order entered by the district court is not unlawful because it used a formula ... to set the amount of restitution.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2446 , 124 L.Ed.2d 663 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald C. Lovell
See United States v. Campbell, 980 F.2d 245, 250-51 (4th Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2446 , 124 L.Ed.2d 663 (1993); United States v. Morales, 854 F.2d 65, 69 (5th Cir.1988); United States v. Lippner, 676 F.2d 456, 467 (11th Cir.1982); Williams v. United States, 651 F.2d 648, 650-51 (9th Cir.1981); United States v. Allen, 566 F.2d 1193, 1195 (3d Cir.1977), ce rt. denied, 435 U.S. 926 , 98 S.Ct. 1491 , 55 L.Ed.2d 519 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Claude v. Cooley, United States of America v. Lois F. Pearce
See United States v. Campbell, 980 F.2d 245, 252 (4th Cir. 1992) (affirming enhanced sentence despite court's failure to conduct a § 851(b) colloquy on grounds that "the substantive protections underlying [§ 851(b) ] were provided ..."), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 2446 (1993); see also United States v. Garcia, 954 F.2d 273 (5th Cir. 1992) (strict compliance withs 851(b) not always required).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Willie James Blake, Jr.
And, “such agreements may authorize restitution in an amount greater than the loss attributable to the offense of conviction.” Broughton-Jones, 71 F.3d at 1147 ; see also United States v. Soderling, 970 F.2d 529, 534 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 952 , 113 S.Ct. 2446 , 124 L.Ed.2d 663 (1993); United States v. Rice, 954 F.2d 40, 44 (2d Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Schrimsher
Compare United States v. Young, 953 F.2d 1288, 1290 (11th Cir.1992) (“Parties to a plea agreement cannot increase the statutory *610 powers of the sentencing judge to authorize restitution simply by stipulating to restitution beyond that allowed under the relevant version of the Act.”) with United States v. Soderling, 970 F.2d 529, 533 (9th Cir.1992) (per curiam) (“[I]f the [Federal Probation Act] allows restitution beyond the offense of conviction when the defendant agrees to such in a plea agreement, so too does the VWPA”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2446 , 124 L.Ed.2d 663 (…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Damon Durant, United States of America v. Patrick Troy Wynn, United States of America v. Nakomis Cherice Haliburton
See e.g., United States v. Campbell, 980 F.2d 245, 249 (4th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 2446 (1993); United States v. Clark, 928 F.2d 639, 641-42 (4th Cir.1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Soderling
v.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
v.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
No. 92-7551.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 1, 1993.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.