green
Positive treatment
7.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bobby Lee McKinley
See United States v. Carpenter, 963 F.2d 736, 739-40 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 927 , 113 S.Ct. 355 , 121 L.Ed.2d 269 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. McINTOSH
See United States v. Grimes, 967 F.2d 1468, 1472 (10th Cir.), cert, denied, 506 U.S. 927 , 113 S.Ct. 355 , 121 L.Ed.2d 269 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Connie Sue Heater, United States of America v. Harvey Bernard John, United States of America v. Timothy W. McCoy
See United States v. Webster, 960 F.2d 1301 (5th Cir.) (holding that “a differential between [a drug dealer’s] legitimate income and cash flow is sufficient for a money-laundering conviction”), cert. de nied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 355 , 121 L.Ed.2d 269 (1992). (4) The jury convicted McCoy on six different tax counts — two counts of tax evasion for 1990 and 1991 and four counts of having made false declarations on his income tax returns.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. White
See United States v. Grimes, 967 F.2d 1468, 1472 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 355 , 121 L.Ed.2d 269 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Remillong
In Mcllvain, both the government and defendant agreed that the record at sentencing “did not contain a basis on which to order the payment of restitution” of $160,248.00, where the defendant had “no assets, no steady employment, no source of income, a high school education, ... debt of $700[,] ... had sought Aid to Families with Dependent Children and lived with his mother”; thus, he had no "present ability to pay” and no "significant future earning capacity.” Id.; see United States v. Grimes, 967 F.2d 1468, 1473 (10th Cir.) (holding abuse of discretion to order defendants to pay r…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Raymond Torres, Joseph S. Aflleje, and Barbara Aflleje-Torres
See United States v. Grimes, 967 F.2d 1468, 1472 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 355 , 121 L.Ed.2d 269 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Daisy Mae Johnson
See United States v. Grimes, 967 F.2d 1468, 1470 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 355 , 121 L.Ed.2d 269 (1992); United States v. Hooks, 780 F.2d 1526, 1529-30, 1532 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1128 , 106 S.Ct. 1657 , 90 L.Ed.2d 199 (1986). “[R]ather than examining the evidence in bits and pieces,” we evaluate the sufficiency of the evidence by “considering] the collective inferences to be drawn from the evidence as a whole.” Hooks, 780 F.2d at 1532 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Aquiles Chavez-Palacios
See United States v. Grimes, 967 F.2d 1468, 1472 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 355 , 121 L.Ed.2d 269 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ortiz-Granados
See United States v. Webster, 960 F.2d 1301, 1310 (5th Cir.) ("Once it is established that a firearm was present during the offense, the district court should apply the enhancement [under § 2D1.1(b)(1)] unless it is clearly improbable that the weapon was connected with the offense.” (citing application note 3)), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 355 , 121 L.Ed.2d 269 (1992); United States v. Mueller, 902 F.2d 336, 345 (5th Cir.1990) (“The upward adjustment for the weapons is to be applied 'unless it is clearly improbable that the Weapon was connected with the offense.’ ” (quoting appli…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richardson
See United States v. Carpenter, 963 F.2d 736 (5th Cir.), cert. den. — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 355 , 121 L.Ed.2d 269 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Brenton Neil Mullins, United States of America v. Phillip Ross Rinker, United States of America v. James Robert Winkleman
See United States v. Reyes, 966 F.2d 508, 510 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 355 , 121 L.Ed.2d 268 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Valencia Lucena
See United States v. Webster, ___ _____________ _______ 960 F.2d 1301, 1310 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S. Ct. 355 ____ ______ (1992); United States v. McDowell, 918 F.2d 1004, 1013 (1st Cir. _____________ ________ 1990) (argument made academic by holding under 3553(c)). -16- (50) kilograms were involved.7 We have stated in related contexts that 3553(c) requires that when sentencing under the guidelines, a district court must make reasonably specific findings to allow for meaningful appellate review.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Valencia Lucena
See United States v. Webster, 960 F.2d 1301, 1310 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 355 , 121 L.Ed.2d 269 (1992); United States v. McDowell, 918 F.2d 1004, 1013 (1st Cir.1990) (argument made academic by holding under § 3553(c)). 7 .The guidelines established a base offense level of 36 for in excess of 50 kilograms at the date of sentencing, U.S.S.G. §§ 2D1.4, 2D1.1(a)(3) (Drug Quantity Table). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carlos Valencia-Lucena, United States of America v. Jose Manuel Bastian-Cortijo, A/K/A Cheo, United States of America v. Roberto Laboy-Delgado, United States of America v. Edwin Carpio-Velez
See United States v. Webster, 960 F.2d 1301, 1310 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 355 , 121 L.Ed.2d 269 (1992); United States v. McDowell, 918 F.2d 1004, 1013 (1st Cir.1990) (argument made academic by holding under § 3553(c)) 7 The guidelines established a base offense level of 36 for in excess of 50 kilograms at the date of sentencing, U.S.S.G. §§ 2D1.4, 2D1.1(a)(3) (Drug Quantity Table) 8 We do not address appellant's argument with respect to which party bears the burden on the foreseeability issue as we understand the government to believe that it met that burden.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Markum Lynn Fitzhugh
See United States v. Carpenter, 963 F.2d 736 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 355 , 121 L.Ed.2d 269 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bradford Satterwhite, III
See United States v. Webster, 960 F.2d 1301, 1307 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 355 , 121 L.Ed.2d 269 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Terry A. Douglas
See also United States v. Reyes, 966 F.2d 508 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 355 (1992). 7 The district court specifically stated in its judgment that the reason for its downward departure was to achieve parity between defendant's sentence and that of defendant Leif Merrill Field.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Judy Louise Brown Markum
See, e.g., United States v. Grimes, 967 F.2d 1468, 1472 (10th Cir.1992), cert. denied, McGlynn v. United States, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 355 , 121 L.Ed.2d 269 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bobby C. McDougald
(2×)
Compare United States v. Blackman, 904 F.2d 1250, 1257 (8th Cir.1990) (holding that the government cannot rely exclusively on proof that the accused had no legitimate source of income) with United States v. Webster, 960 F.2d 1301, 1308 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 355 , 121 L.Ed.2d 269 (1992) (holding that evidence of a differential between legitimate income and cash outflow is sufficient to support a money-laundering conviction).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mark Turner
See also, United States v. Grimes, 967 F.2d 1468, 1471 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 355 , 121 L.Ed.2d 269 (1992) (finding that endangering firefighters is appropriate factor and noting that several other circuits have come to the same conclusion).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Amy Ralston Pofahl, Charles T. Nunn, and Randy White
United States v. Satterwhite, 980 F.2d 317, 320 (5th Cir.1992); see also United States v. Webster, 960 F.2d 1301, 1307 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 355 , 121 L.Ed.2d 269 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
U.S. v. Pofahl
United States v. Satterwhite, 980 F.2d at 317, 320 (5th Cir. 1992); see also United States v. Webster, 960 F.2d 1301, 1307 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S. Ct. 355 , 121 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Frederick Allen Gruber
Moreover, we have held that "[t]he prosecutor may comment on the defendant's failure to present exculpatory evidence." United States v. Mares, 940 F.2d 455, 461 (9th Cir.1991); see also United States v. Reyes, 966 F.2d 508, 509 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 355 (1992); United States v. Castillo, 866 F.2d 1071, 1083 (9th Cir.1988) (collecting cases). 8 The prosecutor's comments here were highly pertinent.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Felmon Lakeith Laury, A/K/A Felmon Keith Ashley, A/K/A Walter Ray Nicholson
United States v. Satterwhite, 980 F.2d 317, 320 (5th Cir.1992); see also United States v. Webster, 960 F.2d 1301, 1307 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 355 , 121 L.Ed.2d 269 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
U.S. v. Laury
United States v. Satterwhite, 980 F.2d at 317, 320 (5th Cir. 1992); see also United States v. Webster, 960 F.2d 1301, 1307 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S. Ct. 355 , 121 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michel
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 92-5782.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1992.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.