green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Benito T. ESTACIO, Defendant-Appellant
See United States v. Cuozzo, 962 F.2d 945, 951 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 475 , 121 L.Ed.2d 381 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. McAnulty
See United States v. Cuozzo, 962 F.2d 945, 948 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 978 , 113 S.Ct. 475 , 121 L.Ed.2d 381 (1992); United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 907 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald Keiser, Jr.
See United States v. Cuozzo, 962 F.2d 945, 947 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 475 , 121 L.Ed.2d 381 (1992). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dennis Friday
See United States v. Cuozzo, 962 F.2d 945, 951 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 475 , 121 L.Ed.2d 381 (1992). 9 Friday has waived any claim that the sentence was improper because he has not specifically and distinctly pointed to any particular sentencing error.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rosa Olivera Rivera, United States of America v. Alfonso Rivera-Farias, United States of America v. Maria Diaz, United States of America v. Francisca Lara, United States of America v. Rosendo Cisneros
See United States v. Cuozzo, 962 F.2d 945, 950 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 475 , 121 L.Ed.2d 381 (1992). 11 D.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Noriega
See United States v. Cuozzo, 962 F.2d 945, 949 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 475 (1992). 31 Noriega contends that joinder of the counts was improper under Fed.R.Crim.P. 8, because the offenses "are not the same act or transaction, nor was there a common scheme or plan which tied count one and count two together." This conclusory argument is in error.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Efren Osorio Zapata, AKA Brian, AKA \El Tales
Therefore, in exercising its discretion, a district court should "avoid giving undue emphasis to particular testimony." Nickell, 883 F.2d at 829 ; see also United States v. Cuozzo, 962 F.2d 945, 952-53 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 978 , 113 S.Ct. 475 , 121 L.Ed.2d 381 (1992); Castillo, 866 F.2d at 1084 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dwayne Allen Edge
(2×)
See, e.g., Malbrough, 922 F.2d at 461, 465 (acquiescing in district court’s apparent determination that certain marijuana cuttings that did not have their own “root system” should not be counted as “plants”); United States v. Angeli, 794 F.Supp. 874, 875 (D.Minn.1992) (refusing to count as “plants” marijuana cuttings that “have no visible root structure ”) (emphasis added); United States v. Fitol, 733 F.Supp. 1312, 1316 (D.Minn.1990) (“It is ... clear that •these individual cuttings, planted with the intent of growing full size plants, and which had grown roots, are “pl…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Blair
v.
Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
v.
Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
No. 92-5999.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 9, 1992.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.