green
Positive treatment
7.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald Keith Blackwell
(2×)
These circuits note that in enacting the sentencing guidelines Congress sought national uniformity in the sentencing of similar defendants for similar federal offenses, and reason that departing from a defendant’s guideline range to equalize that defendant’s sentence with one imposed on a co-defendant or co-conspirator undermines the congressional objective by “creat[ing] a new and entirely unwarranted disparity between the defendant’s sentence and that of all similarly situated defendants throughout the country.” Joyner, 924 F.2d at 460-61 ; accord United States v. Fonville, 5 F.3d …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carrington
See United States v. Mala, 7 F.3d 1058, 1063 (1st Cir.1993) (holding that absent extraordinary circumstances, fact-specific claims asserting ineffective assistance of counsel are not cognizable on direct appeal), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1839 , 128 L.Ed.2d 466 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carrington
See United States v. Mala, 7 F.3d 1058, 1063 (1st Cir. ___ _____________ ____ 1993) (holding that absent extraordinary circumstances, fact- specific claims asserting ineffective assistance of counsel are not cognizable on direct appeal), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 1839 ____________ (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Davis
See United States v. Mala, 7 F.3d 1058, 1063 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 1839 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Santiago
See United States v. Mala, 7 F.3d 1058, 1063 (1st Cir. 1993) ___ _____________ ____ (collecting cases), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 1839 (1994). _____ ______ 8 conspiracy (or so the jury could have found).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Santiago
See United States v. Mala, 7 F.3d 1058, 1063 (1st Cir.1993) (collecting cases), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1839 , 128 L.Ed.2d 466 (1994). 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Olivia Martinez-Martinez
See United States v. Mala, 7 F.3d 1058, 1063 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 1839 , 128 L.Ed.2d 466 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. DiNovo
See United States v. Mala, 7 F.3d 1058, 1063 (1st Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 1839 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Labovitz
See United States v. Mala, 7 ___ _____________ ____ F.3d 1058, 1063 (1st Cir. 1993) (holding that absent extraordinary circumstances, fact specific claims asserting ineffective assistance of counsel are not cognizable on direct appeal), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 1839 (1994). _____________ Accordingly, appellant's claim of inadequate assistance is not properly before us.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Labovitz
See United States v. Mala, 7 F.3d 1058, 1063 (1st Cir. 1993) (holding that absent extraordinary circumstances, fact specific claims asserting ineffective assistance of counsel are not cognizable on direct appeal), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 1839 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Clemente v. United States
See Bemis, 30 F.3d at 222 - 23 (in the absence of unusual facts lending plausibility to belated allegations, a defendant is bound by his or her sworn representations in court disclaiming the existence of additional promise). 20 Finally, Clemente was not entitled to the appointment of counsel for this Sec. 2255 motion, see United States v. Mala, 7 F.3d 1058, 1063 (1st Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 1839 (1994), and his argument that the district judge should have recused himself from hearing the motion is specious.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Larry J. McNeil Also Known as Larry J. McNeill Appellant/cross-Appellee
See also United States v. Fonville, 5 F.3d 781 , 784 & n. 8 (4th Cir.1993) (finding a North Carolina conviction for breaking and entering a dwelling to be a crime of violence within the meaning of U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(1)(i), (ii) and § 4B1.1), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1839 , 128 L.Ed.2d 466 (1994); United States v. Raynor, 939 F.2d 191, 196-97 (4th Cir.1991) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Phaneuf
Tardiff, 969 F.2d at 1286 ("ITihe failure to ask the district court to convene an evidentiary hearing ordinarily spells defeat for a contention that one should have been held."); see also United States v. Mala, 7 F.3d 1058, 1062 (1st Cir.1993), ce rt. denied, -U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1839 , 128 L.Ed.2d 466 (1994). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Phaneuf
Tardiff, 969 F.2d at 1286 ("[T]he failure to ask the district _______ court to convene an evidentiary hearing ordinarily spells defeat for a contention that one should have been held."); see also United States v. Mala, 7 F.3d 1058, 1062 (1st Cir. ________ ______________ ____ 1993), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 1839 (1994). ____________ 9.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Larry J. McNeil
See also United States v. Fonville, 5 F.3d 781 , 784 & n.8 (4th Cir. 1993) (finding a North Carolina conviction for breaking and entering a dwelling to be a crime of violence within the meaning of USSG § 4B1.2(1)(i) (ii) and § 4B1.1), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 1839 (1994); United States v. Raynor, 939 F.2d 191 , 196- 97 (4th Cir. 1991) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Antonio Meza
See, e.g., United States v. Fonville, 5 F.3d 781, 783-84 (4th Cir.1993), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1839 , 128 L.Ed.2d 466 (1994); United States v. Garza, 1 F.3d 1098, 1100-01 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 617 , 126 L.Ed.2d 581 (1993); United States v. Womack, 985 F.2d 395, 400 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 276 , 126 L.Ed.2d 227 (1993); United States v. Ives, 984 F.2d 649, 650 (5th Cir.), *122 cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 111 , 126 L.Ed.2d 76 (1993); United States v. Williams, 980 F.2d 1463, 1467 (D.C.Cir.1992); United States v. Petti, 973 F.2d 144…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sarit-Rosario
See, e.g., United States v. Mala, 7 F.3d 1058, 1063 (1st Cir. ___ ____ ______________ ____ 1993) (collecting cases), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 1839 (1994). _____ ______ Hence, we dismiss this claim without prejudice to Sarit's right to pursue it collaterally.2 We need go no further.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sarit-Rosario
See, e.g., United States v. Mala, 7 F.3d 1058, 1063 (1st Cir.1993) (collecting cases), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 1839 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael McLymont A/K/A Black, United States of America v. Betril Mark Roberts, A/K/A Mark
See, e.g., United States v. Fonville, 5 F.3d 781, 784 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 1839 (1994); United States v. Bayerle, 898 F.2d 28, 31 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 (1990). 20 The final issue raised by Roberts concerns the district court's decision not to depart from the guidelines range despite finding that Roberts had rendered substantial assistance.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Grajeda
v.
California
v.
California
No. 93-7610.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 16, 1994.
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.