green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. McCrimmon
See State v. Hill, 174 Ariz. 313, 318 , 848 P.2d 1375, 1380 , cert. denied, 510 U.S. 898 , 114 S.Ct. 268 , 126 L.Ed.2d 219 (1993) (“A judgment of acquittal is appropriate when there is ‘no substantial evidence to warrant a conviction.’ ” (quoting Ariz. R.Crim.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Krone
(2×)
See State v. Hill, 174 Ariz. 313, 325 , 848 P.2d 1375, 1387 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct. 268 , 126 L.Ed.2d 219 (1993); see also Rule 15.7(a), Ariz.R.Crim.P.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Barr
(2×)
See State v. Hill, 174 Ariz. 313, 323 , 848 P.2d 1375, 1385 (1993), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct. 268 , 126 L.Ed.2d 219 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Maturana
See, e.g., State v. Hill, 174 Ariz. 313, 330 , 848 P.2d 1375, 1392 , cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 268 , 126 L.Ed.2d 219 (1993); State v. Wallace, 160 Ariz. 424, 427 , 773 P.2d 983, 986 (1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1047 , 110 S.Ct. 1513 , 108 L.Ed.2d 649 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hill
v.
Arizona
v.
Arizona
93-5543.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1993.
Published
Hill
v.
Arizona.
No. 93-5543.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 4, 1993.
1
Appeal from the Sup. Ct. Ariz.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 174 Ariz. 313, 848 P. 2d 1375.