green
Positive treatment
7.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Morris
But see In re Application of Gianoli Aldunate, 3 F.3d 54 (2d Cir.) (refusing to require that litigant's request be examined under foreign tribunal's discovery rules), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 443 (1993).
discussed
Cited "but see"
In Re Letter of Request From the Amtsgericht Ingolstadt, Federal Republic of Germany. United States of America v. Keith Morris
But see In re Application of Gianoli Aldunate, 3 F.3d 54 (2d Cir.) (refusing to require that litigant’s request be examined under foreign tribunal's discovery rules), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 443 , 126 L.Ed.2d 376 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Berge v. Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama
(2×)
See Trandes Corp. v. Guy F. Atkinson Co., 996 F.2d 655, 660 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 965 , 114 S.Ct. 443 , 126 L.Ed.2d 377 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
U.S. ex rel. Berge v. Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama
(2×)
See Trandes Corp. v. Guy F. Atkinson Co., 996 F.2d 655, 660 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 965 , 114 S.Ct. 443 , 126 L.Ed.2d 377 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re: Tidewater Sand Company, Incorporated, Debtor. Edward G. Grant, Trustee v. Richard H. Rose, Jr. Material Delivery, Incorporated Mechanicsville Concrete, Incorporated, and United States Trustee, Party in Interest. In Re: Tidewater Sand Company, Incorporated, Debtor. Edward G. Grant, Trustee v. Richard H. Rose, Jr. Material Delivery, Incorporated Mechanicsville Concrete, Incorporated, and United States Trustee, Party in Interest
"As this court has repeatedly held, issues raised for the first time on appeal generally will not be considered," unless it appears that "refusal to consider the newly raised issue would be plain error or would result in a fundamental miscarriage of justice." Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir.1993); accord Trandes Corp. v. Guy F. Atkinson Co., 996 F.2d 655, 665 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 443 (1993); National Wildlife Fed'n v. Hanson, 859 F.2d 313 , 318 (4th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Grant v. Rose
"As this court has repeatedly held, issues raised for the first time on appeal generally will not be considered," unless it appears that "refusal to consider the newly raised issue would be plain error or would result in a fundamental miscarriage of justice." Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993); accord Trandes Corp. v. Guy F. Atkinson Co., 996 F.2d 655, 665 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 114 S. Ct. 443 (1993); National Wildlife Fed'n v. Hanson, 859 F.2d 313, 318 (4th Cir. 1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smithfield Ham & Products Co. v. Portion Pac, Inc.
(2×)
Va.Code Ann. § 59.1-336; see Trandes Corp. v. Guy F. Atkinson Co., 996 F.2d 655, 665 (4th Cir.) (interpreting Maryland UTSA, and citing cases), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 443 , 126 L.Ed.2d 377 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Theophilis Bell
(2×)
Id. at 1437; see United States v. Eastland, 989 F.2d 760, 767 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 246 , 126 L.Ed.2d 200 and cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 443 , 126 L.Ed.2d 377 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Euromepa S.A. v. R. Esmerian, Inc.
See In re Application of Aldunate, 3 F.3d 54, 60, 62 (2d Cir.), cert. denied — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 443 , 126 L.Ed.2d 376 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Euromepa v. Esmerian, Inc.
See In re Application of Aldunate, 3 F.3d 54, 60, 62 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 443 , 126 L.Ed.2d 376 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pioneer Hi-Bred International, an Iowa Corporation v. Holden Foundation Seeds, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, Hawaiian Research, Ltd., an Iowa Corporation Corn States Hybrid Service, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, Pioneer Hi-Bred International, an Iowa Corporation v. Holden Foundation Seeds, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, Hawaiian Research, Ltd., an Iowa Corporation Corn States Hybrid Service, Inc., an Iowa Corporation
(2×)
See Trandes Corp. v. Guy F. Atkinson Co., 996 F.2d 655, 664 (4th Cir.) ("secrecy is a question of fact"), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 443 , 126 L.Ed.2d 377 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pioneer Hi-Bred International v. Holden Foundation Seeds, Inc.
(2×)
See Trandes Corp. v. Guy F. Atkinson Co., 996 F.2d 655, 664 (4th Cir.) (“secrecy is a question of fact”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 443 , 126 L.Ed.2d 377 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas
See United States v. Windham, 991 F.2d 181, 183 (5th Cir.) (noting that a defendant is required under the pre-1992 guidelines to accept responsibility for all relevant criminal conduct to be eligible for a downward departure under Sec. 3E1.1), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 444 , 126 L.Ed.2d 377 (1993); United States v. Alfaro, 919 F.2d 962, 968 (5th Cir.1990) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bill Wilder
See United States v. Windham, 991 F.2d 181, 183 (5th Cir.) (noting that a defendant is required under the pre-1992 guidelines to accept responsibility for all relevant criminal conduct to be eligible for a downward departure under § 3E1.1), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 444 , 126 L.Ed.2d 377 (1993); United States v. Alfaro, 919 F.2d 962, 968 (5th Cir.1990) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wilder
See United States v. Windham, 991 F.2d 181, 183 (5th Cir.) (noting that a defendant is required under the pre-1992 guidelines to accept responsibility for all relevant criminal conduct to be eligible for a downward departure under § 3E1.1), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 114 S. Ct. 444 , 126 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas
See United States v. Windham, 991 F.2d 181, 183 (5th Cir.) (noting that a defendant is required-under the pre-1992 guidelines to accept responsibility for all relevant criminal. conduct to be eligible for a downward departure under § 3E1.1), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 444 , 126 L.Ed.2d 377 (1993); United States v. Alfaro, 919 F.2d 962, 968 (5th Cir.1990) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thomas v. Artino
(2×)
Regarding FCA preemption of conversion claims, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has stated: The second prong of the preemption test is satisfied unless there is an “extra element” that changes the nature of the state law action so that it is “qualitatively different from a copyright infringement claim.” Rosciszewski [v. Arete Associates, Inc.,] 1 F.3d [225,] 229-30 [ (4th Cir.1993) ] (emphasis in original) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see also Trandes Corp. v. Guy F. Atkinson Co., 996 F.2d 655, 659-60 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 965 ,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Avalon Software Inc.
(2×)
See also Trandes Corp. v. Guy F. Atkinson Co., 996 F.2d 655, 658-59 (4th Cir.1993), cert. den. 510 U.S. 965 , 114 S.Ct. 443 , 126 L.Ed.2d 377 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael A. Barlow v. New York Life Insurance Company, and Roy E. Brown
If there is "substantial evidence opposed to the motion, that is, evidence of such quality and weight that reasonable and fair-minded men in the exercise of impartial judgment could reasonably return a verdict for the nonmoving party, the motion should be denied." Wyatt v. Interstate & Ocean Transport Co., 623 F.2d 888, 891 (4th Cir.1980); see also Trandes Corp. v. Guy F. Atkinson Co., 996 F.2d 655, 660-61 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 443 (1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Trandes Corp.
v.
Guy F. Atkinson Co
v.
Guy F. Atkinson Co
93-553.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 8, 1993.
Cited by 33 opinions | Published
TRANDES CORP.
v.
GUY F. ATKINSON CO.
No. 93-553.
Supreme Court of United States.
November 8, 1993.
1
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 996 F.2d 655.