green
Positive treatment
7.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
State of Tennessee v. Martha Ann Freeman
See United States v. Locklear, 24 F.3d 641 , 646 n. 2 (4th Cir.) (noting that defendant waives right to limiting instruction if he fails to ask for one), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 909 , 115 S. Ct. 278 , 130 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Green v. State
See Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1993) (habitual felony offender statute), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 909 , 115 S.Ct. 278 , 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994); Daniels v. State, 595 So.2d 952 (Fla.1992)(habitual violent felony offender statute).
discussed
Cited "see"
Torbert v. State
See Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 909 , 115 S.Ct. 278 , 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994)(prohibiting imposition of consecutive enhancement sentences for offenses arising out of the same criminal episode); Philmore v. State, 760 So.2d 1063 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)(applying Hale to consecutive sentences imposed under the PRR Act).
cited
Cited "see"
Robinson v. State
See Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), cert. den., 513 U.S. 909 , 115 S.Ct. 278 , 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Whitfield v. State
See Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), cert.denied, 513 U.S. 909 , 115 S.Ct. 278 , 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Spires v. State
See generally Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1993), cert. denied, Hale v. Florida, 513 U.S. 909 , 115 S.Ct. 278 , 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Fernandez v. State
See Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 909 , 115 S.Ct. 278 , 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mustafa Abdullah v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Agofsky, 20 F.3d 866, 872 (8th Cir.) (holding that a court commits "no error" in refusing to rule on pro se motions raised by a represented party), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 909 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mustafa Abdullah v. United States
See United States v. Agofsky, 20 F.3d 866, 872 (8th Cir.) (holding that a court commits "no error" in refusing to rule on pro se motions raised by a represented party), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 909 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Juan Causor-Serrato
See United States v. Agofsky, 20 F.3d 866, 870 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 909 , 115 S.Ct. 280 , 130 L.Ed.2d 196 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Juan Causor-Serrato
See United States v. Agofsky, 20 F.3d 866, 870 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 909 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Sapp v. State
See Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 909 , 115 S.Ct. 278 , 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Elbert Myron Riebold, Also Known as Mike Riebold
See United States v. Agofsky, 20 F.3d 866, 870 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 909 , 115 S.Ct. 280 , 130 L.Ed.2d 196 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Elbert Myron Riebold
See United States v. Agofsky, 20 F.3d 866, 870 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 909 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mancino v. State
See Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1993) (prohibiting imposition of consecutive habitual felony offender sentences under section 775.084, Florida Statutes, for multiple offenses arising out of the same criminal episode), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 909 , 115 S.Ct. 278 , 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hill v. State
See Mejia v. State, 675 So.2d 996 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). *800 For purposes of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, this court has held that the rule in Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 909 , 115 S.Ct. 278 , 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994), was announced on October 14, 1993, when the opinion was issued, and not on February 9, 1994, when rehearing was denied.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Saavedra
United States v. Ellison, 113 F.3d 77, 80 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 118 S.Ct. 235 (1997); see also United States v. Locklear, 24 F.3d 641 (4th Cir.) (treating the statutory provisions portion of the commentary to § 2D1.2 as authoritative evidence that a conviction under 21 U.S.C. §§ 859 , 860, or 861 is required in order to apply § 2D1.2), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 909 , and cert. denied, 513 U.S. 978 (1994). 3.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Saavedra
United States v. Ellison, 113 F.3d 77, 80 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 118 S.Ct. 235 , 139 L.Ed.2d 166 (1997); see also United States v. Locklear, 24 F.3d 641 (4th Cir.) (treating the statutory provisions portion of the commentary to § 2D1.2 as authoritative evidence that a conviction under 21 U.S.C. §§ 859 , 860, or 861 is required in order to apply § 2D1.2), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 909 , 115 S.Ct. 278 , 130 L.Ed.2d 195 , and cert. denied, 513 U.S. 978 , 115 S.Ct. 457 , 130 L.Ed.2d 365 (1994). 3.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Saborit
Wells, 63 F.3d at 752; see also Ireland, 62 F.3d at 230 (it is the jury’s job to judge the credibility of witnesses and to resolve contradictions in the evidence) (citing United States v. Agofsky, 20 F.3d 866, 869 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 909 , 115 S.Ct. 280 , 130 L.Ed.2d 196 (1994)).
Grier
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 94-5621.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1994.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.