Donovan v. Shalala, 115 S. Ct. 74 (1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Donovan v. Shalala, 115 S. Ct. 74 (1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State of Tennessee v. Chrysta Gail Pike (tenn, 1998-10-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) State of Tennessee v. Chrysta Gail Pike
Tenn. · 1998 · confidence medium
See State v. Cazes, 875 S.W .2d 253 , 263 (T enn. 19 94); cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 74 3, 130 L .Ed2d 6 44 (199 5); State v. Morris, 641 S.W.2d 883, 888 (Tenn . 1982).
cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. Pike
Tenn. Crim. App. · 1997 · confidence medium
See State v. Cazes, 875 S.W.2d 253, 263 (T enn. 19 94); cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 74 3, 130 L .Ed2d 6 44 (199 5); State v. Morris , 641 S.W.2d 883, 888 (Tenn . 1982).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Davis
11th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Barnette, 10 F.3d 1553, 1556 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 816 , 115 S.Ct. 74 , 130 L.Ed.2d 28 (1994)(granting restitution to *463 the extent justice requires).
cited Cited "see" Medicare & Medicaid Guide P 45,500, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 124 United States of America v. Perla Martin Davis, Marta Morfa, Emilio Valdes, Elva R. Lamas
11th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Barnette, 10 F.3d 1553, 1556 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 816 , 115 S.Ct. 74 , 130 L.Ed.2d 28 (1994)(granting restitution to the extent justice requires).
discussed Cited "see" Margaret H. Wright v. Illinois Department of Children & Family Services
7th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cromley v. Bd. of Educ. of Lockport H.S.D. 205, 17 F.3d 1059, 1067-69 (7th Cir.1994) (relying on Mount Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977)), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 74 , 130 L.Ed.2d 28 (1994).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Twitty
11th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
The Restitution Issue The Victim and Witness Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3663-3664 authorizes restitution to victims of crimes and specifically directs a sentencing judge to consider not only the victim’s injury, but also “the financial resources of the defendant, the financial needs and earning ability of the defendant and the defendant’s dependents, and such other factors as the court deems appropriate.” § 3664(a); see also United States v. Barnette, 10 F.3d 1553, 1556 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 816 , 115 S.Ct. 74 , 130 L.Ed.2d 28 (1994).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Supermex, Inc. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
Moreover, the Court added that, if the sanction is not so severe as to constitute a punishment, then no double jeopardy exists “ ‘in the civil enforcement of a remedial sanction____’” Id. at 443 , 109 S.Ct. at 1899 (quoting Helvering v. Mitchell, 303 U.S. at 404 , 58 S.Ct. at 635-36 ; see also United States v. Barnette, 10 F.3d 1553, 1560 (11th Cir., 1994), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 74 , 130 L.Ed.2d 28 (1994) (finding that the Double Jeopardy Clause would not bar recovery by the government of $50 million where the government’s total loss was only $15 million)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Dworkin v. General Motors Corp.
E.D. Pa. · 1995 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Cromley v. Board of Educ., 17 F.3d 1059, 1064-66 (7th Cir.) (affirming decision that law firm may continue to represent defendants in case in which attorney who formerly represented plaintiff in same case withdrew from representation of plaintiff and joined firm representing defendants because law firm's screening mechanism was effective and timely), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 74 , 130 L.Ed.2d 28 (1994).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." T-25A UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. THOMAS J. TWITTY; JOHN E. WATSON, a.k.a. Jack Watson; JOHN P. LARRISON, a.k.a. Jack Larrison; G. RICHARD LEVERITT
unknown court · signal: see also · confidence low
The Restitution Issue The Victim and Witness Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3663-3664 authorizes restitution to victims of crimes and specifically directs a sentencing judge to consider not only the victim's injury, but also "the financial resources of the defendant, the financial needs and earning ability of the defendant and the defendant's dependents, and such other factors as the court deems appropriate." § 3664(a); see also United States v. Barnette, 10 F.3d 1553, 1556 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 74 (1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rose A. DONOVAN, et vir, Parents of Tralane Donovan
v.
Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services
No. 93-1950.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1994.
115 S. Ct. 74
Published

Case below, 28 Fed.Cl. 459; 17 F.3d 1442.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.