green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Lugo v. Kuhlmann
Prosecutorial misconduct violates a defendant’s due process rights only when it is of “ ‘ “sufficient significance to result in the denial of the defendant’s right to a fair trial.” ’ ” Greer v. Miller, 483 U.S. 756, 765 , 107 S.Ct. 3102, 3109 , 97 L.Ed.2d 618 (1987); accord, e.g., United States v. McCarthy, 54 F.3d 51, 55 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 880 , 116 S.Ct. 214 , 133 L.Ed.2d 145 (1995); Blissett v. Lefevre, 924 F.2d 434, 440 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 852 , 112 S.Ct. 158 , 116 L.Ed.2d 123 (1991); Readdon v. Senkowski, 96 Civ. 4722, 1998 WL 720682 at *4 (S.…
discussed
Cited "see"
Avincola v. Stinson
Prosecutorial misconduct violates a defendant’s due process rights only when it is of “ ‘ “sufficient significance to result in the denial of the defendant’s right to a fair trial.” ’ ” Greer v. Miller, 483 U.S. 756, 765 , 107 S.Ct. 3102, 3109 , 97 L.Ed.2d 618 (1987); accord, e.g., United States v. McCarthy, 54 F.3d 51, 55 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 880 , 116 S.Ct. 214 , 133 L.Ed.2d 145 (1995); Blissett v. Lefevre, 924 F.2d 434, 440 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 852 , 112 S.Ct. 158 , 116 L.Ed.2d 123 (1991); Readdon v. Senkowski, 96 Civ. 4722, 1998 WL 720682 at *4 (S.…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gray
See generally United States v. McCarthy, 54 F.3d 51, 55 (2d Cir.) (no abuse of discretion to deny new trial based on newly discovered interim psychiatric report), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 880 , 116 S.Ct. 214 , 133 L.Ed.2d 145 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Berget v. State
See Sellers v. State, 889 P.2d 895, 897 (Okl.Cr.1995), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 214 , 133 L.Ed.2d 146 (1995); Coleman v. State, 693 P.2d 4, 5 (Okl.Cr.1984); Grimes v. State, 512 P.2d 231, 233 (Okl.Cr.1973); Harrell v. State, 493 P.2d 461, 462 (Okl.Cr.1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jabril Shareef
In assessing whether the comments complained of meet this test, we consider "the severity of the misconduct, the measures adopted to cure it, and the certainty of conviction in the absence of the misconduct." United States v. Melendez, 57 F.3d 238, 241 (2d Cir.1995) (summation); see also United States v. McCarthy, 54 F.3d 51, 55 (2d Cir.) (same standard for improper questions in cross-examination), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 880 , 116 S.Ct. 214 , 133 L.Ed.2d 145 (1995).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Metts v. Miller
See also United States v. McCarthy, 54 F.3d 51, 55 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 880 , 116 S.Ct. 214 , 133 L.Ed.2d 145 (1995); McEachin v. Ross, 951 F.Supp. 478, 481 (S.D.N.Y.1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Berry v. State
See also Mack v. State, 650 So.2d 1289, 1324-25 (Miss. 1994), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 116 S.Ct. 214 , 133 L.Ed.2d 146 (1995); Evans v. State, 422 So.2d 737, 742 (Miss. 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 939 , 103 S.Ct. 2111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983) (noting that an orderly and coherent sentencing hearing requires proof of the manner in which the homicide was committed, as well as, facts relevant to aggravating circumstances).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Earl Wesley Berry v. State of Mississippi
See also Mack v. State, 650 So. 2d 1289, 1324-25 (Miss. 1994), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 214 (1995); Evans v. State, 422 So. 2d 737, 742 (Miss. 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 939 (1983) (noting that an orderly and coherent sentencing hearing requires proof of the manner in which the homicide was committed, as well as, facts relevant to aggravating circumstances).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lisa A.
v.
Los Angeles County Department of Children's Services
v.
Los Angeles County Department of Children's Services
No. 95-5155.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1995.
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.