green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.5 score
“resale by the first purchaser of the original article under the producer's trademark is neither trademark infringement nor unfair competition.”
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Twin County Grocers, Inc. v. Mendez and Co., Inc.
the right of a producer to control distribution of its trademarked product does not extend beyond the first sale of the product.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Summit Technology, Inc. v. High-Line Medical Instruments Co.
resale by the first purchaser of the original article under the producer's trademark is neither trademark infringement nor unfair competition.
discussed
Cited "see"
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Motors Liquidation Co. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (In re Motors Liquidation Co.)
See Merex A.G. v. Fairchild Weston Systems, Inc., 810 F.Supp. 1356, 1369 (S.D.N.Y.1993), aff 'd by summary order, 54 F.3d 765 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 915 , 116 S.Ct. 302 , 133 L.Ed.2d 208 (1995) (court relied on testimony of alleged agent, a market manager, when he stated that he informed the plaintiff Merex that he had no authority to bind the defendant Fairchild); Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Dumas, 960 F.Supp. 710, 721 (S.D.N.Y.1997) ("There is no evidence suggesting that any of the [accountant agents alleged to have been authorized in the transaction in question] believed that it…
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Raytech Corp.
See Raytech Corp. v. White, supra, 516 U.S. 914 , 116 S.Ct. 302 , 133 L.Ed.2d 207 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Trans Union LLC v. Credit Research, Inc.
See generally Sebastian International, Inc. v. Longs Drug Stores Corp., 53 F.3d 1073, 1074-76 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 914 , 116 S.Ct. 302 , 133 L.Ed.2d 207 (1995). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see"
John Paul Mitchell Systems v. Randalls Food Markets, Inc.
See Sebastian Int’l, Inc. v. Longs Drug Stores Corp., 53 F.3d 1073, 1074 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 914 , 116 S.Ct. 302 , 133 L.Ed.2d 207 (1995) (applying first sale doctrine to diverted salon products being sold by retail chain); Matrix, 988 F.2d at 593 (citing NEC Elees, v. CAL Circuit Abco, 810 F.2d 1506 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 851 , 108 S.Ct. 152 , 98 L.Ed.2d 108 (1987)).
cited
Cited "see"
Cities Service Co. v. Gulf Oil Corp.
See Raytech Corporation v. White, 54 F.3d 187, 190 (3d Cir. 1995), cert. denied 516 U.S. 914 , 116 S.Ct. 302 , 133 L.Ed.2d 207 (1995). 22 .
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Raytech Corp.
See Raytech Corp. v. White, supra, 516 U.S. 914, 116 S.Ct. 302 , 133 L.Ed.2d 207 . *23 In November 1996, Raytech commenced Raytech Corp. v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Raytech Corp., supra, 217 B.R. 679 , seeking a declaration that its successor liability was limited.
cited
Cited "see"
Raytech Corp. v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Raytech Corp. (In Re Raytech Corp.)
See Raytech Corp. v. White, supra, 516 U.S. 914 , 116 S.Ct. 302 , 133 L.Ed.2d 207 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Capital District Physician's Health Plan v. O'Higgins
See Merex A.G. v. Fairchild Weston Systems, 810 F.Supp. 1356 (S.D.N.Y.1993) (citing 2 N.Y.Jur.2d Agency §§ 174, 247 for the proposition that the principal must have full knowledge of the agent’s act in order to have the ability or duty to ratify or renounce the action), affd, 54 F.3d 765 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 302 , 133 L.Ed.2d 208 (1995).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Pelletier v. Sordoni
See, e.g., Monk v. Virgin Islands Water & Power Authority, 53 F.3d 1381 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 914 , 116 S. Ct. 302 , 133 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thompson v. Jess
Proc. 244, 247 (1962); see also Monk v. Virgin Islands Water & Power Auth., 53 F.3d 1381 ,1390-91 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 914 , 116 S.Ct. 302 , 133 L.Ed.2d 207 (1995) (referring to same language of tentative draft of Restatement). ¶ 33 The rationale set forth in the special note quoted above is persuasive and provides *331 additional support for our holding that sections 413, 416, and 427 of the Restatement have no application to employees of independent contractors performing the work at issue.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Graham Webb International Ltd. Partnership v. Emporium Drug Mart, Inc.
See, e.g., Sebastian International, Inc. v. Longs Drug Stores Corporation, 53 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 302 , 133 L.Ed.2d 207 (1995); Matrix Essentials, 988 F.2d at 593; Polymer Technology Corp. v. Mimran, 975 F.2d 58, 61 (2nd Cir.1992); NEC Electronics v. CAL Circuit Abco, 810 F.2d 1506, 1509 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 851 , 108 S.Ct. 152 , 98 L.Ed.2d 108 (1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hill
v.
City of Chester
v.
City of Chester
No. 95-236.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1995.
Published
Citer courts: C.D. California (1) · D. Puerto Rico (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.