Burton v. Prunty, 516 U.S. 995 (1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Burton v. Prunty, 516 U.S. 995 (1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Com. v. Vasquez, J. (pasuperct, 2020-05-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Com. v. Vasquez, J.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2020 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Commonwealth v. Santiago, 654 A.2d 1062, 1082 (Pa.Super. 1994) (“Santiago II”), appeal denied, 541 Pa. 651 , 664 A.2d 540 (1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 995 , 116 S.Ct. 532 , 133 L.Ed.2d 437 (1995) (explaining statement of Commonwealth witness in pre-polygraph interview, that witness had not seen defendant with gun prior to victim’s murder, was contrary to witness’ testimony at appellant’s trial; statement, therefore, was relevant to enable defense to impeach testimony of key Commonwealth witness; nevertheless, witness’ pre-polygraph interview statement was ________________…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Burton
v.
Prunty, Warden
No. 95-6180.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 27, 1995.
516 U.S. 995
Published

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.