green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.1 score
“even where error is committed, reversal is not required unless such error results in a miscarriage of justice or constitutes a substantial violation of a constitutional or statutory right.”
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ellis v. Ward
even where error is committed, reversal is not required unless such error results in a miscarriage of justice or constitutes a substantial violation of a constitutional or statutory right.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Prince Brown
See United States v. Allison, 59 F.3d 43, 46 (6th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1002 (1995); see also Toth, 668 F.3d at 378–79 (“[A]n appeal of the denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea is an attack on the conviction subject to an appeal waiver provision.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Patino
See United States v. Allison, 59 F.3d 43, 46 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1002 , 116 S.Ct. 548 , 133 L.Ed.2d 450 *457 (1995) (holding that a defendant is not permitted to raise on appeal claims waived in a plea agreement); United States v. Calderon, 388 F.3d 197, 199 (6th Cir.2004) (noting that “a defendant in a criminal case may waive any right, even a constitutional right, by means of a plea agreement.”) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Stovall
See United States v. “effectuate[s] the mandate” of § 3147 by prescribing a three- Allison, 59 F.3d 43, 46 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1002 level enhancement.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lela Stovall
See United States v. Allison, 59 F.3d 43, 46 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1002 , 116 S.Ct. 548 , 133 L.Ed.2d 450 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
George C. Watson v. United States
See, United States v. Allison, 59 F.3d 43, 46 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1002 , 116 S.Ct. 548 , 133 L.Ed.2d 450 (1995); United States v. Ashe, 47 F.3d 770, 775-776 (6th Cir.1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Johnson
See, e.g., United States v. Allison, 59 F.3d 43, 46 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1002 , 116 S.Ct. 548 , 133 L.Ed.2d 450 (1995); United States v. Schmidt, 47 F.3d 188, 190 (7th Cir.1995). 2 However, and most respectfully, it is the view of this Court that it would be inappropriate for it to accept a plea agreement that waives the defendant’s right to *439 appeal an unconstitutional or otherwise illegal or erroneous sentence.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dykema
v.
Volkswagenwerk AG Harrel v. University of Houston Freeman et vir v. Simon Bardney v. United States Viswanathan v. Mississippi County Community College Board of Trustees Dalberto v. Pennsylvania Barton v. American Red Cross Leedy v. Agribank, FCB, Ratnaweera et ux. v. Resolution Trust Corporation Maloney v. Gladstone Morris, aka Pruitt v. Rivers, Warden Givens v. Louisiana Spinner et ux. v. County of Los Angeles, Department of Public Works Gaskins v. Runyon, Postmaster General Battle v. Moore, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections In re Echols, Foti v. Cameron Rivera v. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services Trice v. Williams Martel v. New Hampshire and Martel v. City of Concord Ishmael v. United States Testa v. Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees International Union, AFL-CIO Jenkins v. Kansas O'Neal v. Judicial Qualification Commission of Georgia Salazar v. Price Co. Triem v. Tamico, Inc. Brazil-Breashears v. Bilandic Shea v. Shea Jenkins v. Stuart Beals v. Del Papa, Attorney General of Nevada Wishon v. City of Jacksonville, Florida Johnson v. United States Bishop v. State Bar of Georgia Collier v. California Barrett v. Fieldhouse Middleton v. Kentucky Reeves v. Vance Turner v. Merit Systems Protection Board Winters v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. Jenkins v. McBride, Warden Paquette v. Angelone, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections Rutherford v. Hailey Pankey v. Carnahan, Governor of Missouri and Pankey v. Cook Johnson v. Evatt, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections Curiale v. Alaska Lindow v. United States Ketchum v. Department of Housing and Urban Development Rivera v. Long Island Railroad Grossi v. United States
v.
Volkswagenwerk AG Harrel v. University of Houston Freeman et vir v. Simon Bardney v. United States Viswanathan v. Mississippi County Community College Board of Trustees Dalberto v. Pennsylvania Barton v. American Red Cross Leedy v. Agribank, FCB, Ratnaweera et ux. v. Resolution Trust Corporation Maloney v. Gladstone Morris, aka Pruitt v. Rivers, Warden Givens v. Louisiana Spinner et ux. v. County of Los Angeles, Department of Public Works Gaskins v. Runyon, Postmaster General Battle v. Moore, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections In re Echols, Foti v. Cameron Rivera v. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services Trice v. Williams Martel v. New Hampshire and Martel v. City of Concord Ishmael v. United States Testa v. Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees International Union, AFL-CIO Jenkins v. Kansas O'Neal v. Judicial Qualification Commission of Georgia Salazar v. Price Co. Triem v. Tamico, Inc. Brazil-Breashears v. Bilandic Shea v. Shea Jenkins v. Stuart Beals v. Del Papa, Attorney General of Nevada Wishon v. City of Jacksonville, Florida Johnson v. United States Bishop v. State Bar of Georgia Collier v. California Barrett v. Fieldhouse Middleton v. Kentucky Reeves v. Vance Turner v. Merit Systems Protection Board Winters v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. Jenkins v. McBride, Warden Paquette v. Angelone, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections Rutherford v. Hailey Pankey v. Carnahan, Governor of Missouri and Pankey v. Cook Johnson v. Evatt, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections Curiale v. Alaska Lindow v. United States Ketchum v. Department of Housing and Urban Development Rivera v. Long Island Railroad Grossi v. United States
No. 94-1910; No. 94-1948; No. 94-1960; No. 94-1975; No. 94-1986; No. 94-2023; No. 94-2091; No. 94-9215; No. 94-9220; No. 94-9306; No. 94-9313; No. 94-9335; No. 94-9353; No. 94-9359; No. 94-9373; No. 94-9405; No. 94-9423; No. 94-9456; No. 94-9587; No. 94-9599; No. 94-9641; No. 94-9660; No. 94-9725; No. 95-18; No. 95-94; No. 95-161; No. 95-183; No. 95-5037; No. 95-5070; No. 95-5091; No. 95-5132; No. 95-5148; No. 95-5163; No. 95-5178; No. 95-5185; No. 95-5206; No. 95-5254; No. 95-5267; No. 95-5268; No. 95-5274; No. 95-5275; No. 95-5278; No. 95-5308; No. 95-5389; No. 95-5408; No. 95-5468; No. 95-5490; No. 95-5577; No. 95-5925.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 27, 1995.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Court of Criminal Appeals of O… (1)
[*1002] ante, p. 811;
ante, p. 813;
ante, p. 814;
ante, p. 815;
ante, p. 815;
ante, p. 818;
ante, p. 822;
[*1003] No. 94-9215. No. 94-9220. No. 94-9306. No. 94-9313. No. 94-9335. No. 94-9353. No. 94-9359. No. 94-9373. No. 94-9405. No. 94-9423. No. 94-9456. No. 94-9587. No. 94-9599. No. 94-9641. No. 94-9660. No. 94-9725. No. 95-18. No. 95-94. No. 95-161. No. 95-183. No. 95-5037. No. 95-5070. No. 95-5091. No. 95-5132. No. 95-5148. No. 95-5163. No. 95-5178. No. 95-5185.ante, p. 827;
ante, p. 828;
ante, p. 830;
ante, p. 830;
ante, p. 831;
ante, p. 832;
ante, p. 832;
ante, p. 833;
ante, p. 805;
ante, p. 835;
ante, p. 836;
ante, p. 844;
ante, p. 844;
ante, p. 818;
ante, p. 848;
ante, p. 852;
ante, p. 862;
ante, p. 865;
ante, p. 868;
ante, p. 869;
ante, p. 873;
ante, p. 875;
ante, p. 876;
ante, p. 879;
ante, p. 880;
ante, p. 880;
ante, p. 881;
ante, p. 881;
[*1004] No. 95-5206. No. 95-5254. No. 95-5267. No. 95-5268. No. 95-5274. No. 95-5275. No. 95-5278. No. 95-5308. No. 95-5389. No. 95-5408. No. 95-5468. No. 95-5490. No. 95-5577. No. 95-5925.ante, p. 882;
ante, p. 885;
ante, p. 886;
ante, p. 886;
ante, p. 875;
ante, p. 886;
ante, p. 887;
ante, p. 888;
ante, p. 893;
ante, p. 894;
ante, p. 897;
ante, p. 898;
ante, p. 921; and
ante, p. 927. Petitions for rehearing denied.