green
Positive treatment
6.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Tamoxifen Citrate Antitrust Litigation
See U.S. Philips Corp. v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 55 F.3d 592, 598 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1010 , 116 S.Ct. 567 , 133 L.Ed.2d 492 (1995). 9 After the Settlement Agreement was entered into and the vacatur ordered, Barr began to market its licensed version of Zeneca's tamoxifen, selling its product to distributors and wholesalers at a 15 percent discount to the brand-name price, which translated into a price to consumers about five percent below Zeneca's otherwise identical Nolvadex® brand-name version.
cited
Cited "see"
Joblove, Allied Servs. v. Barr Labs. Inc.
See U.S. Philips Corp. v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 55 F.3d 592, 598 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1010 , 116 S.Ct. 567 , 133 L.Ed.2d 492 (1995). .
cited
Cited "see"
Joblove v. Barr Labs. Inc.
See U.S. Philips Corp. v. Seals Roebuck & Co., 55 F.3d 592, 598 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1010 , 116 S.Ct. 567 , 133 L.Ed.2d 492 (1995). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Bigg Wolf Discount Video Movie Sales, Inc. v. Montgomery County
See 11126 Baltimore Boulevard v. Prince George’s County, 58 F.3d 988, 995 (4th Cir.1995), cert denied, 516 U.S. 1010 , 116 S.Ct. 567 , 133 L.Ed.2d 492 *400 (1995) (holding that an ordinance that prohibited adult bookstores from operating anywhere within the county until the county granted it a special exception constituted a prior restraint, as opposed to a Renton-type time, place and manner restriction).
discussed
Cited "see"
Planned Parenthood of South Carolina, Inc. v. Rose
See Chesapeake B & M, Inc. v. Hartford County, MD, 58 F.3d 1005, 1009-10 (4th Cir.) (applying Lakewood to find that plaintiffs had standing to make facial First Amendment challenge to licensing law), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1010 , 116 S.Ct. 567 , 133 L.Ed.2d 492 (1995); Finlator v. Powers, 902 F.2d 1158, 1161-62 (4th Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Howard v. City of Jacksonville
See 11126 Baltimore Boulevard, Inc. v. Prince George’s County, Md., 58 F.3d 988 (4th Cir.1995), cert. den. 516 U.S. 1010 , 116 S.Ct. 567 , 133 L.Ed.2d 492 (1995)(150 day review period unreasonably long).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kentucky Bridge & Dam, Inc. v. United States
See, e.g., Wang Labs., Inc., 958 F.2d at 359 ; In re Cassidy, 892 F.2d 637, 641 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 812 , 111 S.Ct. 48 , 112 L.Ed.2d 24 (1990); see generally U.S. Philips Corp. v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 55 F.3d 592, 596-97 (Fed.Cir.) cert. denied, [516] U.S. [1010], 116 S.Ct. 567 , 133 L.Ed.2d 492 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tasini v. New York Times Co.
See Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Dumas, 53 F.3d 549, 564 (2d Cir.) (finding that cheek legend providing for the “assignment ... of all right, title, and interest” was ambiguous, and did not effectively transfer copyright in certain paintings), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 567 , 133 L.Ed.2d 491 (1995); see also Papa’s-June, 921 F.Supp. at 1159 (“neither the royalty checks nor the attached royalty statements mention a transfer of copyright ownership.”); Museum Boutique Intercontinental, Ltd. v. Picasso, 880 F.Supp. 153 , 162 n. 11 (S.D.N.Y.1995) (“the checks submitted by MBI, …
discussed
Cited "see"
Armento v. Laser Image, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Dumas, 53 F.3d 549, 560 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 567 , 133 L.Ed.2d 491 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Larry Jerome Brooks v. City of Winston-Salem, North Carolina M.N. Barker, Individually and as a City Police Officer
See 11126 Baltimore Blvd., Inc. v. Prince George's County, Md., 58 F.3d 988 , 993 n. 7 (4th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 567 , 133 L.Ed.2d 492 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Brooks v. Winston-Salem
See 11126 Baltimore Blvd., Inc. v. Prince George's County, Md., 58 F.3d 988 , 993 n.7 (4th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 567 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tucker v. Waddell
See 11126 Baltimore Blvd., Inc. v. Prince George's County, 58 F.3d 988 , 993 n. 7 (4th Cir.) (issues not briefed or argued are deemed abandoned), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 567 , 133 L.Ed.2d 492 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tucker v. Waddell
See 11126 Baltimore Blvd., Inc. v. Prince George’s County, 58 F.3d 988 , 993 n. 7 (4th Cir.) (issues not briefed or argued are deemed abandoned), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 567 , 133 L.Ed.2d 492 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Data General Corporation v. Johnson
See e.g., Wang Lab., Inc., 958 F.2d at 359 ; In re Cassidy, 892 F.2d 637, 641 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 812 , 111 S.Ct. 48 , 112 L.Ed.2d 24 (1990); see generally U.S. Philips Corp. v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 55 F.3d 592, 596-97 (Fed.Cir.) cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 567 , 133 L.Ed.2d 492 (1995). 66 The decision whether to invoke judicial estoppel lies within the court's discretion, and a refusal to apply the doctrine is reviewed under the "abuse of discretion" standard.
discussed
Cited "see"
Zeneca Ltd. v. Novopharm Ltd.
See U.S. Philips Corp. v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 55 F.3d 592, 598 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 567 , 133 L.Ed.2d 492 (1995) (refusing to reconsider the propriety of a vacatur that was final when the decision in U.S. Bancorp was issued).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
TMTV, CORP. v. Mass Productions, Inc.
Compare Schiller & Schmidt, Inc. v. Nordisco co Corp., 969 F.2d 410, 413 (7th Cir.1992) (written work-for-hire agreement must precede creation of work), and Gladwell Gov't Servs., Inc. v. Cnty. of Marin, 265 Fed.Appx. 624, 626 (9th Cir.2008) (same), with Playboy Enters., Inc. v. Dumas, 53 F.3d 549 , 559 (2d Cir.) (written agreement might postdate creation if "memorializing” earlier oral agreement), ce rt. denied, 516 U.S. 1010 , 116 S.Ct. 567 , 133 L.Ed.2d 491 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pack Shack, Inc. v. Howard County
(2×)
See, e.g., 11126 Baltimore Boulevard, Inc., v. Prince George’s County, 58 F.3d 988 , 996 n. 12 (4th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1010 , 116 S.Ct. 567 , 133 L.Ed.2d 492 (1995). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dumas
v.
Playboy Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Playboy Enterprises, Inc.
No. 95-549.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 4, 1995.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.