green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.1 score
“the fact that the payer of damages and the dispenser of a collateral benefit are one and the same, or that they are linked in some economically meaningful sense, tends to make the deployment of the collateral source rule less attractive.”
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Falconer v. Penn Maritime, Inc.
the fact that the payer of damages and the dispenser of a collateral benefit are one and the same, or that they are linked in some economically meaningful sense, tends to make the deployment of the collateral source rule less attractive.
cited
Cited "see"
Toro v. Sanchez
See, Lussier v. Runyon, 50 F.3d 1103, 1108-09 (1st Cir.1995) cert. denied 516 U.S. 815 , 116 S.Ct. 69 , 133 L.Ed.2d 30 (1995); Quint v. A.E.
cited
Cited "see"
Asiana Airlines v. Federal Aviation Administration
See Radio Ass’n on Defending Airwave Rights, Inc. v. Department of Transportation, 47 F.3d 794, 806 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 616 U.S. 811 , 116 S.Ct. 69 , 133 L.Ed.2d 22 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Moran v. GTech Corp.
See Lussier v. Runyon, 50 F.3d 1103, 1107-08 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 815 , 116 S.Ct. 69 , 133 L.Ed.2d 30 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Kentucky State Police Department
See Lussier v. Runyon, 50 F.3d 1103, 1108-09 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 69 , 133 L.Ed.2d 30 (1995) (describing four-to-three circuit split on whether collateral benefits should be deducted from back pay awards and siding with those appeals courts that have given trial courts discretion to deduct such benefits).
discussed
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Kentucky State Police Department
See Lussier v. Runyon, 50 F.3d 1103, 1108-09 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 69 , 133 L.Ed.2d 30 (1995) (describing four-to-three circuit split on whether collateral benefits should be deducted from back pay awards and siding with those appeals courts that have given trial courts discretion to deduct such benefits).
cited
Cited "see"
Vecinos De Barrio Uno v. City of Holyoke
See Lussier v. Runyon, 50 F.3d 1103, 1115 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 69 , 133 L.Ed.2d 30 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vecinos de Barrio v. City of Holyoke
See Lussier v. Runyon, 50 ___ _______ ______ F.3d 1103, 1115 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 69 (1995). _____ ______ At a minimum, the court must discuss the evidence we have identified as troubling (or as possibly overlooked) and explain the relationship of this evidence to the issue of vote dilution.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Allen W. Rose v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company
See, e.g., Lussier v. Runyon, 50 F.3d 1103, 1114 (1st Cir.) (holding that district court erred when it took judicial notice without giving parties an opportunity to be heard), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 815 , 116 S.Ct. 69 , 133 L.Ed.2d 30 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cazey
v.
Scott, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
v.
Scott, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
No. 94-1983.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1995.
Published
Citer courts: D. Maine (1) · Court of Criminal Appeals of T… (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.