green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.0 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Stanley v. Kuhlman
the credibility of witnesses is the province of the jury and we simply cannot replace the jury's credibility determinations with our own
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Williams v. McCoy
the credibility of witnesses is the province of the jury and we simply cannot replace the jury's credibility determination with our own.
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Eldred
See Commonwealth v. Power , 420 Mass. 410 , 416-417, 650 N.E.2d 87 (1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1042 , 116 S.Ct. 697 , 133 L.Ed.2d 655 (1996) ; Lapointe , supra .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Roderick T. Harvey
See Tyson v. Trigg, 50 F.3d 436, 444-45 (7th Cir.1995), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 697 , 133 L.Ed.2d 655 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gunby
See United States v. Khan, 53 F.3d 507, 518 (2nd Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 697 , 133 L.Ed.2d 655 (1996); United States v. Murillo, 902 F.2d 1169, 1174 (5th Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
John M. Holland v. Craig Hanks
See Tyson v. Trigg, 50 F.3d 436, 441 (7th Cir.1995) ("The right to a judge who is free from the mere appearance of partiality is not part of due process at all, let alone a fundamental part."), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 697 (1996) (citing Del Vecchio v. Illinois Dept. of Corrections, 31 F.3d 1363, 1380 (7th Cir.1994) (en banc)); Walberg, 766 F.2d at 1076-77 (noting that the statutes that require removal of judges for bias, prejudice, or conflict of interest, 28 U.S.C. §§ 144 , 455, require actual bias or prejudice as opposed to the mere appearance of bias or prejudice). 11 Finally, we reject H…
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1996
See, Tyson v. Trigg, 50 F.3d 436, 446-47 (7th Cir.1995) ("reasons the Court gave in Brecht for adopting a less stringent rule are independent of the rule applied in the state appellate process"), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 697 , 133 L.Ed.2d 655 (1996); Horsley v. Alabama, 45 F.3d 1486 , 1492 n. 11 (11th Cir.) ("We think the Supreme Court's rationale (advancing comity, federalism, finality, and the importance of the trial) for the Brecht rule reaches to almost all federal habeas cases, including this one."), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 410 , 133 L.Ed.2d 328 (1995); see al…
discussed
Cited "see"
William Bracy v. Richard B. Gramley, Roger Collins v. George C. Welborn
(2×)
See Tyson v. Trigg, 50 F.3d 436, 439 (7th Cir.1995), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 697 , 133 L.Ed.2d 655 (1996). 3 56 Our own ability to monitor the influence of the trial judge, and to discern the taint of partiality, is narrowly circumscribed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hanna v. Riveland
See, Tyson v. Trigg, 50 F.3d 436, 446-47 (7th Cir.1995) ("reasons the Court gave in Brecht for adopting a less stringent rule are independent of the rule applied in the state appellate process”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 697 , 133 L.Ed.2d 655 (1996); Horsley v. Alabama, 45 F.3d 1486 , 1492 n. 11 (11th Cir.) ("We think the Supreme Court's rationale (advancing comity, federalism, finality, and the importance of the trial) for the Brecht rule reaches to almost all federal habeas cases, including this one.”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 410 , 133 L.Ed.2d 328 (1995); see also S…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Pascarella, Mark D'andrea, John Breheney
See United States v. Khan, 53 F.3d 507, 516-17 (2d Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 697 , 133 L.Ed.2d 655 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Panaro v. Kelly
Maldonado, supra; see also United States v. Khan, 53 F.3d 507, 513 (2d Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1042 , 116 S.Ct. 697 , 133 L.Ed.2d 655 (1996); United States v. Sureff, 15 F.3d 225, 228 (2d Cir.1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. George Thompson
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Khan, 53 F.3d 507, 519 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 697 , 133 L.Ed.2d 655 (1995); United States v. Porter, 41 F.3d 68, 71 (2d Cir.1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dey v. Scully
Nor does § 2254(d) require deference to state court findings “on mixed issues of fact and law such as whether a plea agreement was entered into voluntarily ... or whether there has been ineffective assistance of counsel.” Ventura, 957 F.2d at 1055 ; see also Tyson v. Trigg, 883 F.Supp. 1213, 1218 (S.D.Ind.1994) (petitioner is correct in his contention that the “decision to exclude [the proffered] evidence raises a mixed question of law and fact and that no deference is due the state courts’ conclusions on this matter.”), aff'd, 50 F.3d 436 (7th Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. —,…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael S. Patasnik and James Cecere
See, e.g., United States v. Khan, 53 F.3d 507, 519 (2d Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 697 , 133 L.Ed.2d 655 (1996); United States v. Soto, 47 F.3d 546, 550-51 (2d Cir.1995).
American Legion
v.
Brown, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
v.
Brown, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
No. 95-254.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 8, 1996.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. New York (2)
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.