Ivory v. United States, 516 U.S. 1136 (1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Ivory v. United States, 516 U.S. 1136 (1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
37 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Adanandus v. Johnson (txwd, 1996-09-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Adanandus v. Johnson
W.D. Tex. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Krout, 66 F.3d 1420, 1428 (5th Cir.1995), cert, denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct, 963 , 133 L.Ed.2d 884 (1996) (holding Batson objections must be raised before venire dismissed); Thomas v. Moore, 866 F.2d 803, 805 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 493 U.S. 840 , 110 S.Ct. 124 , 107 L.Ed.2d 85 (1989) (“A timely objection and the corresponding opportunity to evaluate the circumstances of the jury selection process are essential to a trial court's reasoned application of the limitations placed on peremptory challenges by the Batson holding.”). 273 .See United States v. Fike, 82 F.3…
cited Cited "see" UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HUMBERTO DIAZ
unknown court · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Krout, 66 F.3d 1420, 1433-34 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 963 (1996).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Lane (2×)
Minn. · 1998 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare, e.g., United States v. Escotto, 121 F.3d 81, 84 (2d Cir.1997) ("We have * * * stated a clear preference for readbacks whenever they are requested by a deliberating jury."), ( cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 118 S.Ct. 720 , 139 L.Ed.2d 660 (1998)), with, e.g., United States v. Krout, 66 F.3d 1420, 1433 (5th Cir.1995) ("Generally, rereading or replaying testimony is disfavored."), ( cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1136 , 116 S.Ct. 963 , 133 L.Ed.2d 884 (1996).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Medina
5th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Krout, 66 F.3d 1420, 1435 ("Only in that rare instance where the details of the attorney’s conduct are 'well developed' in the record is such a claim properly considered on direct appeal.” (citation omitted), cert. denied,-U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 963 , 133 L.Ed.2d 884 (1996)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ivory
v.
United States
No. 95-7401.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 20, 1996.
516 U.S. 1136
Published

C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.