green
Positive treatment
6.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. EFF
See United States v. Broussard, 80 F.3d 1025, 1034 (5th Cir.1996), ce rt. denied 519 U.S. 906 , 117 S.Ct. 264 , 136 L.Ed.2d 189 (1996); see also United States v. Ballard, 586 F.2d 1060, 1063 (5th Cir.1978) (concluding that a statement that the accused’s cooperation will be made known to the court is an insufficient inducement to render subsequent confession involuntary); United States v. Ornelas-Rodriguez, 12 F.3d 1339, 1348 (5th Cir.1994), cert. denied 512 U.S. 1222 , 114 S.Ct. 2713 , 129 L.Ed.2d 839 (advising accused that there are advantages to cooperating does not render confession invol…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Pollani
See United States v. Broussard, 80 F.3d 1025, 1040 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 906 , 117 S.Ct. 264 (1996)(a prior conviction more than ten years old was admissible).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hernandez-Guevara
See United States v. Broussard, 80 F.3d 1025, 1040 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 264 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jesus Hernandez-Guevara
See United States v. Broussard, 80 F.3d 1025, 1040 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 264 , 136 L.Ed.2d 189 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Chavez
See United States v. Broussard, 80 F.3d 1025, 1040 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 264 , 136 L.Ed.2d 189 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wright
(2×)
Accord United States v. Broussard, 80 F.3d 1025, 1041 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 264 , 136 L.Ed.2d 189 (1996); Quilici v. Village of Morton Grove, 695 F.2d 261, 271 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 863 , 104 S.Ct. 194 , 78 L.Ed.2d 170 (1983); Warin, 530 F.2d at 108 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Clinton Manges David Wayne Myers and Carl Hubert Shanklin
See United States v. Broussard, 80 F.3d 1025, 1037 (5th Cir.) (to establish prejudice from joint trial, *1176 defendant must show that co-defendant would in fact testify if severance were granted), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 264 , 136 L.Ed.2d 189 (1996). 11 Second, Manges complains that the denial of his severance motion exposed the jury to prejudicial testimony that McLester had pleaded guilty in the alleged conspiracy.
discussed
Cited "see"
San Diego County Gun Rights Committee v. Reno
See United States v. Broussard, 80 F.3d 1025, 1041 (5th Cir.) (‘We are not persuaded to discover or declare a new constitutional right to possess weapons under the Ninth Amendment on the basis of Merritt’s proffered ‘authority 1 [a law review article].”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 117 S.Ct. 264 , — L.Ed.2d — (1996); Quilici v. Village of Morton Grove, 695 F.2d 261, 271 (7th Cir.1982) (“Appellants may believe the ninth amendment should be read to recognize an unwritten, fundamental, individual right to own or possess firearms; the fact remains that the Supreme Court has never em…
discussed
Cited "see"
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7760, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,811 San Diego County Gun Rights Committee Mark Bruce Skane Henri Jon Donald Buettner John Wallner and San Diego Militia v. Janet Reno, Attorney General of the United States of America Frank Newman, Acting Secretary of the Treasury Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms
See United States v. Broussard, 80 F.3d 1025, 1041 (5th Cir.) ("We are not persuaded to discover or declare a new constitutional right to possess weapons under the Ninth Amendment on the basis of Merritt's proffered 'authority' [a law review article]."), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 264 , 136 L.Ed.2d 189 (1996); Quilici v. Village of Morton Grove, 695 F.2d 261, 271 (7th Cir.1982) ("Appellants may believe the ninth amendment should be read to recognize an unwritten, fundamental, individual right to own or possess firearms; the fact remains that the Supreme Court has never embraced thi…
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JIMMY WATSON
See United States v. Broussard, 80 F.3d 1025, 1039 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 264 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CLINTON MANGES; DAVID WAYNE MYERS; and CARL HUBERT SHANKLIN
See United States v. Broussard, 80 F.3d 1025, 1037 (5th Cir.) (to establish prejudice from joint trial, defendant must show that co- defendant would in fact testify if severance were granted), cert. denied, ---U.S.---, 117 S.Ct. 264 , 136 L.Ed.2d 189 (1996).11 Second, Manges complains that the denial of his severance 10 Shanklin and Myers also claim that they suffered “prejudicial spillover” from the use of the Addington tapes as evidence against Manges on the dismissed bribery count.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Geter
v.
Franklin National Bank of Washington, D. C.
v.
Franklin National Bank of Washington, D. C.
No. 96-5650.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1996.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.